2013/2014 BA-HASOC_VEIG Entrepreneurship and Innovation in a Global Perspective. Concepts, Development, and Challenges
English Title | |
Entrepreneurship and Innovation in a Global Perspective. Concepts, Development, and Challenges |
Course information |
|
Language | English |
Exam ECTS | 7.5 ECTS |
Type | Elective |
Level | Bachelor |
Duration | One Semester |
Course period | Autumn
Changes in course schedule may occur Wednesday 12.35-14.25, week 36-49 Friday 12.35-14.15 week 36 |
Time Table | Please see course schedule at e-Campus |
Max. participants | 80 |
Study board |
Study Board for BSc in Business Administration and
Sociology
|
Course coordinator | |
|
|
Administrative contact: Karina Ravn Nielsen - electives.lpf@cbs.dk or tel.: 38153782 | |
Main academic disciplines | |
|
|
Last updated on 22-03-2013 |
Learning objectives | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discussing contemporary and
historical cases case in connection to different theoretical
approaches to entrepreneurship and innovation, the course provides
the skills to better understand the dynamic of business
development. The students acquire knowledge about entrepreneurship
in changing historical and institutional contexts and in different
types of business organizations. They develop an understanding of
how complex relations between individuals, organizations, and
institutions, and inner-organizational relations and technology,
influence entrepreneurial decision making and the process of
innovation. They learn how internationally different institutional
arrangements and cultures influence both entrepreneurship and
innovation. The course deepens the understanding why and how
entrepreneurial activity is important for economic development (and
that it can be disastrous, too), and it provides insights which
type of economic activity can be regarded entrepreneurial.
On the practical level the students studying recent and historical cases of entrepreneurship and innovation in a global economy learn how entrepreneurs identify opportunities, how they overcome traditional markets and national borders, and how they create markets and business organizations in different national contexts. The exam format of the course (the self-chosen case, the need for finding relevant literature, and the combination of empirical and theoretical knowledge) also prepares for the Bachelor project. This means, however, that the project development is also demanding. This course is not an instruction in setting up new business ventures. In order to achieve Grade 12 the student must
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Course prerequisites | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Individual preparation and group discussions before class (reading and preparation requires appr. 4h per class). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Examination | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Course content and structure | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Entrepreneurship and innovation changed the world and will
continue to change the world. But what do entrepreneurs do? What is
entrepreneurial behaviour? Can it be learned? What is innovation
and how is it made? Is it possible to institutionalize
entrepreneurship and innovation? How important is entrepreneurship
for economic development?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Teaching methods | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The course will be taught in 15 weeks (2h each). It is based on case discussions combined with group discussions and students’ presentations; only some aspects of the course will be lectured. This implies that, in order to reach the learning aims, students must be prepared before they come to classes, and that they actively participate and contribute to the discussion. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Student workload | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected literature | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tentative
Literature:
The literature and cases will be provided in a compendium. Some cases must be downloaded from the Harvard Business School homepage. Cases J.R. Bernstein(1997): ‘Toyota Automatic Looms and Toyota Automobiles‘, in: T. McCraw (ed.), Creating Modern Capitalism. How Entrepreneurs, Companies, and Countries Triumphed in Three Industrial Revolutions, (Cambridge: Harvard University Press), pp. 398-438 + notes. J. Bessant/J. Tidd (2011): Innovation and Entrepreneurship. 2nd ed. (Chichester: Wiley & Son), several short cases and extracts. R. A. Burgelman/P.E. Meza: Innovation at HP: The Role of the Innovation Program Office (IPO), Stanford Graduate School of Business case no. SM172 A. Farhoomand (2011): Microsoft. Is the Creative Spark Burning Out? (Asia Research Centre. University of Hongkong) HKU 914. P. Ghemawat, J.L. Nueno (2006): Zara: Fast Fashion, HBS case 703497. J.R. Immelt, V. Govindarajan, C. Timble (2009): ‘How GE is disrupting itself’, in: Harvard Business Review Okt. 2009. A.B. Hargadon/Y. Douglass (2001): ‘When Innovations meet Institutions: Edison and the Design of the Electric Light’, in: Administrative Science Quarterly 46, pp. 476-501. N. F. Koehn: Estee Lauder and the Market for Prestige Cosmetics, HBS case no. 801362 N. F. Koehn (1997): ‘Josiah Wedgwood and the First Industrial Revolution’, in: T. McCraw (ed.), Creating Modern Capitalism. How Entrepreneurs, Companies, and Countries Triumphed in Three Industrial Revolutions, (Cambridge: Harvard University Press), pp. 17-48 + notes. M. Lindh de Montoya (2000): ‘Entrepreneurship and Culture: The Case of Freddy, the Strawberry Man’, in: R. Swedberg (ed.), Entrepreneuership. The Social Science View, (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 332-355. T.K. McCraw/R.S. Tedlow: ‘Henry Ford, Alfred Sloan, and the Three Phases of Marketing‘, in: T. McCraw (ed.), Creating Modern Capitalism. How Entrepreneurs, Companies, and Countries Triumphed in Three Industrial Revolutions, (Cambridge: Harvard University Press), 266-300 + notes. E. Ofek, A. Berkley Wagonfeld (2012): Speeding ahead to a Better Place, HBS case 512056. Stefan Thomke (2002): ‘Innovation at 3M Corporation (A)’, HBS case 699012. Concepts of Entrepreneurship and Innovation M. Casson (2010): 'Entrepreneurship: theory, institutions, and history. Eli F. Heckscher Lecture, 2009', in: Scandinavian Economic History Review 58: no. 2, pp. 139-170. Peter F. Drucker (1993): Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Practice and Principles, New York: Harper; select chapters. G. Dosi (1982): 'Technological paradigms and technological trajectories', in: Research Policy 11, pp. 147-162. W. Lazonick (2005): 'The Innovative Firm', in: Fagerberg, D.C. Mowery, R.R. Nelson (ed.): The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 29-55. N. Rosenberg (2000): ‘Innovators and “mere imitators” ‘, in: N. Rosenberg: Schumpeter and the Endogeneity of Technology: Some American Perspectives (London: Routledge), pp. 58-78, footnotes, pp. 113-116. J.A. Schumpeter (1942): ‘The Process of Creative Destruction Capitalism’, in: J.A. Schumpeter: Socialism and Democracy (London: Harper & Brothers), pp. 81-86. J.A. Schumpeter (1947): 'The Creative Response in Economic History', in: Journal of Economic History VII: 2, pp. 149-159. A.J. Scott (2006): 'Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Industrial Development: Geography and the Creative Field Revisited', in: Small Business Economics 26: no. 1, pp. 1-24. S. Shane/S. Venkataraman (2000): 'The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research', in: Academy of Management Review 25: no. 1, pp. 217-226. R.W. Smilor (1997): 'Entrepreneurship. Reflections on a subversive activity, in: Journal of Business Venturing 12: 5, pp. 341-346. |