| Learning objectives |
To achieve the grade 12, students
should meet the following learning objectives with no or only minor
mistakes or errors: The students should be able to demonstrate:
- a clear understanding of the main issues covered during the
course,
- a good command of the key concepts and theories introduced by
the course, and
- an ability to apply key concepts and theories in an analysis of
sustainable business.
|
| Course prerequisites |
| Ingen |
| Examination |
|
24-hour
individual home assignment:
|
| Exam ECTS |
7,5 |
| Examination form |
Home assignment - written product |
| Individual or group exam |
Individual |
| Size of written product |
Max. 5 pages |
| Assignment type |
Case based assignment |
| Duration |
24 hours to prepare |
| Grading scale |
7-step scale |
| Examiner(s) |
One internal examiner |
| Exam period |
Spring |
| Make-up exam/re-exam |
Same examination form as the ordinary
exam
|
|
| Course content and
structure |
|
Course content and structure
|
|
The course is an introduction to sustainable business with a
focus on firms’ environmental and social impact on society. It
provides students with an understanding of Corporate Social
Responsibility (CSR) issues in relation to organization,
supply-change management, finance, non-financial accounting and
reporting. The course addresses stakeholder approaches to strategic
management, branding through CSR, CSR in supply chains, social and
environmental management systems, CSR reporting and socially
responsible investment. Students will obtain knowledge about how
corporations integrate CSR issues in order to identify new business
opportunities, communicate with their stakeholders, compete in
global markets, and address social and environmental sustainability
expectations and requirements of firms in the early 21st
century. Beside of introducing a number of CSR issues, the course
provides students with analytical skills and theories to critically
interrogate CSR ideals and practices.
Sustainable business and CSR concerns the governance of
environmental, social and economic aspects. In a world where
corporate reputation is essential to the success of business, CSR
and its focus on stakeholder dialogue and responsible business
development can enhance the market share of enterprises. CSR
strategies may include optimization of operational efficiency to
increase workplace productivity (human resource management) and to
reduce cost associated with environmental or social risks (risk
management). The course develops students’ competencies with regard
to govern such new business opportunities to the advantage of the
corporations.
The course rests upon a stakeholder view of the corporation. Its
central proposition is that organizational wealth is created (or
destroyed) through a corporation's interaction and
communication with its stakeholders. Emphasis will be given to
characterizing and discussing what constitutes as effective
stakeholder engagement. To this end, the course will, in
particular, look into how corporate social responsibility issues
can be integrated in business through stakeholder engagement
processes.
|
|
| Teaching methods |
| The course is taught through
lectures, cases, discussions and group work in class as well as
student presentations. Guest lecturers from companies and other
organizations provide the students with practical examples of some
of the challenges involved in sustainable business. By drawing on
the experience of these practitioners and on recent developments
within research on sustainable business, the course enhances
students’ abilities to analytically address the issue of
sustainable business. |
| Student workload |
| Preparation |
165 hours |
| Teaching |
36 hours |
| Examination |
24 hours |
|
| Expected literature |
|
Preliminary list of readings:
- Friedman (1970):
“
The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its
Profits”. New York Times, September 13th. (Online
resource – PDF)
- Porter & Kramer
(2011):”
Creating Shared Value”, Harvard Business Review,
Jan/Feb2011, Vol. 89 Issue 1/2, p. 62-77.
- Crane, A, Palazzo, G, Spence, L
& Matten, D (2014), 'Contesting
the value of 'Creating Shared
Value'', California Management Review, Vol
56, no. 2: 130-153 UN Global Compact
(2010):”
Blueprint for Corporate Sustainability Leadership”
- Global Reporting Initiative
(2011):”
Sustainability Reporting Guidelines”, p. 1-41.
- Searcy and Elkhawas
(2012):”
Corporate sustainability ratings: an investigation into how
corporations use the Dow Jones Sustainability Index”,Journal of
Cleaner Production, Vol 35, p 79-92
- Hockerts & Moir
(2004):”
Communicating Corporate Responsibility to Investors: The
changing Role of the Investor Relations Function”, Journal of
Business Ethics, 52: 85-98
- Doganova & Karnøe
(2012):
Assembling environmental concerns and economic worth in clean-tech
markets. Paper presented at the 2nd Interdisciplinary Market
Studies Workshop, June 7-8, Dublin, Ireland.
- Arleta A.A. Majoch, Andreas G.F. Hoepner and Tessa Hebb (2014)
Sources of Stakeholder Salience in the Responsible Investment
Movement: Why do investors sign the Principles for Responsible
Investment? [SSRN,
http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2487351]
- Pedersen
(2009):”
The many and the few: Rounding up the SME's that manage
CSR in supply chains”, Supply Chain Management, Vol 14, Iss 2:
p. 109-116.
- Pedersen and Andersen
(2006):”
Safeguarding Corporate Social Responsibilities (CSR) in
global supply chains: How codes of conducts are managed in
buyer-supplier relationships”, Journal of Public Affairs, vol
6: p. 288-240.
- Morsing, Schultz and Nielsen
(2008):”
The 'Catch 22' of communicating CSR: Findings from a
Danish study”, Journal of Marketing Communications, Vol. 14, No
2: p. 97-111.
- Matten & Moon
(2008):”
’Implicit’ and ‘Explicit’ CSR: A conceptual framework for a
comparative understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility”,
Academy of Management Review 2008, Vol. 33, No. 2: p. 404–424.
- Mitchell, R.K., Agle B.R.& Wood, J. (1997):
“
Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience:
Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts”, The
Academy of Management Review, Vol. 22, No. 4 (Oct., 1997): pp.
853-886.
- Freeman & Wicks (2007):”Managing for stakeholders”, Chapter
1 of “Managing for stakeholders survival, reputation and success”,
p. 1-19.
- AccountAbility (2011):
“
AA1000 Stakeholder engagement standard”.
- Webb, Kernaghan (2012) ISO 26000: Bridging the Public/Private
Divide in Transnational Business Governance Interactions,
Osgoode Hall Law School Research Paper Series, Research
Paper No. 21/2012, forthcoming in Journal of Transnational Legal
Theory Vol. 6 No. 2 (2015)
|
Permalink