2020/2021 KAN-CCMVV4069U Global Strategy: Managing risks and seizing opportunities in a turbulent world
English Title | |
Global Strategy: Managing risks and seizing opportunities in a turbulent world |
Course information |
|
Language | English |
Course ECTS | 7.5 ECTS |
Type | Elective |
Level | Full Degree Master |
Duration | One Quarter |
Start time of the course | First Quarter |
Timetable | Course schedule will be posted at calendar.cbs.dk |
Study board |
Study Board for MSc in Economics and Business
Administration
|
Course coordinator | |
|
|
Main academic disciplines | |
|
|
Teaching methods | |
|
|
Last updated on 04-06-2020 |
Relevant links |
Learning objectives | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Upon completion of the course, and against the
backdrop of the course literature in its entirety, the student
should be able to:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Examination | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Course content, structure and pedagogical approach | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In recent years, climate changes, geopolitical instability, cyberattacks, and disruptive technologies have made the global business environment considerably more turbulent and unpredictable. In which ways are international firms responding to this increased turbulence and uncertainty? The course outlines different strategic options for risk mitigation available to firms that operate globally or contemplate to do so. Placing the student in the seat of the manager, the course revolves around the basic questions of how managers can mitigate risk and how they can seize the opportunities associated with turbulence and uncertainty. The answering of these questions confronts the student/manager with several managerial trade-offs, such as those between incurring risk preclusion- and risk remediation-related expenses, or between cost efficiency and imitability of location flexibility - tradeoffs that have to be balanced and possibly changed. Course structure: The course is introduced with a definition and account of the key construct ‘uncertainty’. . Three learning modules, each dealing with a distinct risk management strategy, follow the introduction: (i) “The safeguarding strategy” in which the firm aims for containment of risk; (ii) “The agility strategy” where the firm creates options for managing risk; and (iii) “The embracing strategy” in which the firm is thriving from risk. A final session summarizes the course takeaways and evaluates the learning outcome of the course. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description of the teaching methods | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This course consists of 11 lectures of 3 times 45
minutes in each session. In the lectures there is an emphasis on
open discussions and we will use a mixture of theory and cases. The
lectures include a ‘Dilemma of the day’, which is related to the
theories and concepts discussed in the lecture, followed by an
in-class discussion of this dilemma.
The last 45 minutes of each lecture (with the exception of the lectures in the first week) are allocated to student presentations of case synopses. Groups of students are asked to give a 15-minute case analysis, applying the concepts and theories discussed in the course so far. For each session, the topics on which the case presentation should focus will be posted on Learn. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Feedback during the teaching period | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Students get the opportunity to practice the case synopsis in class. They will receive feedback from both the teachers and their peers. The students are encouraged to choose their own case, but the questions that should be answered in the presentation are provided on Learn beforehand. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Student workload | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected literature | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Christopher, M. and Holweg, M. (2011). ““Supply chain 2.0”: Managing supply chains in the era of turbulence”. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41, 63-82. Darendeli, I. S., & Hill, T. L. (2016). Uncovering the complex relationships between political risk and MNE firm legitimacy: Insights from Libya. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(1), 68-92. Jensen, P.D.Ø. & Petersen, B. (2013). Global sourcing of services: Risk, process, and collaborative architecture. Global Strategy Journal, 3(1), 67-87 Jensen, P.D.Ø., Manning, S. & Petersen, B. (2019). Location flexibility and risk mitigation in global sourcing. Working Paper, Copenhagen Business School. Kobrin, S. J. (1979). Political risk: A review and reconsideration. Journal of International Business Studies, 10(1), 67-80. Kumar, K., van Fenema, P. C. & von Glinow, M. A. (2009). Offshoring and the global distribution of work: Implications for task interdependence theory and practice. Journal of International Business Studies, 40, 642-667. Manners-Bell, J. (2018). Supply Chain Risk Management (2nd ed.). KoganPage, London. Stabell, C. B. & Fjeldstad, Ø. D. (1998) Configuring value for competitive advantage: On chains, shops, and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 413-437. Stringfellow, A., Teagarden, M. B. & Nie, W. (2008). Invisible costs in offshoring services work. Journal of Operations Management, 26, 164-179.
Witte, C. T., Burger, M. J., Ianchovichina, E. I., & Pennings, E. (2017). Dodging bullets: The heterogeneous effect of political violence on greenfield FDI. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(7), 862-892. |