2010/2011 KAN-CM_J41 Strategy Execution
English Title | |
Strategy Execution |
Course Information | |
Language | English |
Point | 7,5 ECTS (225 SAT) |
Type | Elective |
Level | Full Degree Master |
Duration | One Quarter |
Course Period |
Spring
.
Third Quarter
|
Time Table | Please see course schedule at e-Campus |
Max. participants | 70 |
Study Board |
Study Board for BSc in Economics and Business Administration |
Course Coordinator | |
Nicolai Pogrebnyakov - nip.int@cbs.dkSecretary Marianne Christensen - mc.int@cbs.dk | |
Main Category of the Course | |
| |
Last updated on 29 maj 2012 |
Learning Objectives | |||||
The course’s development of personal competences: At the end of this course, students will be able to: • Demonstrate an understanding of issues involved in successful strategy execution, taking into account processes, actors and constraints involved. • Suggest a plan for executing a given strategy based on the factors discussed in the class. • Articulate and persuasively explain and defend a position on dealing with multiple issues involved in strategy execution. • Demonstrate an appreciation of the impact of the interorganizational and global context on strategy execution.
| |||||
Examination | |||||
Take-home case analysis. | |||||
| |||||
Examination | |||||
Prerequisites for Attending the Exam | |||||
Course Content | |||||
This course focuses on various issues in strategy execution, or implementation. It systematically reviews challenges arising in the process of executing strategy and approaches to resolving these challenges. Strategy execution in collaboration with other organizations and at the global level is also discussed. While much of the course takes place in the business settings, the body of knowledge it provides easily applies to other settings, including government and non-profit organizations. The course aims to close the gap between the formulation of strategy, for which a generous number of frameworks exists, and achieving results envisioned by strategic planning. Sound strategic plans often underperform in practice thanks to the lack of consideration put into the execution process. This course brings students’ attention to this process by putting them in the position of a manager who deals with the various dimensions of the strategy execution process. The course is targeted at students whose future career may involve implementing decisions at the organizational, interorganizational and team levels. It will also be useful for those with a general interest in strategy-related issues. | |||||
Teaching Methods | |||||
This course is taught in Harvard-style case method, which involves energetic class discussion and interaction. Case discussions are complemented by brief lectures that summarize and provide additional insights on the class topic. The bulk of student knowledge will develop through in-class case discussions. Thus preparation and class participation are essential if you want to do well in the course. | |||||
Literature | |||||
Nohria, N., Joyce, W. and Roberson, B. (2003). “What really works.” Harvard Business Review, 81(7), 42—52. Kaplan , R. S. and Norton, D. P. (1996). “Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system.” Harvard Business Review, 74(1), 75—85. Griswold, H. M. and Prenovitz, S. C. (1993). “How to translate strategy into operational results.” Business Forum, 18(3), 5—9. Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. P. (2006). “How to implement a new strategy without disrupting your organization.” Harvard Business Review, 84(3), 100—109. Neilson, G. L., Martin, K. L. and Powers, E. (2008). “The secrets to successful strategy execution.” Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 60—70. Evans, P. and Wolf, B. (2005). “Collaboration rules.” Harvard Business Review, 83(7/8), 96—104. Ford, J. D. and Ford, L. W. (2009). “Decoding resistance to change.” Harvard Business Review, 87(4), 99—103. Bower, J. L. and Gilbert, C. G. (2007). “How managers’ everyday decisions create or destroy your company's strategy.” Harvard Business Review, 85(2), 72—79. Pfeffer, J. (1994). “Location in the communication network.” In Managing with Power, Boston, MA, Harvard Business School Press, 111—125. Krackhardt, D. and Hanson, J. R. (1993). “Informal networks: the company behind the chart.” Harvard Business Review, July/August, 104—111. Friedman, T. L. (2005). “It’s a flat world, after all.” The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/03/magazine/03DOMINANCE.html?pagewanted=all&position= Friedman, T. L. (2005). “Why the world is flat.” Wired, 13.05. http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/13.05/friedman_pr.html Ghemawat, P. (2005). “Regional strategies for global leadership.” Harvard Business Review, 83(12), 98—108. Narayanan, V. G. and Raman, A. (2004). “Aligning incentives in supply chains.” Harvard Business Review, 82(11), 94—102. |