2010/2011 KAN-CM_J68 Global Strategy and Technology
English Title | |
Global Strategy and Technology |
Course Information | |
Language | English |
Point | 7,5 ECTS (225 SAT) |
Type | Elective |
Level | Full Degree Master |
Duration | One Quarter |
Course Period |
Spring
.
Third Quarter
|
Time Table | Please see course schedule at e-Campus |
Max. participants | 70 |
Study Board |
Study Board for BSc in Economics and Business Administration |
Course Coordinator | |
Nicolai Pogrebnyakov - nip.int@cbs.dkSecretary Marianne Christensen - mc.int@cbs.dk | |
Main Category of the Course | |
| |
Last updated on 29 maj 2012 |
Learning Objectives | |||||
At the end of this course, students will be able to: • Demonstrate an understanding of the value added by technology to the international firm. • Identify specific mechanisms of value creation and be able to take into consideration technology-related issues when formulating company strategy. • Articulate and persuasively explain and defend a position on a chosen technology strategy of a firm. • Understand issues involved in launching and offering technology services and products globally.
| |||||
Examination | |||||
Take-home case analysis. | |||||
| |||||
Examination | |||||
Prerequisites for Attending the Exam | |||||
Course Content | |||||
This course focuses on strategic issues firms face in the use of technology and development of technology innovations in global markets. It examines two levels: the business and the customer. The business part focuses on how technology can be used to add value to the business, assist in a globalized innovation process and tap into new and unconventional sources of creativity and expertise. The customer part examines strategy in technology products and services, with the focus on the global appeal of technology and business models in the development and post-launch phases of technology products and services. The course is targeted at students whose future career may involve a general understanding of strategic technology issues. It would also be valuable for those with an interest or background in the technology industry who want to understand strategic challenges facing companies there. That said, no technology background is required. The course emphasizes business over technology-specific issues. | |||||
Teaching Methods | |||||
This course is taught in Harvard-style case method, which involves energetic class discussion and interaction. Case discussions are complemented by brief lectures that summarize and provide additional insights on the class topic. The bulk of student knowledge will develop through in-class case discussions. Thus preparation and class participation are essential if you want to do well in the course. | |||||
Literature | |||||
McAfee, A. (2006). “Mastering the three worlds of information technology.” Harvard Business Review. Nolan, R. and McFarlan, W. (2005). “Information technology and the board of directors.” Harvard Business Review. Carr, N. (2003). “IT doesn’t matter.” Harvard Business Review. Santos, J., Doz, Y. and Williamson, P. (2004). “Is your innovation process global?” MIT Sloan Management Review. Kao, J. (2009) “Tapping the world’s innovation hot spots.” Harvard Business Review. Zachary, G.P. (2008). “Inside Nairobi, the Next Palo Alto?” TheNew York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/20/business/worldbusiness/20ping.html Myers and Cheung (2008). “Sharing global supply chain knowledge.” MIT Sloan Management Review. Eisenhardt, K. M. and Sull, D. N. (2001). “Strategy as simple rules.” Harvard Business Review. Maidique, M. A. and Hayes, R. H. (1985). “The art of high-technology management.” McKinsey Quarterly. Anderson, C. (2009). “The economics of giving it away.” Wall Street Journal. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123335678420235003.html Kaganer, E. (2009). “The freemium model.” http://isblog.iese.us/2009/09/a-few-thoughts-on-the-freemium-model.html The Economist (2010). “Yammering away at the office.” Special report on social networking, pp. 14—16. Cosquer, F. J. N. and Ohayon-Dekel, A. (2009). “Mobility and Enterprise 2.0.” International Journal of Interdisciplinary Telecommunications and Networking, 1(4), 1—15. |