• Formulate problems within an organizational context
• Relate problems to the concepts that are discussed in the course
• Describe, classify, structure, and combine the concepts, theories, methods, and models of the course
• Relate the texts of the course to their theoretical context
• Exemplify the chosen problem through the use of case-material

Organizational Philosophy introduces to the student a specific philosophical practice in regards to the analysis of organizations, and maps out what differentiates this from both classical philosophy on the one hand and classical organizational analysis on the other hand.

The goal is to introduce the basic concepts and analytical tools that may become the student’s later professional profile. The predominantly contemporary curriculum mirrors the ambition of enabling the student to identify problems, conflicts, challenges and potentials within organizations of various kinds. This happens as the organization construes its images of itself in a culturally predicated context and delimits itself from its environment.

It is also and at the same time the intention of the course to enable the student to give a philosophical answer to the question which practices and social activities such problematic self-images and delimitations give rise to, and how these may be transgressed.

The course will give an introduction to organizational philosophy and demonstrate how philosophy provides fundamentally new and different ways of conceptualizing and analyzing organizations and organizational phenomena. The course will consist of lectures and cases, but the active participation of the students is a prerequisite for its success.

Agamben, G. (2007): “In Praise of Profanation”, in: Profanation, New York: Zone Books
Agamben, G. (2010): “What is a Paradigm?”, in: The Signature of All Things, New York: Zone Books.
Castel R. (1994): “’Problematization’ as a mode of reading history”, in: Foucault and the Writing of History, Oxford: Cambridge  Mass.: Blackwell, p. 237–52.
Costea B, Crump N. & Holm J. (2006): “Conceptual History and the Interpretation of Managerial Ideologies”, Management & Organizational History, 1;1(2): 159–75.
Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1994): “What is a concept?”, in: What is Philosophy?, London: Verso.
Deleuze, G. (1990): “The Simulacrum & Ancient Philosophy”, in: Logic of Sense, New York: Columbia University Press.
Foucault M. (1986): “Kant on Enlightenment and revolution”, Economy and Society, 15(1): 88–96.
Jones C. & Spicer A. (2005): “The Sublime Object of Entrepreneurship”, Organization, 12(2): 223–46.
Jones, C. (2002): “Foucault's Inheritance/Inheriting Foucault”, Culture and Organization, 8(3): 225-238.
Latour B. (2004): “Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern”, Critical Inquiry, 30(2): 225–48.
May, T. (2005): “How might one live”, in:Gilles Deleuze - An introduction, Cambridge University Press.
Meindl J. R. (1995): “The romance of leadership as a follower-centric theory: A social constructionist approach”, The Leadership Quarterly, 6(3): 329–41.
Munro, I. (2005): “The Mythic Foundations of Organization”, in: S. Linstead and A. Linstead (eds.), Thinking Organization, London: Routledge.
Mintzberg, H. (1990): “The Manager’s Job – Folklore and Facts”, Harvard Business Review (March).
Serres, M. “Theory of the Quasi-Object”, in: The Parasite, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
Sliwa, M; Spoelstra, S.; Land, C.; Sørensen, B. M. (forthcoming): “Profaning the sacred in leadership studies: A reading of Murakami’s A Wild Sheep Chase”, 20 s.
Sørensen, B. M. & Spoelstra, S. (2012): “Play at work: continuation, intervention and usurpation”, Organization, 19(1): 81-97.
Spoelstra, S. (2007): “Philosophy”, in: What is organization?, Lund: Lund Business.
Žižek, S. (2006): “From che vuoi? to fantasy - Lacan with Eyes wide Shut”, in: How to read Lacan, W.W. London: Norton & Company.