2012/2013 KAN-SMC_SM56 Managing Knowledge, Projects and Teams
English Title | |
Managing Knowledge, Projects and Teams |
Course information |
|
Language | English |
Exam ECTS | 7.5 ECTS |
Type | Mandatory |
Level | Full Degree Master |
Duration | One Semester |
Course period | Spring |
Time Table | Please see course schedule at e-Campus |
Study board |
Study Board for MSc in Economics and Business
Administration
|
Course coordinator | |
|
|
Karin Tollin | |
Main Category of the Course | |
|
|
Last updated on 09-07-2012 |
Learning objectives | |||||||||||||||||
At the end of the course the
excellent student is expected to be able to:1. Describe, classify
and explain theoretical perspectives and strategies on knowledge
creation and knowledge management in the literature.
2. Structure, discuss and explain socio-cultural issues related to the managing and sharing of knowledge in projects and in teams. 3. Describe and explain main issues, considerations and decision with respect to the initiation, the implementation and the termination of projects aimed to implement a strategy oriented on innovation. 4. Select, illustrate and discuss the contribution of different tools (constructs, frameworks etc.) in the field of knowledge and project management in order to successfully manage innovation processes at a project and team level. 5. Integrate the construct of knowledge management, as it is presented in the contemporary literature, with that of project management and thereby reflect, argue and propose on the implication from a corporate/strategic perspective and from the perspective of a project manager. |
|||||||||||||||||
Examination | |||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Course content | |||||||||||||||||
Corporate level managers of marketing are in most sectors of the
industry pushed by their companies’ CEO to come up with new ideas
for market growth opportunities, and to continuously find ‘better’
ways to organise and to lead projects. Due to this, they spend a
great deal of their time, and effort, in identifying project
managers, and in developing team-building models, tools and
processes. However, the problem is that despite their effort,
projects tend to be carried out in a traditional, a repetitive way.
According to the contemporary literature in the field of strategy,
learning and project management, one explanation to a reluctance to
change ‘the way things get done’ lies in a failure to recognize
that leading and managing projects are two different things, and
that project management needs to become strategic, although it also
consists of collection of management tools and practices. The
overall objective of the course relates to this proposition.
Additionally, it relates to the literature that proposes that
managing innovation projects is in essence about knowledge
management.
|
|||||||||||||||||
Teaching methods | |||||||||||||||||
The course consists of lectures,
case-works and a 4 hour written exam.
|
|||||||||||||||||
Expected literature | |||||||||||||||||
Knowledge Management - An Integrated Approach, Ashok Jashapara,
2004, Prentice Hall.
|