| 
          
            
              | Examination: |  
              | Examination form | Oral exam based on written product 
 
 In order to participate in the oral exam, the written product
must be handed in before the oral exam; by the set deadline. The
grade is based on an overall assessment of the written product and
the individual oral performance. |  
              | Individual or group exam | Group exam, max. 5 students in the
group |  
              | Size of written product | Max. 15 pages |  
              |  | If written individually the project must be max.
10 pages. |  
              | Assignment type | Project |  
              | Duration | Written product to be submitted on specified date and
time.20 min. per student, including examiners' discussion of grade,
and informing plus explaining the grade |  
              | Grading scale | 7-step scale |  
              | Examiner(s) | Internal examiner and second internal
examiner |  
              | Exam period | October |  
              | Make-up exam/re-exam | Same examination form as the ordinary exam If a student is ill during the
regular oral exam, he/she will be able to re-use the project at the
make-up exam. If a student is ill during the writing of the project
and did not contribute to the project, the make-up exam can be
written individually or in groups (provided that other students are
taking the make-up/re-exam). If the student did not pass the
regular exam, he/she must make a new revised project (confer advice
from the examiner) and hand it in on a new deadline specified by
the secretariat. |  
              | Description of the exam
procedure 
 As regards the oral exam the
following exams requirements apply:
Students must, in a mini-project, demonstrate his/her ability
through a combination of theory, methods and empirical material to
provide an in-depth study of a problem of scientific relevance
within the required literature of the
course.
 |  | 
    
      | 
          Please note that the litterature list is guiding
 Books for purchase in the CBS book shop:
 
          Caves, R (2000), Creative Industries: Contracts Between Art
and Commerce, Cambrige, MA: Harvard University PressHesmondhalgh, D (2002), The Cultural Industries,
London: SAGE. 
          Cases for download:
         
          Case 1, One size does not fit allCase 2,Is creativity always enough? 
          Assignments for download:
         
          Workshop 1 AssignmentWorkshop 2 AssignmentMini Conference Assignment 
          Articles for download:
         
          Lorenzen et al. (2010), Creativity and creative industries,
excerpts from “Creativity, value, and organization”, forthcoming in
Jones, Lorenzen and Sapsed (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Creative
Industries, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Eikhof and Haunschild (2006), Lifestyle meets market: Bohemian
entrepreneurs in creative industries, Creativity and Innovation
Management, 15/2: 234-241.Mintzberg, H. (1987), The strategy concept I: five P's for
strategy, California Management Review, Vol. 30 No.1,
pp.11-24.Goodman, R.A.; Goodman, L.P. (1976): Some Management Issues in
Temporary Systems: A Study of Professional Development and Manpower
- The Theatre Case, American Journal of Sociology:
494-501Faulkner, Robert R. and Anderson, Andy B. (1987): Short-Term
Projects and Emergent Careers: Evidence from Hollywood,
American Journal of Sociology, vol 92, no. 4 (January
1987): 879-909Winch and Schneider (1993): Managing the knowledge-based
organization: The case of architectural practice, Journal of
Management Studies, Nov 93, Vol. 30.Hill and Johnson (2003): When Creativity is a must:
professional “Applied Creative” Services, Creativity and
innovation management, 12, 4, December 2003Lorenzen and Frederiksen (2005)The Management of Projects and
Product Experimentation: Examples from the Music Industry,
European Management Review, vol 2, no. 3.Whitley, R (2006) Project-based firms: new organizational form
or variations on a theme? Industrial and Corporate
Change2006 15(1):77-99Grabher (2002): Cool projects, boring institutions: Temporary
collaboration in social context, Regional Studies, vol. 36,no.
3.Maskell and Lorenzen (2004)The Cluster as Market Organization,
Urban Studies, vol. 41, no. 5/6: 975-993.DeFillippi, R and M B Arthur (1998), Paradox in Project-Based
Enterprise: The Case of Film Making, California Management
Review vol. 40, no. 2.J. Lampel, T. Lant and J. Shamsie, “Balancing act: learning
from organizing practices in cultural industries,” Organization
Science, Vol. 11, No. 3 (2000), 263-269.Lorenzen, M and L Frederiksen (2006), Experimental pop music:
Product innovation in the project ecology of the pop music
industry, in Hearn (ed.), If your Company were a Cockroach: How
to survive in the new business ecology, Brisbane: Queensland
University of Technology: 43-58. |