2015/2016 KAN-CCMVV2506U The Business of Smart Cities: Value Creation in Urban Innovation Environments
English Title | |
The Business of Smart Cities: Value Creation in Urban Innovation Environments |
Course information |
|
Language | English |
Course ECTS | 7.5 ECTS |
Type | Elective |
Level | Full Degree Master |
Duration | One Quarter |
Start time of the course | Second Quarter |
Timetable | Course schedule will be posted at calendar.cbs.dk |
Max. participants | 60 |
Study board |
Study Board for MSc in Economics and Business
Administration
|
Course coordinator | |
|
|
Kontaktinformation: https://e-campus.dk/studium/kontakt eller Contact information: https://e-campus.dk/studium/kontakt | |
Main academic disciplines | |
|
|
Last updated on 11-03-2015 |
Learning objectives | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
To achieve the grade 12, students
should meet the following learning objectives with no or only minor
mistakes or errors:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Examination | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Course content and structure | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
This course is on business development and innovation environments in today’s cities. Special attention is put on so-called ‘smart cities’. The ‘smart city’ notion has displaced ‘sustainable city’ and ‘digital city’ as the word of choice to denote advanced urban infrastructure based on information and communications technology (ICT). Smart cities evolve along with new modes of value creation through the intermediation of public-private partnerships, cross-sectoral collaboration, city-led “open innovation marketplaces” and other forms of governance.
More generally, ICT applications empowers consumers in the urban marketplace as well as citizens in the wider society. The course participants will be introduced to a series of smart city cases at the level of the business firm, the city and the city district as well as at the regional level.
Special attention in the course will be placed at collaborative spaces within the urban fabric. Increasingly, a rising number of startups and innovative firms, along with entrepreneurs and young professionals, congregate in compact, resourceful enclaves in the smart city. They co-locate with other firms, R&D labs and universities in order to share ideas, produce new solutions and practice more “open innovation.” Third Generation Science Parks, business incubators and urban innovation districts are examples of organized manifestations of the mega-trends altering the location preferences of people and firms more to the center of the smart city. Many science parks in Europe are being moved to city areas or being urbanized.
Within such urban contexts, the course participants will explore business firms and entrepreneurial organizations that master intangible assets (‘hidden resources and capabilities’) when shaping strategy, managing innovation and incremental change for the purpose of creating value.
This course represents a contribution also to the ‘science of cities’, which is emerging as an inter-disciplinary field of study and related practices. New concepts, models and analytical approaches are being advanced and tested against an increasingly complex reality.
From a management perspective, the course participants will be offered a variety of analytical approaches to identify, measure and assess intangibles in business firms and other organizations and in collaborative networks among companies. We will discuss how to put intangibles into effective use, thereby also promoting more ‘knowledge-intensive’ or ‘intelligent’ organizations to succeed in a swiftly changing urban environment, which could be highly competitive and connected to the world market. Emphasis is put on several methods of managing intangible resources and capabilities in large corporations and public institutions as well as in small and medium-sized business enterprises, including start-up firms.
The course is practical in orientation by exploring case material from comparative studies of firms, institutions and different types of innovation districts in cities on three continents. Case material is drawn from smart city business environments in Barcelona and Milano, Copenhagen and Stockholm, London and Birmingham, Shanghai and Shenzhen, Chengdu and Harbin, Singapore and Saigon, Boston and New York. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Teaching methods | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Teaching format, course elements and
learning methods:
The course pools several types of learning activity. It is based on individual readings and combines lectures with group work and plenary discussions, plus case presentations. Workshop activities connected with the plenary sessions are essential for reaching the learning objectives of the course. When case presentations are discussed, the students will be able to introduce their own project ideas and draft documents that could be edited into a synopsis for the individual examination. The course builds on continuous interaction during the course period of eight weeks with other CBS teachers, external experts and resource persons from business and the public sector. Quality enhancement: Course participants will benefit from a quality assurance approach, developed at the CBS to make this course more relevant and adaptive to changing student demands. An elected group of course participants will support the course coordinator and the lecturers in securing a high level of quality and relevance of the contents of the course. The work of the quality assurance group (which meets briefly every week – immediately after class) will be pro-active and benefit from the flexible course organization. The quality assurance group should influence positively also the week-by-week planning of the joint course work. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Student workload | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected literature | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Examples of readings:
Ahrend, R. et al (2014). What Makes Cities More Productive? OECD Regional Development Working Papers 2014/05.
Annerstedt, J. (2006). ”Science Parks and HighTech Clustering” in the International Handbook of Industrial Policy. Ed. by P. Bianchi & S. Labory. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar: pp. 279297.
Bakhshi, H., A. Freeman & P. Higgs, D. J. (2013). A Dynamic Mapping of the UK’s Creative Industries, London: NESTA.
Deloitte (2013). Shift Index Methology. San José, Deloitte Center for the Edge.
Fernandes, J. R. & P Chamusca (2014). Urban policies, planning and retail resilience, Cities 36, pp. 170–177.
Glaeser. E. (2005) Reinventing Boston: 1640-2003, Journal of Economic Geography, 5, pp. 119-153.
International Integrated Reporting Council (2013). The International <IR> Framework, London: IIRC.
Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton (2004). Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes. Boston, Harvard Business School Press.
Katz, B & J. Wagner (2014). The Rise of Innovation Districts: A New Geography of Innovation in America, Washington DC: Brookings.
Krugman, P. (1996). The Self-Organising Economy, Oxford: Blackwell
Landry, C. & J. Hyams (2012). The Creative City Index, London: Comedia
Mortensen, J et al (eds) (2012), Danish Smart Cities: Sustainable Living in an Urban World. An Overview of Danish Smart City Competencies, Copenhagen: Copenhagen Capacity & Copenhagen Cleantech Cluster.
Paolo Neirotti, P et al (2014). Current trends in Smart City initiatives: Some stylised facts, Cities 38 (2014) 25–36.
Porter, M. (1995). The Competitive Advantage of the Inner City, Harvard Business Review, 73 (3), pp. 55-71. |