English   Danish

2016/2017  KAN-CCMVI2050U  Logistics and Supply Chain Concepts

English Title
Logistics and Supply Chain Concepts

Course information

Language English
Course ECTS 7.5 ECTS
Type Elective
Level Full Degree Master
Duration Summer
Start time of the course Summer
Timetable Course schedule will be posted at calendar.cbs.dk
Max. participants 80
Study board
Study Board for MSc in Economics and Business Administration
Course coordinator
  • Course instructor - Miguel Suarez, MSc. MBA, Vienna University of Economics and Business, msv.acc@cbs.dk
    Sven Bislev - Department of Management, Society and Communication (MSC)
In case of any academic questions related to the course, please contact the course instructor or the academic director, Sven Bislev at sb.ikl@cbs.dk.
Main academic disciplines
  • Supply chain management and logistics
Last updated on 29/05/2017
Learning objectives
To achieve the grade 12, students should meet the following learning objectives with no or only minor mistakes or errors: At the end of the course, students shall be able to:
  • Explain how companies can use supply chain management to gain competitive advantage
  • Describe the major types of supply chain strategies and their implementation challenges
  • Explain how segmentation, product variety and integration impact the performance of a supply chain
Course prerequisites
Basic knowledge of supply chain management
Examination
Logistics and Supply Chain Concepts:
Exam ECTS 7.5
Examination form Written sit-in exam
Individual or group exam Individual exam
Assignment type Written assignment
Duration 4 hours
Grading scale 7-step scale
Examiner(s) One internal examiner
Exam period Summer, Ordinary exam: End of July - beginning of August 2017.

Retake exam: End of September - beginning of October 2017.

3rd attempt (2nd retake) exam: End November - beginning of December 2017.

Exam schedule is available on http://www.cbs.dk/summer http:/​/​www.cbs.dk/​uddannelse/​summer-university-programme/​exam.
Aids allowed to bring to the exam Closed book: no aids
Make-up exam/re-exam
Same examination form as the ordinary exam
If the number of registered candidates for the make-up examination/re-take examination warrants that it may most appropriately be held as an oral examination, the programme office will inform the students that the make-up examination/re-take examination will be held as an oral examination instead.
4 hour written sit-in exam, new exam question
Exam form for 3rd attempt (2nd retake): 72 hours home project assignment, max. 10 pages.
Course content and structure

The course explains how a company can gain competitive advantage through supply chain management. Lean and agile supply chain strategies are explained in detail as well as the different supply chain challenges like segmentation, integration, product variety and lead times. Within the course, two company case studies will be explained in detail to show practical examples how supply chain decisions can impact company competitiveness.

 

Session 1:            Supply chain definitions

Session 2:            Supply chain relationships

Session 3:            Supply chains and competitive advantage

Session 4:            Lean supply chains

Session 5:            A lean case study: SpiceCo

Session 6:            Agile supply chains

Session 7:            An agile case study: CrystalCo

Session 8:            The product variety challenge

Session 9:            The segmentation challenge

Session 10:          The integration challenge

Session 11:          Review

Teaching methods
Normal class activities will be a combination of lecture, discussion, and assignments.
Students are expected to read the relevant materials prior to the class meeting. The instructor assumes the student already knows the basic concepts, ensuring their comprehension by placing individual questions and providing examples of practical applications.
Student workload
Preliminary assignment 10 hours
Classroom attendance 33 hours
Preparation 144 hours
Feedback activity 7 hours
Examination 12 hours
Further Information

Preliminary Assignment: To help students get maximum value from ISUP courses, instructors provide a reading or a small number of readings or video clips to be read or viewed before the start of classes with a related task scheduled for class 1 in order to 'jump-start' the learning process.

 

Feedback Activity: A feedback activity defined by the course instructor will take place approx. half-way through the course.

 

Course timetable is available on http://www.cbs.dk/uddannelse/summer-university-programme/courses.

Expected literature

Reading List

 

Session 3: Supply chains and competitive advantage

Lee H. (2004) “The triple-A Supply Chain”, Harvard Business Review, October 2004

Naylor J.B., Naim M.M., Berry D. (1999) “Leagility: integrating the lean and the agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain”, International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 62, no.1, pp.107-118

 

Session 4: Lean supply chains

Hines P., Holweg M., Rich N., (2004),"Learning to evolve: A review of contemporary lean thinking", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 24 Iss 10 pp. 994 - 1011

 

Session 6: Agile supply chains

Christopher M., Holweg M. (2011) “Supply chain 2.0: managing supply chains in the era of turbulence”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 63-82

Christopher M., Towill D. (2001) “An integrated model for the design of agile supply chains”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, vol. 31, no.4, pp 253

Van Hoek R., Harrison A., Christopher M. (2001) “Measuring agile capabilities in the supply chain”, International Journal of Operations Management, vol. 21, no. 1, pp.126-47

 

Session 8: The product variety challenge

Ahlström P., Westbrook R. (1999) “Implications for mass customization for operations management”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, vol. 19, no.3, 1999, pp 262-275

Gilmore J.H., Pine II B.J. (1997) “The Four Faces of Mass Customization”, Harvard Business Review, Jan – Feb 1997

Harrison A., Skipworth H. (2006) “Implications of form postponement to manufacturing a customized product “, International Journal of Production, vol.44, 2006, issue 8

Pil F., Holweg M. (2004) “Linking product variety to order-fulfilment strategies”, Interfaces, vol.43, no.5, Sep-Oct, pp 394-403

Skipworth H., Harrison A. (2004) “Implications from postponement to manufacturing: A cross case comparison” International Journal of Production Research, vol.42, issue 10, May 2004, pp. 2043-2081

 

Session 9: The segmentation challenge

Aitken J., Childerhouse P., Christopher M., Towill D. (2005) “Designing and Managing Multiple Pipelines”, Journal of Business Logistics, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 73-96

Childerhouse P., Aitken J., Towill D. (2002) “Analysis and design of focused demand chains”, Journal of Operations Management, vol.20, no.6, pp. 675-689

Godsell J., Diefenbach T., Clemmow C., Towill D., Christopher M. (2010) “Enabling supply chain segmentation through demand profiling”, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, vol.41, no. 3, 2011, pp. 296-314

 

Session 10: The integration challenge

Attaran M., Attaran S. (2007) “Collaborative Supply Chain Management: The most promising practice for building efficient and sustainable supply chains”, Business Process Management Journal, vol. 13, no. 3, May 2007, pp. 390 – 404

Barratt M., Oliveira A. (2001) “Exploring the experiences of collaborative planning initiatives”, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, vol. 31, issue 4

Frohlich M., Westbrook R. (2001) “Arcs of integration: an international study of supply chain strategies”, Journal of Operations Management, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 185-200

Lambert D., Emmelhainz M., Gardner J. (1996) “Developing and implementing Supply Chain Partnerships”, The international Journal of Logistics management 7(2): 1-18.

Oliva R., Watson N. (2010) “Cross functional planning in supply chain planning: A case study of sales and operations planning”, Journal of Operations Management, 29 (2011), pp. 434-448

Last updated on 29/05/2017