2017/2018 KAN-CSIEO1701U Business: Concepts and Prototypes
English Title | |
Business: Concepts and Prototypes |
Course information |
|
Language | English |
Course ECTS | 7.5 ECTS |
Type | Mandatory |
Level | Full Degree Master |
Duration | One Quarter |
Start time of the course | Autumn |
Timetable | Course schedule will be posted at calendar.cbs.dk |
Study board |
Study Board for MSc in Social Sciences
|
Course coordinator | |
|
|
Main academic disciplines | |
|
|
Last updated on 26-06-2017 |
Relevant links |
Learning objectives | ||||||||||||||||||||||
To achieve the grade 12, students should meet the
following learning objectives with no or only minor mistakes or
errors: The student should be able to :
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Prerequisites for registering for the exam | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of mandatory
activities: 1
Compulsory assignments
(assessed approved/not approved)
A mandatory assignment that is due in week 6 of the course.The mandatory assignment is graded pass/failed by one examiner on an individual basis. A pass is required to participate in the regular exam. The retake exam is also an assignment. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Examination | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Course content and structure | ||||||||||||||||||||||
This course offers theories of value creation from social construction and process perspectives. It utilizes various frameworks (value proposition and prototyping) and processes (i.e., concept development and testing; feasibility; product, service and participatory design) for developing ideas into concrete business concepts and organizational forms. The class is taught in a studio format. Based on knowledge gained from: assigned readings, short lectures and cases, class discussions and group exercises; the class develops, modifies and refines a series of business concepts and product/service prototypes that will serve as inputs for evaluating the feasibility of a particular idea. Students (either alone or in teams) will be responsible for developing and refining a business concept and a prototype for a specific idea during the term.
The outcome of this process will be the Mandatory Assignment. The Mandatory Assignment is graded as “Pass/Fail” on an individual basis. Students must receive a “Pass” before being allowed to take the Final Exam. The Final Exam will be a 10-page take home assignment. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Teaching methods | ||||||||||||||||||||||
studio teaching | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Feedback during the teaching period | ||||||||||||||||||||||
The class is taught in a studio format, where feedback is a key resource for learning. In each class session, students will be engaged in group exercises and discussions, where a series of peer-to-peer feedback tools will be practices. In each session there will also be either individual or group presentations, where feedback will be provided by students and teachers. Further, summative feedback will be given to the entire class at the beginning and end of each session, with good examples and typical mistakes highlighted by the teachers. In addition to these group-based feedback tools, students will write field diary and log books, which will be used for reflection on their learning process. Finally, office hours will provide an opportunity for group and individual feedback. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Student workload | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected literature | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Required Books to Purchase:
Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., Bernarda, G., Smith, A. & Papadakos, T. (2014). Value Proposition Design. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. (Listed as VPD in Course Schedule)
Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (List as SIA in Course Schedule)
Articles:
Ellie, C., Adams, T. E. & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An Overview. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 12 (1), Art. 10.
Wall, S. (2006). An Autoethnography on Learning about Autoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 5 (2): 1-12.
Bernd W. Wirtz, Adriano Pistoia, Sebastian Ullrich, Vincent Göttel (2016) Business Models: Origin, Development and Future Research Perspectives, Long Range Planning 49, 36-54
Magretta, Joan. (2002) Why business models matter. Harvard Business Review. 80 (5): 86-92.
Blank, S. (2013). Why the lean start-up changes everything. Harvard Business Review, 91(5): 63-72.
Morris, M., Schindehutte, M., & Allen, J. (2005). The entrepreneur's business model: toward a unified perspective. Journal of business research, 58(6), 726-735.
Pentland, A. (2012). The new science of building great teams. Harvard Business Review, 90 (4), 60-69.
Helgesson, C.F. and Kjellberg, H., 2013. Introduction: Values and valuations in market practice. Journal of Cultural Economy, 6(4), pp.361-369.
Stark, D. (2011) What’s valuable? In: The Worth of Goods: Valuation and Pricing in the Economy, edited by Patrik Aspers and Jens Beckert (Oxford University Press, 2011).
Steyaert, C. (1998) A Qualitative Methodology for Process Studies of Entrepreneurship, International Studies of Management and Organisation, 27(3): 13-33.
Hackman, J. R. (2009). Why teams don't work. Interview by Diane Coutu. Harvard Business Review, 87 (5), 98-105.
Sánchez-Fernández, R. and Iniesta-Bonillo, M.Á., 2007. The concept of perceived value: a systematic review of the research. Marketing Theory, 7 (4): 427-451.
Koptytoff, I. (1986) ‘The cultural biography of things: commoditization as process’. In: The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Fletcher, D. E. (2006). Entrepreneurial processes and the social construction of opportunity. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 18 (5): 421-440.
Fletcher, D. (2007). ‘Toy Story’: The narrative world of entrepreneurship and the creation of interpretive communities. Journal of Business Venturing, 22 (5): 649-672.
Rehn, A. and S. Vachhani. (2006). Innovation and the Post-Original: On Moral Stances and Reproduction. Creativity and Innovation Management 15 (3): 310-322.
Gersick, C. J. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management journal, 31(1): 9-41
Selden, P., & Fletcher, D. (2010). “Practical Narrativity” and the “Real-time Story” of Entrepreneurial Becoming in The Republic of Tea. An Issue about The Republic of Tea, 51.
Garud, R. Schildt, H. A. & Lant, T. K. (2014) Entrepreneurial storytelling, future expectations and the paradox of legitimacy. Organization Science. 25 (5): 1479–1492. Kelly, J. R., & Barsade, S. G. (2001). Mood and emotions in small groups and work teams. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 86 (1), 99-130.
Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (2005). The discipline of teams. Harvard Business Review, 83 (7): 162.
Supplemental Books and Materials:
You will gain some experience in visualisation and presentation methods. For further reading and exercises we suggest:
Roam: D. (2009). Unfolding the Napkin. New York: Penguin Books. (Listed as NAPKIN in Course Schedule)
The class can’t cover all of the ways that one might use design thinking to solve problems. A good book to widen your sense of design methods and ideas is:
Lidwell, W., Holden, K., & Butler, J. (2010). Universal principles of design: 125 ways to enhance usability, influence perception, increase appeal, make better design decisions, and teach through design. Rockport publishers.
If you don’t have some knowledge of accounting and finance, then, you should read this book:
Berman, K., & Knight, J. (2013). Financial intelligence for entrepreneurs: what you really need to know about the numbers. Harvard Business Press. |