2018/2019 KAN-CPOLO1801U Global Knowledge Strategies
English Title | |
Global Knowledge Strategies |
Course information |
|
Language | English |
Course ECTS | 7.5 ECTS |
Type | Mandatory |
Level | Full Degree Master |
Duration | One Quarter |
Start time of the course | Fourth Quarter |
Timetable | Course schedule will be posted at calendar.cbs.dk |
Study board |
Study Board for BSc/MSc i International Business and Politics,
MSc
|
Course coordinator | |
|
|
Main academic disciplines | |
|
|
Teaching methods | |
|
|
Last updated on 13-09-2018 |
Relevant links |
Learning objectives | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Examination | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Course content and structure | ||||||||||||||||||||||
The course aims to provide students with an understanding of today’s global knowledge strategies. To this end, the course builds on different theoretical perspectives and extensively discusses company cases. The course consists of three parts. The first part revolves around the knowledge-based view (KBV) of the firm as a theoretical lens to understand internal and external knowledge-related strategies across the globe. The second part revolves around the institution-based view (IBV) as a theoretical lens to understand the challenges formal and informal institutions pose to firm strategizing on their knowledge-related resources around the world. The third part focuses on the phenomenon of global knowledge sourcing and aims to investigate theoretically and empirically how KBV and IBV inform the drivers and effects, the geography, and the new actors involved in global knowledge strategies. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Description of the teaching methods | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Lectures, in-class cases discussion and group assignments | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Feedback during the teaching period | ||||||||||||||||||||||
The course seeks to offer feedback to students whenever feasible. Faculty staff members teaching the course are available during office hours (please, see day and time on Learn). Students are strongly encouraged to engage in class by asking questions and making comment, and to form self-study group to secure peer feedback. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Student workload | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected literature | ||||||||||||||||||||||
The literature is based on academic articles. The following texts represent examples of the reading list. Alcácer, J. (2006). Location choices across the value chain: How activity and capability influence collocation. Management Science, 52(10), 1457-1471. Berry, H., & Kaul, A. (2015). Global sourcing and foreign knowledge seeking. Management Science, 61(5), 1052-1071. D’Agostino, L. M., Laursen, K., & Santangelo, G. D. (2013) The impact of R&D offshoring on the home knowledge production of OECD investing regions. Journal ofEconomic Geography, 13(1): 145-175. Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109-122. Lewin, A. Y., Massini, S., & Peeters, C. (2009) Why are companies offshoring innovation? The emerging global race for talent. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(6): 901-925. Narula, R., & Santangelo, G. D. (2009) Location, collocation and R&D alliances in the European ICT industry. Research Policy, 38(2): 393-403. Oxley, J. E. (1999). Institutional environment and the mechanisms of governance: the impact of intellectual property protection on the structure of inter-firm alliances. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 38(3), 283-309.
|