2023/2024 BA-BBLCV1162U Scandinavian Sustainability & Corporate Social Responsibility
English Title | |
Scandinavian Sustainability & Corporate Social Responsibility |
Course information |
|
Language | English |
Course ECTS | 7.5 ECTS |
Type | Elective |
Level | Bachelor |
Duration | One Semester |
Start time of the course | Autumn |
Timetable | Course schedule will be posted at calendar.cbs.dk |
Min. participants | 40 |
Max. participants | 70 |
Study board |
Study Board for BSc and MSc in Business, Language and Culture,
BSc
|
Course coordinator | |
|
|
Main academic disciplines | |
|
|
Teaching methods | |
|
|
Last updated on 02-02-2023 |
Relevant links |
Learning objectives | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Examination | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Course content, structure and pedagogical approach | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Scandinavian Sustainability In this course, we consider the current state of sustainability and CSR in Scandinavia and explore factors that could be considered as having contributed to Scandinavia’s historically strong sustainability and CSR performances.
Stakeholder Engagement Scandinavia is described by some commentators as a world leader in the areas of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and sustainability. Notably, these include deep-routed traditions of stakeholder engagement across Scandinavia, in line with the recent concept of “creating shared value”.
The Crucial Role of Government Another distinct feature is the active role of government that has encouraged strong CSR and sustainability performances of Scandinavian companies.
Scandinavian Governance and Finance in a Global Perspective Finally, many of the sustainable governance and finance solutions underpinning Scandinavian societies operate as hybrid public-private constellations. We compare and evaluate Scandinavian and other approaches to sustainability and CSR. We also reflect upon the challenges for Scandinavia to maintain its standing as a world leader and discuss how and why governments in Scandinavia engage in shaping CSR in business organizations. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description of the teaching methods | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
During lectures, we will go through the literature and case studies. We will have in-class small group assignments with student presentations. We will have guest lecturers to share their experience from the public, private and civil sector. We will use interactive tools for students to pose questions, vote and prioritise input. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Feedback during the teaching period | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Feedback will be given to students after class
exercises and, individually, in office hours. We will also run
through assignment guidelines and evaluation criteria towards the
end of the course, during which students are also invited to make
questions specifically on the exam assignment.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Student workload | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected literature | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Noring, L., Ohler, L., & Struthers, D. (2020). City government capacity and patterns in urban development project governance. Urban Affairs Review, SAGE, p. 1-29.
D. Matten & J. Moon (2020). Reflections on the 2018 Decade Award: The Meaning and Dynamics of Corporate Social Responsiblity. Academy of Management Review, 45(1), 7-28.
Noring, L. (2019). Public asset corporation: A new vehicle for urban regeneration and infrastructure finance. Cities, 88, 125-135.
Rasche, A., Morsing, M. & Moon, J. (2017). The Changing Role of Business in the Global Society: CSR and Beyond. In A Rasche et al. (2017). Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategy, Communication and Governance. Cambridge University Press. Chapter 1.
Strand, R., Freeman, R. E., & Hockerts, K. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability in Scandinavia: An Overview. Journal of Business Ethics 127(1), 1–15.
Strand, R. & Freeman, R. E. (2015). The Scandinavian Cooperative Advantage: Theory and practice of stakeholder engagement in Scandinavia. Journal of Business Ethics127(1), 65 – 85. |