Learning objectives |
Students are expected to be able to
- Explain and understand the necessity of systematic, logical
research design and the value of triangulation in ethnographic
research.
- Explain and understand the theoretical, epistemological, and
ontological assumptions that are built into ethnographic and
anthropological research.
- Use systematic research design, logical research design and
triangulation in their own ethnographic research.
- Understand the different benefits and draw backs of
ethnographic interviewing, cognitive interviewing, systematic
observation, participant observation, statistical enumeration and
inference, and archival research.
- Conduct research using ethnographic interviewing, cognitive
interviewing, systematic observation, participant observation,
statistical enumeration and inference, and archival research.
- Understand and implement the ethical evaluation of
research.
- Analyze and identify themes with data generated from
ethnographic interviewing, cognitive interviewing, systematic
observation, participant observation, statistical enumeration and
inference, and archival research.
- Design and conduct independent ethnographic research.
- Use the findings of independently designed and conducted
independent research to create and present a concept to the
course’s external partner.
- Reflect on the successes and failures in their own work and
suggest ways to improve on failures and build on success in future
basic and applied research projects.
|
Prerequisites for registering for the exam
(activities during the teaching period) |
Number of compulsory
activities which must be approved (see section 13 of the Programme
Regulations): 1
Compulsory home
assignments
An individually completed, pass/fail packet of methods
assignments, turned in during the
term. The methods assignment shall consist of at least eight (8)
our of ten (10) methods
worksheets.
|
Examination |
Ethnographic
Methods and Concept Development:
|
Exam
ECTS |
15 |
Examination form |
Oral exam based on written product
In order to participate in the oral exam, the written product
must be handed in before the oral exam; by the set deadline. The
grade is based on an overall assessment of the written product and
the individual oral performance, see also the rules about
examination forms in the programme regulations. |
Individual or group exam |
Individual oral exam based on written group
product |
Number of people in the group |
4-5 |
Size of written product |
Max. 30 pages |
Assignment type |
Written assignment |
Release of assignment |
Subject chosen by students themselves, see
guidelines if any |
Duration |
Written product to be submitted on specified date and
time.
20 min. per student, including examiners' discussion of grade,
and informing plus explaining the grade |
Grading scale |
7-point grading scale |
Examiner(s) |
Internal examiner and second internal
examiner |
Exam period |
Winter and Winter |
Make-up exam/re-exam |
Same examination form as the ordinary exam
Written assignment and oral
examination individually or in groups of up to 5
students.
|
Description of the exam
procedure
A group completed paper (2,500 to 3,000 words
plus appendices), graded on the 7-point scale,
completed at the end of the course, with an accompanying
individual oral examination based on the group
paper, also graded on the 7-point
scale.
|
|
Course content, structure and pedagogical
approach |
There comes a time in every young philosopher’s life when they
are called to test their abstract notions about how and why the
world works in the crucible of everyday life and empirical reality.
This course is that time.
Ethnographic Methods and Concept Development will give
students the perspective and methods to scrutinize their
philosophical ideas and presumptions by doing empirical,
field-based research. Furthermore, this course will give students
an opportunity to apply the findings of their research and develop
a Concept meant to help an external partner to the course. Past
partners have included the Danish National Museum and Tivoli.
The course will proceed in two sections: the first half will be
a course in research methods, in which students will learn how to
develop research questions, evaluate the ethics of a research
project, develop appropriate methods and samples to answer a
question, the logic of research design and data analysis, as well
as how research can be applied. In the second half of the course
students will take up some practical problem on behalf of an
external partner for the course. In pursuit of solving this
problem, students will learn how to develop applied research and
how to create a concept that answers a practical problem. Then
students will spend six weeks conducting independent research on a
project of their own design. After concluding this independent
research, students will analyze their data, develop a concept, and
present that concept to the course’s external
partner.
|
Description of the teaching methods |
This course will be highly interactive and
assignment based. Students will have the opportunity to try out and
workshop everything they learn in the class. Much of course time
will be spent in this sort of applied learning. Given that,
attendance, diligent coursework, and participation are all
essential parts of learning in Ethnographic Methods and Concept
Development. |
Feedback during the teaching period |
Students will have the opportunity in class and
or in supervision to receive feedback on all elements of this
course. |
Student workload |
Course Readings, Assignments, Independent Research |
256 hours |
Lectures, Exercise classes, workshops |
76 hours |
Examination Hours |
80 hours |
|
Further Information |
The main discipline for this course is
Anthropology.
|
Expected literature |
- Alexander Osterwalder & Yves Pigneur: Business Model
Canvas, in: Business Model Generation, New Jersey, John Wiley &
Sons, 2010.
- Almossawi, Ali. 2014. An Illustrated Book of Bad
Arguments. The Experiment. OR Bluedorn,
Nathaniel and Hans Bluedorn. 2015. The Fallacy
Detective:Thirty-Eight Lessons on How to Recognize Bad
Reasoning. Christian Logic
- American Anthropological Association. 2012. “Principles of
Professional Responsibility.”
https://www.americananthro.org/LearnAndTeach/Content.aspx?ItemNumber=22869&navItemNumber=652.
Accessed 18 December 2020.
- Bernard, H. Russell, Gery W. Ryan, and Stephen P. Borgatti.
2009. “Green Cognition and Behavior: A Cultural Domain Analysis.”
In Networks, Resources and Economic Action: Ethnographic Case
Studies in Honor of Hartmut Lang. Pp. 189-215. Berlin:
Dietrich Reimer Verlag.
- Bernard, H. Russell. 2011. “14 Direct and Indirect Obsevation.”
In Research Methods in Anthropology. Pp. 306-336. New
York: Alta Mira.
- Bernard, H. Russell. 2011. “Sampling I: The Basics.” In
Research Methods in Anthropology. Pp. 113-129. New York:
Alta Mira.
- Bourgois, Philippe and Jeffrey Schonberg. 2009. “8 Everyday
Addicts”. In Righteous Dopefiend. Pp. 241-271. Berkeley:
University of California Press.
- Caro, Robert A. 2019. “The Secrets of Lyndon Johnson’s
Archives.” The New Yorker January 21.
- Christian Bason: ”Hvad er design” & ”Udforsk problemrummet”
i Form Fremtiden – Designledelse som innovationsværktøj,
Gyldendal 2016.
- Denzin, Norman. 1970. “Strategies of Multiple Triangulation.”
In The Research Act. Pp. 297-314. New Brunswick, NJ:
Aldine Transaction.
- Dressler, William W. 2015. “Section I: The 5 Things You Need to
Know About Statistics.” In The 5 Things You Need To Know About
Statistics. Pp. 31-95. London: Routledge.
- Esber, George S., Jr. 1987. “Designing Apache Homes with
Apaches.” Anthropological Praxis: Translating Knowledge into
Action. Robert M. Wulff and Shirley J. Fiske eds. Pp. 187-197.
Boulder: West View Press.
- Fetterman, David M. 1987. “A National Ethnographic Evaluation
of the Career Intern Program.” Anthropological Praxis:
Translating Knowledge into Action. Robert M. Wulff and Shirley
J. Fiske eds. Pp. 243-253. Boulder: West View Press.
- Geertz, Clifford. 1973. Excerpt from “Chapter 1: Thick
Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture” and
“Chapter 15: Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight.” In
The Interpretation of Cultures. Pp. 3-10 and Pp. 412-455.
New York: Perseus.
- Gershon, Ilana. 2019. “Porous social orders.” American
Ethnologist 46(4):404-416
- Graeber, David. 2018. “Chapter 2: What Sorts of Bullshit Jobs
Are There?”. In Bullshit Jobs: A Theory. Pp. 27-67. New
York: Simon & Schuster.
- Guest, Greg, Arwen Bunch, and Laura Johnson. 2006. “How Many
Interviews are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and
Variability.” Field Methods 18:59-82
- Handwerker, W. Penn and Danielle F. Wozniak. 1997. “Sampling
Strategies for the Collection of Cultural Data: An Extension of
Boas’s Answer to Galton’s Problem. Current Anthropology.
38(5):869-875.
- Hyland, Stanley, Bridget Ciaramitaro, Charles Williams, and
Rosalind Cottrell. 1987. “Redesigning Social Service Delivery
Policy: The Anthropologist as Mediator.” Anthropological
Praxis: Translating Knowledge into Action. Robert M. Wulff and
Shirley J. Fiske eds. Pp 109-118. Boulder: West View Press.
- Irani, Lilly. 2018. ““Design Thinking”: Defending Silicon
Valley at the Apex of Global Labor Hierarchies.” Catalyst:
feminism, theory, Technoscience 4(1):1-19.
- Ketelaar, Eric. 2001. “Tacit narratives: The meanings of
archives.” Archival Science 1:131-141
- Masbjerg, Christian and Mikkel Rasmussen. 2014. “5 The
Turnaround” and “6 Product Design.” The Moment of Clarity: Using
the Human Sciences to Solve your Toughest Business Problems. Pp.
107-135. Cambridge: Harvard Business Review.
- Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1894. “What is a sign?”
https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/us/peirce1.htm.
Accessed March 9, 2018
- Piff, Paul K., Daniel M. Stancato, Stéphen Côté, Rodolfo
Mendoza-Denton, and Dacher Keltner. 2017. “Higher social class
predicts increased unethical behavior.” PNAS
109(11):4086-4091.
- Preister, Kevin. 1987. “Issue-Centered Social Impact
Assessment.” Anthropological Praxis: Translating Knowledge into
Action. Robert M. Wulff and Shirley J. Fiske eds. Pp. 39-56.
Boulder: West View Press.
- Ryan, Gary W. and H. Russell Bernard. 2003. “Techniques to
Identify Themes.” Field Methods 15:85-109.
- Shange, Savannah. 2019. Progressive Dystopia: Abolition,
Antiblackness & Schooling in San Francisco. Durham: Duke
University Press.
- Shange, Savannah. 2019. Progressive Dystopia: Abolition,
Antiblackness & Schooling in San Francisco. Durham: Duke
University Press.
- Souleles, Daniel. 2017. “Don’t mix Paxil, Viagra, and Xanax:
What financiers’ jokes say about inequality.” Economic
Anthropology 4:107-119.
- Souleles, Daniel. n.d. “Laughter and Joking Literature
Review.”
- Spradley, James P. 1979. “2.1 Locating an Informant” and “2.2
Interviewing an Informant.” In The Ethnographic Interview.
Pp. 45-68 New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.
- Spradley, James P. 1980. “Step Two: Doing Participant
Observation.” Pp. 53-63. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press
- Sutherland, Tonia. 2020. “Disrupting Carceral Narratives: Race,
Rape, and the Archives.” Open Information Science
4:156-168.
- Tom Kelley: ”Introduction” & ”The Anthropologist”, in: The
10 Faces of Innovation. New York / et al., Doubleday, 2005.
- Trotter, Robert T. 1987. “A Case of Lead Poisoning from Folk
Remedies in Mexican American Communities.” Anthropological
Praxis: translating Knowledge into Action. Robert M. Wulff and
Shirley J. Fiske eds. Pp. 146-160. Boulder: West View Press.
- Turner, Allen C. 1987. “Activating Community Participation in a
Southern Paiute Reservation Development Program.”
Anthropological Praxis: Translating Knowledge into Action.
Robert M. Wulff and Shirley J. Fiske eds. Pp. 118-135. Boulder:
West View Press.
- Weller, Susan C. and A. Kimball Romney. 1988. “1 Introduction
to Structured Interviewing,” “2 Defining a Domain and Free
Listing,” “3 Pile Sorts I: Single Sorts.” In Systematic Data
Collection. Pp. 6-26 London: Sage
|