English   Danish

2023/2024  BA-BHAAA2405U  Introduction to Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence

English Title
Introduction to Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence

Course information

Language English
Course ECTS 2.5 ECTS
Type Elective
Level Bachelor
Duration Summer
Start time of the course Summer
Timetable Course schedule will be posted at calendar.cbs.dk
Min. participants 30
Max. participants 60
Study board
Study Board for BSc in Economics and Business Administration
Course coordinator
  • Karin Buhmann - Department of Management, Society and Communication (MSC)
Main academic disciplines
  • Corporate governance
  • CSR and sustainability
  • Business Law
Teaching methods
  • Face-to-face teaching
Last updated on 13-12-2023

Relevant links

Learning objectives
After following the course, students are expected to:
  • Be familiar with the normative, management and policy background to corporate sustainability due diligence
  • Explain key aspects of corporate sustainability due diligence as a management process and its direction to identification and management of risks
  • Explain differences between corporate sustainability due diligence and transactional (financial or legal liability) due diligence
  • Be able to analyze demands on corporate sustainability due diligence and reflect upon their application in various business contexts
  • Be able to reflect upon the managerial implications of corporate due diligence demands in regard to reporting, value chain management and sustainable finance
  • Be able to explain the implications for functional managerial tasks of the soft and hard law on corporate sustainability due diligence that has been covered in the course
Examination
Introduction to Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence:
Exam ECTS 2,5
Examination form Active participation

The completion of this course is based on active student participation in class. The course will be considered as passed if the students participation - based on an overall assessment - in the class activities fulfill the learning objectives of the course. The individual student’s participation is assessed by the teacher.
The student must participate in Peer review, Presentation(s)
Individual or group exam Individual exam
Grading scale Pass / Fail
Examiner(s) Assessed solely by the teacher
Exam period Summer
Make-up exam/re-exam Oral exam based on written product
The oral part of the re-take is online.
In order to participate in the oral exam, the written product must be handed in before the oral exam; by the set deadline. The grade is based on an overall assessment of the written product and the individual oral performance.
Size of written product: Max. 5 pages
Assignment type: Essay
Duration: 20 min. per student, including examiners' discussion of grade, and informing plus explaining the grade
Examiner(s): If it is an internal examination, there will be a second internal examiner at the re-exam. If it is an external examination, there will be an external examiner.
Description of activities
Peer review: - Peer grading: Students ask each other questions such as quizzes or in follow-up to presentations. Each student must contribute to AT LEAST ONE peer grading.

In addition, the student must participate in minimum 80 % of the scheduled teaching.
Presentation(s): - Individual or group presentations during the instruction (each student must participate in AT LEAST ONE individual or group presentation).
Course content, structure and pedagogical approach

This course aims to equip current or future managers from companies, including SMEs, to understand, work with, apply and comply with Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence (CSDD) demands in their own organisations and in relations to business relationships.

 

An important aspect of responsible business conduct, Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence is a common element across the current so-called EU ‘tsunami’ of sustainability legislation that is currently being rolled out (including non-financial corporate sustainability reporting, value chain management, sustainable finance and taxonomy, ESG, etc). Several individual countries, such as France, Germany, Norway, the United Kingdom and Australia, have also adopted their own laws requiring business organisations to undertake and/or report on corporate sustainability due diligence policies, practices and outcomes.

 

While most of these demands directly mainly apply to larger companies, they are expected to trickle on to the value chain, including SMEs, in Europe as well as in other countries. A basic awareness of corporate sustainability due diligence will therefore be an asset for many organizations, even if they are not subject to direct requirements. Moreover, many organisations of all sizes, around the world, apply corporate sustainability due diligence based on leading international soft-law guidance, in particular the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct, and the United Nations Global Compact.

 

Corporate sustainability due diligence is also referred to as risk-based due diligence. The risk focus is directed at risks caused by the organization to society. Importantly, this direction differs from that of ‘transactional’ due diligence, such as financial or legal liability due diligence that many companies are already familiar with. This significant difference in risk orientation, too, underscores the relevance for managers and organisations to attain awareness of the relatively new form of due diligence.

 

Corporate sustainability due diligence was originally conceived as a management process for companies to identify and manage their harmful impacts on society on an ongoing basis. The original objective was solely on developing and implementing effective management processes for that particular purpose, to assist the organization in understanding about and managing its harmful impacts or risks of such impacts, and ensure that affected people and communities were involved meaningfully in processed to identify risks and develop solutions. Transforming CSDD into legal requirements and quantifiable data (that may easily lead to a singular ‘compliance’ focus) without losing the overall and original focus on sustainable and responsible business conduct, will requires solid knowledge in business organisations. That applies whether organization is subject directly or indirectly to the requirements.

 

Paying attention to the original objectives and novel legal demands, this course introduces managers in SMEs and other organisations to corporate sustainability due diligence in terms of contents, context, demands and implementation.

Paying attention to the original objectives and novel legal demands, this course introduces managers in SMEs and other organisations to corporate sustainability due diligence in terms of contents, context, demands and implementation. We will also look at how corporate sustainability due diligence can support other business functions and be of value to general business practices; how it may support CSR, corporate sustainability and Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) objectives of the organization; and how it relates to a fair and just green transition.

 

The course applies a combination of teaching forms to support participants’ learning: lectures and guest lectures, cases, group discussions and presentations. We may also use role plays and documentary viewing. Blended learning may occur, mainly if ideal for guest lecturing or exercises. Guest lecturers with practical experience will provide insightful thoughts on their own experience and the value and challenges that corporate sustainability due diligence work can entail.

Description of the teaching methods
The course applies a combination of teaching forms to support participants’ learning: lectures and guest lectures, cases, group discussions and presentations. We may also use role plays and documentary viewing. Blended learning may occur, mainly if ideal for guest lecturing or exercises. Guest lecturers with practical experience will provide insightful thoughts on their own experience and the value and challenges that corporate sustainability due diligence work can entail.
Feedback during the teaching period
Feedback will be given through the instructor's comments and elaborative questions in plenary and group debates and discussions, presentations, etc. Feedback is also obtained from other students as part of the peer grading.
Student workload
Teaching 16 hours
Preparation 54 hours
Further Information

2-week course cannot be combined with any other course.

Expected literature

As corporate sustainability due diligence is a topic that is rapidly evolving due to increasing demands, the literature is also fast evolving. This tentative list is intended to represent types and topics. It will be updated with new literature before course start.  

 

Schilling-Vacaflor, A. and Lenschow, A. (2023), Hardening foreign corporate accountability through mandatory due diligence in the European Union? New trends and persisting challenges. Regulation & Governance, 17: 677-693. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1111/​rego.12402

 

Bright, Claire, and Buhmann, K (2021) Risk-based due diligence, climate change, human rights and the justtransition. Sustainability 13(18), DOI https:/​/​doi.org/​10.3390/​su131810454

 

Ooms, M. (2022). Risk-based due diligence reporting in global mineral supply chains and the rule through transparency. The Theory and practice of legislation. 10(1), 48–66. https:/​/​search.informit.org/​doi/​10.3316/​agispt.20220326064328


Buhmann, K., Jonas Jonsson & Mette Fisker (2019) Do no harm and do more good too: Connecting Business & and Human Rights theory with Political CSR to help companies identify opportunities for contributing to the SDGs. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 19(3) 389-403 https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1108/​CG-01-2018-0030

 

Excerpts from the OECD’s Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises for Responsible Business Conduct, OECD 2023 (available at: https:/​/​www.oecd.org/​publications/​oecd-guidelines-for-multinational-enterprises-on-responsible-business-conduct-81f92357-en.htm), Chapter II (General Principles)

 

McCorquedale, Robert, Lise Smith, Stuart Neely and Robin Brooks (2017) Human Rights due diligence in law and practice: Good practices and challenges for business enterprises, Business and Human Rights Journal, 195-224, doi:10.1017/bhj.2017.2

 

Excerpts from the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (2022)

 

Buhmann, Karin (2023)  Confronting challenges to substantive remedy for victims: Opportunities for   OECD NCPs under a due diligence regime involving civil liability. Business and Human Rights Journal (Cambridge Journals), online: doi:10.1017/bhj.2023.9

 

Excerpts from the OECD (2018). Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Business Conduct. Paris: OECD

 

Buhmann, Karin (2023)  Addressing a human rights paradox in the green transition: Guidance for  invested mining operations to benefit local communities. Journal of Cleaner Production,  online: https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.jclepro.2023.137903

 

Johanna Elbel, Stephan Bose O'Reilly, Rok Hrzic (2023) A European Union corporate due diligence act for whom? Considerations about the impact of a European Union due diligence act on artisanal and small-scale cobalt miners in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Resources Policy,

https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.resourpol.2022.103241.

 

Milanez, B. (2021) Climate crisis, critical minerals extraction and their effects in Brazil. POEMAS/Dialogos dos povos. Doi.org/​10.6084/​m9.figshare.16903480

 

Buhmann, K. (2020) Meaningful stakeholder engagement as an aspect of risk-based due diligence between the economy, politics and law: the constitutive role of the Business & Human Rights regime. In Johnstone, Rachael L. and Anne Merrild (eds) Regulation of Extractive Industries: Community Engagement in the Arctic (Routledge): 78-98

 

Excerpts from the OECD (2017b). Responsible business conduct for institutional investors: Key considerations for due diligence under the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. Paris: OECD

 

Excerpts from the OECD (2017c). Due Diligence guidance for meaningful stakeholder engagement in the extractive sector. Paris: OECD.

 

Excerpts from the OECD (2016). Due diligence guidance for responsible supply chains of minerals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas. Third edition. Paris: OECD.

 

Buhmann, K. (2018) Neglecting the proactive aspect of human rights due diligence? A critical appraisal of the EU’s Non-Financial Reporting Directive as a Pillar One avenue for promoting Pillar Two action. Business and Human Rights Journal 3(1) 23-45, doi:  10.1017/​bhj.2017.24

 

Buhmann, K. (2018) Analyzing OECD National Contact Point statements for guidance on human rights due diligence: method, findings and outlook, Nordic Journal of Human Rights 36(4) 390-410

 

Mancini, L., Eslava, N.A., Traverso, M., Mathieux, F. (2021) Assessing impacts of responsible sourcing initiatives for cobalt: Insights from a case study, Resources Policy, 71, https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.resourpol.2021.102015 .

 

Buhmann, K. (2017)  Business and Human Rights: Connecting the managerial and legal aspects. In Patricia Flynn, Tay Keong Tan, Milenko Gudic, eds) Beyond the Bottom Line: Integrating the UN Compact into Management Education , PRME/Greenleaf: 97-108  [to be made available on Canvas]

 

Buhmann, K. (2017) Connecting Corporate Human Rights Responsibilities and State Obligations   Under the UN Guiding Principles: Communication and Human Rights Due Diligence, in Rendtorff, Jacob Dahl (ed) Perspectives onPhilosophy of Management and Business Ethics (Springer): 281-295 [to be made available on Canvas]

Last updated on 13-12-2023