2023/2024 KAN-CCMVV2308U Decision Making for Strategy Execution
English Title | |
Decision Making for Strategy Execution |
Course information |
|
Language | English |
Course ECTS | 7.5 ECTS |
Type | Elective |
Level | Full Degree Master |
Duration | One Semester |
Start time of the course | Autumn |
Timetable | Course schedule will be posted at calendar.cbs.dk |
Max. participants | 80 |
Study board |
Study Board for cand.merc. and GMA (CM)
|
Course coordinator | |
|
|
Main academic disciplines | |
|
|
Teaching methods | |
|
|
Last updated on 16-02-2023 |
Relevant links |
Learning objectives | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
At the end of this course students should be able
to:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Examination | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Course content, structure and pedagogical approach | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
In the current competitive business environment, managers need
to be prepared to make decisions quickly and decisively while
implementing strategies. Making strategic decisions involves many
considerations such as weighing risk, understanding the specific
situation encountered, identifying available strategic options as
well as considering long-range implications for the organization.
Most managers report that making decisions is a significant
challenge in their work life. Understanding the nature of this
challenge may be a first step in the direction of improving one’s
capacity for making wiser decisions.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description of the teaching methods | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
We use movies and documentaries that are based on
true stories of strategy execution where complex decision making
under uncertainty and ambiguity occur.
The course has 11 weekly sessions where each session consists of primarily in class activities supplemented by on-line activities. - Lectures and discussion of theory & cases (2 hour) - On-line exercises and activities e.g. case analysis (approximately 1 hour) Student participation will be targeted at producing insights that are meant to be covered in the final exam assignment. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Feedback during the teaching period | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The case discussions are structured around
in-class group work analyses and subsequent discussion. The
students will get collective feedback by the teacher.
Students can get individual feedback to questions during office hours. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Student workload | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected literature | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Constantiou, I., Shollo, A., & Vendelø, M. T. (2019). Mobilizing intuitive judgement during organizational decision making: When business intelligence is not the only thing that matters. Decision Support Systems, 121, 51-61.
March, J. G. (1994). Primer on decision making: How decisions happen. Simon and Schuster publication.
Salas, E., M. A. Rosen, and D. DiazGranados. "Expertise-based intuition and decision making in organizations." Journal of Management(2009):941-973
Shollo, A., Constantiou, I., & Kreiner, K. (2015). The interplay between evidence and judgment in the IT project prioritization process. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 24(3), 171-188.
Shollo, A., and I. Constantiou. "Self-Reinforcing Mechanisms and Organizational Decision Making: The Case of Project Prioritization in a Financial Institution." Self-Reinforcing Processes in and Among Organizations(2013): 104-124
Shollo, A., Hopf, K., Thiess, T., & Müller, O. (2022). Shifting ML value creation mechanisms: A process model of ML value creation. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 31(3), 101734.
Shrestha, Y. R., Ben-Menahem, S. M., & von Krogh, G. (2019). Organizational Decision-Making Structures in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. California Management Review.
Tingling, P. M., & Brydon, M. J. (2010). Is decision-based evidence making necessarily bad?MIT Sloan Management Review, 51(4), 71-76.
Yeung, K. (2019). Why Worry about Decision-Making by Machine?. In Algorithmic Regulation. Oxford University Press. |