It has been argued that with the increasing level of volatility,
“the days of static supply chain strategies are over” (Simchi-Levi
& Fine, 2010) and that we need to manage “supply chains in the
era of turbulence” (Christopher & Holweg, 2011). Indeed, the
2008 financial crisis, the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake, the 2013 Rana
Plaza accident, the 2013 horsemeat scandal and the Covid-19
pandemic have demonstrated that organizations are exposed to risks
outside their own boundaries. The Covid-19 pandemic is hitting the
global supply chain particularly hard with observed ripple effects
across a number of network elements. The magnitude and scope of
these correlated disruptions have drawn global attention and
brought long-term consequences. Thus, traditional supply chain
management needs to be expanded by integrating the notion of risk,
and traditional risk management needs to be expanded by taking a
supply chain view. This leads to supply chain risk management
(SCRM), i.e., “the implementation of strategies to manage both
every day and exceptional risks along the supply chain based on
continuous risk assessment with the objective of reducing
vulnerability and ensuring continuity” (Wieland & Wallenburg,
2012).
Building on knowledge from other courses on operations and
supply chain management (namely “Operations & Logistics
Management” and “Logistics Clusters”), this course covers 1) The
relevant processes of SCRM; 2) Phenomena related to supply chain
risk from different theoretical perspectives and the relevant
management approaches; 3) Quantification methods of supply chain
risk management; 4) Risk issues related to sustainability and
resilience. Based on interactive discussions and case studies, the
participants will learn how to apply such knowledge in a managerial
context.
|
The following is a tentative list of readings. The final reading
list can be found in Canvas two weeks before the course starts.
Mandatory Literature
- Baz, J., and Ruel, S. 2021. Can Supply Chain Risk Management
Practice Mitigate the Disrutpion Impacts on Supply Chains’
resilience and robustness? Evidence from an empirical survey in a
Covid-19 outbreak era. International Journal of Production
Economics, 233, pp. 107972.
- Ivanov,D. and Dolgui, A. 2021. OR-methods for coping with the
ripple effect in supply chains during COVID-19 pandemic: Managerial
insights and research implications. International Journal of
Production Economics, 232, pp.107921.
- Christopher, M., Holweg, M. 2011. “Supply Chain 2.0”: Managing
Supply Chains in the Era of Turbulence. International Journal of
Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41 (1),
63–82.
- Fisher, M.L. 1997. What is the Right Supply Chain for your
Product? Harvard Business Review, 75 (2), 105–116.
- Lee, H.L., Padmanabhan, V., Whang, S. 1997. Information
Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect. Management
Science, 43 (4), 546–558.
- Mentzer, J.T., DeWitt, W., Keebler, J.S., Min, S., Nix, N.W.,
Smith, C.D., Zacharia, Z.G., 2001. Defining Supply Chain
Management. Journal of Business Logistics, 22 (2), 1–25.
- Montabon, F., Pagell, M. and Wu, Z. (2016), Making
Sustainability Sustainable. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 52,
11-27.
Additional Literature
- Chopra, S. & Sodhi, M.S. (2014): Reducing the Risk of
Supply Chain Disruptions. MIT Sloan Management Review, spring
2014.
- Lee, H.L., Padmanabhan, V. & Whang, S. (2004): Information
Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect. Management
Science, Vol. 50, No. 12, pp. 1875–1886.
- Simchi-Levi, D., Schmidt, W. & Wei, Y. (2014): From
Superstorms to Factory Fires: Managing Unpredictable Supply-Chain
Disruptions. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 92, No. 1/2, pp.
96–101.
- Wieland, A. & Wallenburg, C.M. (2012): Dealing with Supply
Chain Risks: Linking Risk Management Practices and Strategies to
Performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution &
Logistics Management, Vol. 42, No. 10, pp. 887–905.
- Wieland, A. & Wallenburg, C.M. (2013): The Influence of
Relational Competencies on Supply Chain Resilience: A Relational
View. International Journal of Physical Distribution &
Logistics Management, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp.
300–320.
|
|