2024/2025 BA-BPOLO1283U Research Design and Qualitative Methods
English Title | |
Research Design and Qualitative Methods |
Course information |
|
Language | English |
Course ECTS | 7.5 ECTS |
Type | Mandatory |
Level | Bachelor |
Duration | One Semester |
Start time of the course | Spring |
Timetable | Course schedule will be posted at calendar.cbs.dk |
Study board |
Study Board for BSc/MSc i International Business and Politics,
BSc
|
Course coordinator | |
|
|
Main academic disciplines | |
|
|
Teaching methods | |
|
|
Last updated on 25-06-2024 |
Relevant links |
Learning objectives | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Examination | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Course content, structure and pedagogical approach | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The objective of this course is to provide students with an understanding of how to formulate, conduct, analyze and report qualitative research in the social sciences. The course further discusses how to assess the quality of research and how to approach ethical questions concerning qualitative research.
There are three main components to the course:
1. Philoshophy of science section introduces the students to the most essential key concepts and positions in philosophy of science and strengthens their epistemological and ontological awareness.
2. Research design section helps the students understand the link between research questions, theoretical direction and empirical material, by focusing on cross-sectional, temporal, single and multiple case study designs.
3. Data collection and analysis section develops key skills in the collection and analysis of qualitative data by covering diverse techniques, such as qualitative interviewing, focus groups, text/document analysis and observation.
The course uses blended learning in order to maximize opportunities for both flexible learning and classroom interaction. Whereas the online elements of the course are directed towards content, much of the interactive elements incorporate the direct classroom application of skills, especially with regard to qualitative data collection and analysis. In line with the Nordic Nine principles, the course seeks to substantially develop learners' curiosity and analytic skills when working with different forms of qualitative data.
Nordic Nine 2: "You are analytical with data and curious about ambiguity". Given the requirements from the Ministry on basic philosophy of science content there will also need to an objective that student comprehend the basic concepts, terms, and positions around issues of ontology and epistemology. Given the emphasis on research design the students would be required to produce a research design that is able to link a research question to qualitative methods and empirical data.
In relation to Nordic Nine
Research design and qualitative methods seeks to develop CBS students’ transformative capabilities by addressing in particular the following Nordic Nine principles: Learners are encouraged to consider on societal challenges in a broad and expansive context by creating and co-creating deep knowledge about micro-level issues that are relevant to modern, international business practices (NN1). During this process, they develop skills in collecting and analyzing primary data by reflecting upon quality, credibility, authenticity of different types of data and data sources. They are encouraged to be curious about working independently and embracing the complexity and ambiguity of real world challenges and data (NN2). Critical reflection is a key component of the course, as the learners make sense of the ethical dilemmas encountered in various research settings and develop the necessary leadership values to navigate and overcome them. They practice leadership skills as a part of their group work and collaboratively reflect on issues that are relevant for future business leaders, including their own epistemological and ontological positions and assumptions that guide their decisions (NN5, NN6). In RD&QM, participants engage in continuous learning by reassessing their own set of operational assumptions and reflecting on how they matter in practice. By teaching each other about their specific projects, learners help each other to grow by gaining a deeper level of reflexivity. Collectively, they collaborate on relearning as a stepping-stone to broader knowledge creation (NN8). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description of the teaching methods | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The course is based on several components:
• Pre-recorded lectures that introduce the basic content and core concepts • Interactive lectures that allow for plenary discussion • Exercise classes that focus on application of research design techniques and qualitative research methods • Supervised group work that involves designing qualitative research and collecting and analyzing data in a mini-research project • A workshop, in which students present the results of their projects and receive thorough feedback The course requires active participation, this means in particular that we expect students to do the readings before the lectures, attend and actively participate in the lectures and show a high degree of willingness to engage in empirical group work. The course is structured so that lectures and exercises do not overlap with the supervised group project. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Feedback during the teaching period | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The course seeks to secure continuous feedback in
the following ways:
Feedback on design, data collection and analysis: This type of feedback is first given during the exercise classes. In each exercise class, the instructor hands out a task which involves the direct in-class application of a particular method that has been taught during the preceding lectures, such as interviewing, content and discourse analysis and observation. The students use the Canvas platform to upload and get instant feedback on their work from exercise class teachers and peers. Supervision of mini-research projects: Two rounds of group supervision is offered before the written report for the final exam is due. During both rounds, supervisors provide oral feedback on research topic/question, research design, methods of data collection and analytical strategies in dialogue form. Workshop: Each research team participates in a workshop where they upload and make a short presentation of their research and receive extensive feedback from their lecturers/supervisors and peers. The structure of the workshops simulates a ‘research seminar’ with established time slots, where each group acts as a presenter and discussant and the supervisors offer their final comments with room for a plenary discussion at the end. Oral component of the final exam: At the end of the oral exam, the students are given an individual grade as well as the individual reasoning for that grade. This type of feedback includes information on where their research succeeded the most and where there is room for improvement. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Student workload | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected literature | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There is one main text book that will be used during the course:
The textbook is supplemented by other mandatory and further reading material. A comprehensive reading list can be found in the course plan that will be published on CANVAS at the start of the semester. |