2024/2025 KAN-CSCAO1003U Performance Management in Operations
English Title | |
Performance Management in Operations |
Course information |
|
Language | English |
Course ECTS | 7.5 ECTS |
Type | Mandatory |
Level | Full Degree Master |
Duration | One Semester |
Start time of the course | Autumn |
Timetable | Course schedule will be posted at calendar.cbs.dk |
Study board |
Study Board for cand.merc. and SCM
|
Course coordinator | |
|
|
Main academic disciplines | |
|
|
Teaching methods | |
|
|
Last updated on 17-05-2024 |
Relevant links |
Learning objectives | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The aim of this course is to enable students to
provide an in-depth study of a problem of practical and scientific
relevance to the area of performance management in operations and
supply networks. Students must show this ability through a
theoretical review, analysis, and reflection. Specifically, the
learning objectives are demonstrated in the exam to the degree to
which students can:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Examination | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Course content, structure and pedagogical approach | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance management is concerned with how managers inside the focal firm and in the wider supply network may apply different measurement practices and management accounting technologies to make strategic oriented design decisions and to control their supply networks.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description of the teaching methods | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This course relies on a diversity of teaching methods including case-based and literature-based discussions, student presentations, and traditional lecturing where appropriate. Active student participation, including presentations, is required. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Feedback during the teaching period | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Students can get feedback via various sources:
- personal discussion, e.g. in office hours - short case assignments and exercises - student presentations |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Student workload | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected literature | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Course literature is based on a combination of scientific and managerial articles, book-chapters, and case studies. See below for some examples:
Anthony, R.N. and Govindarajan, V. (2007), “Performance Measurement (Chapter 11)” in Management Control Systems, Twelfth Edition.
Figge, F. and Hahn, T. (2012), “Is green and profitable sustainable? Assessing the trade-off between economic and environmental aspects”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol.140 No.1, pp. 92-102.
Giannakis, M., & Papadopoulos, T. (2016), “Supply chain sustainability: A risk management approach”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 171, pp. 455-70.
Hald, K. & Ellegaard (2011) “Supplier evaluation processes: the shaping and reshaping of supplier performance”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management. Vol. 31, No.8, pp. 888-910.
Hald, K.S. and Mouritsen, J. (2018), “The evolution of performance measurement systems in a supply chain: A longitudinal case study on the role of interorganisational factors”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 205, pp. 256-271.
Hanson, J.D., Melnyk, S.A., and Calantone, R.A. (2011) "Defining and measuring alignment in performance management", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 31 Issue:10, pp.1089-1114.
Kulp, S. L., Narayanan, V. G., & Verkleeren, R. L. (2004). Metalcraft supplier scorecard. Harvard Business School.
Melnyk, S.A., Davis, E.W., Spekman, R.E. and Sandor, J. (2010), “Outcome driven supply chains”, MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 51 No. 2, pp. 33-38.
Stevenson, M. and Spring, M. (2007) "Flexibility from a supply chain perspective: definition and review", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 27 No. 7, pp. 685-713.
Tummala, R. and Schoenherr, T. (2011), “Assessing and managing risks using the Supply Chain Risk Management Process (SCRMP)”, Supply Chain Management, Vol. 16 No.6, pp. 474-83. |