2010/2011 KAN-CM_T78 Sustainable Management Accounting and Finance
English Title | |
Sustainable Management Accounting and Finance |
Course Information | |
Language | English |
Point | 7,5 ECTS (225 SAT) |
Type | Elective |
Level | Full Degree Master |
Duration | One Quarter |
Course Period |
Autumn
.
First Quarter
.
Spring
Pending schedule: Week 35: Monday, 13.30-14.15 Week 36-42: Monday, 13.30-17.00 This course will also be offered in Spring 2012 |
Time Table | Please see course schedule at e-Campus |
Study Board |
Study Board for MSc in Economics and Business Administration |
Course Coordinator | |
Cristiana Parisi - cp.om@cbs.dkSecretary Mette Kierkegaard - mki.om@cbs.dk | |
Main Category of the Course | |
| |
Taught under Open University-Taught under open university. | |
Last updated on 29 maj 2012 |
Learning Objectives | |||||
This course aims at providing students with an appreciation of the broader context of corporate performance and disclosure in the context of sustainability and social justice. After having attended the course, students are expected to have both a sound theoretical understanding and a practical grasp of sustainability and corporate social responsibility. This implies that students should
| |||||
Prerequisite | |||||
Basic knowledge of management accounting, strategic performance measurement and finance are advantageous. | |||||
Examination | |||||
4-hour individual written exam (open book) | |||||
| |||||
Examination | |||||
4-hour individual written exam (open book), graded on the Danish 7-point scale. Students are allowed to bring notes and all the course material, but cannot use mobile phones or have internet access during the exam. | |||||
Prerequisites for Attending the Exam | |||||
Course Content | |||||
We live in a world of great challenges and high expectations in relation to the social and environmental footprint. Conscious attention to sustainable development in the economic, environmental and social domains benefit both the organization and its stakeholders. The advantages for the organization may include improved risk management, insight into new market opportunities, better access to capital markets, eco-efficiency and an improved reputation which will enhance trust of consumers and employees. The focus of this course is on the role of entities (governments, non government organizations, firms and individuals) and their accountability, accounting and reporting issues in the context of sustainable development. Corporate social and environmental accountability, accounting and reporting is concerned with measuring, managing and communicating the social and environmental effects of a corporation's economic actions to particular stakeholders and to society at large. Main Themes:
The course´s development of personal competences: This course aims to provide students with the skills and knowledge to perform high quality internal and external assurance on sustainability. It, therefore, has the following deliverables:
| |||||
Teaching Methods | |||||
The teaching of this course will be based on a variety of methods. There will be formal lectures, group discussions, case studies and debates. Moreover, experts will be invited to contribute with their personal experience on the field. | |||||
Further Information | |||||
Suggested readings Federation des Experts Comptables Europeens (FEE): 2006, Key Issues in Sustainability Assurance. An Overview. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI): 2006, Sustainability Reporting Guidelines. Version 3.0. Institut der Wirtschaftsprüfer in Deutschland (IDW): 2005, Germany Generally Accepted Assurance Principles for Audit or Review of Sustainability Reports (ED As). Institute of Social and Ethical Accountability (ISEA): 1999, ‘AA1000 Framework’, Institute of Social and Ethical Engagement, UK. Institute of Social and Ethical Accountability (ISEA): 2003, ‘AA1000 Assurance Standard’, London. International Auditing and Assurance Standard Board (IAASB): 2004, ‘International Standard on Assurance Engagement 3000. Assurance Engagement Other than Audits or Reviews of Historical Information’, International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, New York, NY. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB): 2006, Assurance Aspects of G3 – The Global Reporting Initiative’s 2006 Draft Sustainability Reporting Guidelines. International Federation of Accountants (IFAC): 2002, ‘The Determination and Communication of Levels of Assurance Other than High’, New York. Koninklijk Nederlands Instituut van Registeraccountants (NIVRA): 2005, The Netherlands: Practitioners Working with Subject Matter Experts from other Disciplines on Non-Financial Assurance Engagements (ED 3010) and Assurance Engagements Relating to Sustainability Reports (ED 3410). KPMG-Amsterdam Graduate Business School: 2005, KPMG International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting (University of Amsterdam Publisher). Standards Australia, Standard AS/NZS 5911 (Int): 2005, General Guidelines on the Verification, Validation and Assurance of Environmental and Sustainability Reports. | |||||
Literature | |||||
Adams, C.A. and McNicholas, P. (2007), “Making a difference Sustainability reporting, accountability and organisationalchange”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 382-402. Anthony, R.N. and Govindarajan, V. (2006), Management Control Systems, New York, Irwin McGraw-Hill, pp. 459-475. Blowfield, M. and Murray, A. (2008), “Chapter 1 & 5: Introducing corporate responsibility. The business case for corporate responsibility”. Corporate responsibility – a critical introduction. Oxford: oxford University Press. Clapp, J. (2005), “Global Environmental Governance for Corporate Responsibility and the Shaping of Global public Policy” Global Environmental Politics 5(3). Crane, A., Matten, D. and Spence, L. (2008) Chapter 10 “CSR Strategy and implementation” in Corporate Social Responsibility: Readings and cases in a global context. Oxon: Routledge. (38 p.). Dey, C. (2007), “Developing silent and shadow accounting” in Unerman, J., Babbington, J. And O'Dwyer, B., Sustainability Accounting and Accountability, New York, Routledge, pp. 307-326. Figge, F. et. al. (2002) “The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard. Linking sustainability management to business strategy” Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 11, No. 5, pp.269-284. Gjølberg, M. (2010), “Measuring the Immeasurable? Constructing and Index of CSR Practices and CSR Performance in 20 Countries”. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(1): 10-22. Hart, S. L. and Milstein, M. B. (2003), “Creating Sustainable Value,” Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 56-67. Kaplan R.S. and Norton D.P. (2004), Strategy Maps, Boston, Harvard Business School Press, pp. 163-195. Lafferty, W. and O. Langhelle (1999), “Sustainable Development as concept and Norm”. towards Sustainable development: ON Goals of Development and the conditions for Sustainability. W. Lafferty and O. Langhelle, MacMillan Press Ltd. Lingane, A. and Olsen, S. (2004), “Guidelines for Social Return on Investment”, California management review, Vol. 46, N. 3, pp. 135-66. Matten, D. and Moon, J. (2008), “Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility” Academy of Management Review 33(2): 404-424. McKeiver, C. and Gadenne, D. (2005), “Environmental Management Systems in Small and Medium Businesses”, International Small Business Journal, Vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 513–537. O'Dweyer, B. and Owen, D.L. (2005), “Assurance statement practice in environmental, social and sustainability reporting: A critical evaluation” British Accounting Review, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 205-29. Pinkese, J. and Kolk, A. (2007), “Multinational corporations and Emissions Trading: Strategic Responses to New Institutional Constraints”, European Management Journal, Vol. 25, No. 6, pp. 441–452. Porter, B., Simon, J. and Hatherly, D. (2008) Principles of External Auditing, John Wiley and Sons, pp. 723-761. UNEP, (2007). Life Cycle Management. A Business Guide to Sustainability, pp. 10-21. Vogel, D. (2005), “Chapters 1 & 2 The Market for Virtue: the Corporate Connection. The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility” Washington, Brookings. Weishaar, S. (2007) “CO2 emission allowance allocation mechanisms, allocative efficiency and the environment: a static and dynamic perspective”, European Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 24, pp.29–70. Cases Dharba K. (2005), The threat of global warming: a business opportunity, ICFAI Centre for Management Research ICMR, pp.1-12. Ewart T. (2005), Mearl oil Company: Environmental Impact Targets(A-C), Richard Ivey School of Business, pp. 1-30. Indu P. and Gupta, V. (2008), Tesco’s Steering Wheel. A tool for strategic value creation and business transformation, ICFAI Centre for Management Research ICMR, pp. 1-21. Leonard, H.B., Epstein, M. and Wing, L. (2005), Playgrounds and Performance: Results management at KaBOOM! (A-C), Harvard Business School Cases pp. 1-23. Moss Kanter, R. and Reisende Pinho, R. (2007), Banco Real, Banking on Sustainability, Harvard Business School cases, pp. 1-24. Rajiv, F. (2007), BP Putting profits before safety?, ICFAI Centre for Management Research ICMR, pp.1-19. Regani, S. (2007), ‘Ecomangination’ at work. GE’s sustainability initiative, ICFAI Centre for Management Research ICMR, pp. 1-18. Reinhard F. (2001), Sustainable development and socially responsible investing: ABB in 2000, Harvard Business School cases, pp. 1-37. Saigeetha C. (2008), Corporate Responsibility: Are the Corporate alone responsible?, ICFAI Centre for Management Research ICMR, pp. 1-16. Sridevi, C. (2003), Balanced Scorecard: A performance Support System, ICFAI Centre for Management Research ICMR, pp. 1-3. (pages: 493 from A and B Journals,Textbooks and Cases) |