2012/2013 BA-PPSM Philosophy of Social Science and Applied Qualitative Methods
English Title | |
Philosophy of Social Science and Applied Qualitative Methods |
Course information |
|
Language | English |
Exam ECTS | 10 ECTS |
Type | Mandatory |
Level | Bachelor |
Duration | One Semester |
Course period | Spring |
Time Table | Please see course schedule at e-Campus |
Study board |
Study Board for BSc/MSc i International Business and Politics, BSc
|
Course coordinator | |
|
|
Main Category of the Course | |
|
|
Last updated on 06-05-2013 |
Learning objectives | |||||||||||||||
The overall purpose is to develop students’ skills in making informed and reasoned methodological and theoretical choices in their own analytical work. At the end of the course students are expected to be able to:
|
|||||||||||||||
Examination | |||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Examination | |||||||||||||||
Written group project followed by group oral exam according to the rules in § 6 in the Programme Regulations. Students are graded by teacher and external examiner on the 7-point scale. Grading is based on an overall evaluation of the written and oral performance. Groups consist of up to five students. At the oral exam, 20 minutes are allotted per student. The exam evaluates both philosophy of science and qualitative methods, as well as the students’ ability to use insights in the project from other disciplines from the programme. The project must draw on theory and empirical material. Maximum project length: 5 students: 60 standard pages 4 students: 50 standard pages 3 students: 45 standard pages 2 students: 40 standard pages 1 student: 30 standard pages Re-exam when the oral ordinary exam is failed is an individual oral exam (20 minutes per student) based upon the same group project with a 3-standard page supplement. Make-up exam when ill at the ordinary exam is an individual oral exam (20 minutes per student) based on the same group project. Make-up exam when ill during the writing of the project is a 20 minutes oral exam with 20 minutes preparation in the entire curriculum. No aids are allowed. |
|||||||||||||||
Course content | |||||||||||||||
The overall purpose is to develop students’ skills in making sound, informed, and reasoned methodological and theoretical choices in their own analytical work. In order to achieve this, the course aims firstly at giving the students and introduction to the history of economic and political thought. Secondly, it aims at giving the students and understanding of major positions and debates in the philosophy of science, such as positivism, constructivism, hermeneutics, and critical realism. Thirdly, the course introduces qualitative methods used in contemporary political economy and business studies such as macro-sociological method, comparative methods, interview techniques and report writing techniques. The course covers i) key positions in the philosophy of science, focusing on the social sciences, ii) qualitative methods used in contemporary political economy and business studies, and iii) writing a project. Students choose their own project theme and develop their own research question. The project must be action or policy oriented, on behalf of a company or other type of organization, it must draw on both management and social science disciplines from the programme, and it must draw on theory as well as on empirical material. The course involves writing a project. Students choose their own project theme and develop their own research question. The project must be action oriented, on behalf of a company or other type of organization, it must draw on both management and social science disciplines from the programme, and it must draw on theory as well as on empirical material. The specific action orientation of the project must be addressed in the problem statement and in the conclusion. The purpose of this requirement is to avoid purely academic and theoretical projects with no practical relevance at all. It is a flexible requirement that can be met in different ways. As a minimum it means that the project must address the questions: 1. Which actor or group of actors is the knowledge produced in this project relevant for? 2. How is it relevant for this actor or group of actors? In other words, how can it contribute to choice of action, strategy formulation, improvement of practice etc? Depending on the nature of the project, it can be taken further, for instance into
|
|||||||||||||||
Teaching methods | |||||||||||||||
Lectures |
Last updated on 06-05-2013