2014/2015 KAN-CCBLU3000U Business, Government, and Society
English Title | |
Business, Government, and Society |
Course information |
|
Language | English |
Course ECTS | 7.5 ECTS |
Type | Elective |
Level | Full Degree Master |
Duration | One Quarter |
Course period | Third Quarter |
Timetable | Course schedule will be posted at calendar.cbs.dk |
Min. participants | 40 |
Max. participants | 50 |
Study board |
Study Board for BSc og MSc in Business, Language and Culture,
MSc
|
Course coordinator | |
|
|
Course Administrator: Tove Pedersen, tpe.stu@cbs.dk | |
Main academic disciplines | |
|
|
Last updated on 25-02-2014 |
Learning objectives | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The overall aim of this course is to gain an
in-depth understanding of the different factors influencing the
legal, ethical, and economic responsibilities of firms,
particu-larly when considering the changing relationship between
businesses, governments and civil society actors. After completing
this course students should be able to:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Examination | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Course content and structure | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
This course approaches corporations’ changing
responsibilities in society from the perspective of how business,
government, and civil society interact. The course introduces
students to debates on CSR and sustainability, but also reaches
beyond these discussions, as it (a) highlights the regulatory and
political context shaping and constraining responsible business
decisions, (b) emphasizes how business leaders can collaborate with
governments and civil society actors, and (c) discusses how
management can address selected problem areas such as corruption,
political risk, and human rights. The course is divided into two
parts.
The first part looks at why and how the relationship between businesses, governments and civil society is changing, and how this alters the way in which corporations address their responsibilities. We discuss how this changing context creates significant leadership challenges and how practitioners can adequately respond to these challenges. We explore answers to a variety of questions, such as: Can lobbying be responsible? What are the benefits and risks of signing up to initiatives promoting responsible business practices (e.g., Fairtrade and the UN Global Compact)? In how far are firms turning into political actors, and how does that change their responsibilities? What are the risks and opportunities when firms partner with governments, inter-governmental organizations, and NGOs? Using the insights from the first part, the second part focuses on how practitioners can address particular social and environmental problem areas. We discuss especially those problem areas where businesses are increasingly interacting with governmental and/or non-governmental actors. For instance, we focus on questions like: How can labor and human rights be secured when operating global supply chains? How can firms prevent corruption if they operate in diverse cultural contexts? How can firms show responsibility when operating in environments where they are exposed to high degrees of political risk (e.g. in failed or weak states)? The course adopts a multi-disciplinary perspective on the discussed issue areas, blending insights from management studies, economics, and political science. Students are not expected to have specific prior knowledge of these disciplines. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Teaching methods | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The course is based on interactive lecturing enabling students to explore the topics at hand jointly with teaching faculty. Further, students will work in small groups during selected lectures to analyze case studies (e.g. Siemens, IKEA, Starbucks) which provide the basis for class discussion. Lectures also include short video supplements. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected literature | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The course builds on some of the following
readings (selection):
Scherer, A. G., & G. Palazzo (2008). Globalization and Corporate Social Responsibility. In A. Crane et al. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 413-430. Austin, J. (2000). Strategic Collaboration Between Nonprofits and Business.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 69-97. Waddock, S. (2008). Creating a New Institutional Infrastructure for Corporate Responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(3): 87-108. Lawrence, A.T. (2010). Managing Disputes with nonmarket Stakeholders: Wage a Fight, Withdraw, Wait, or Work It out?,California Management Review, 53, 90-113. Moon, J., Crane, A., and Matten D. (2011). Corporations and Citizenship in New Institutions of Global Governance. In Crouch, C. and Maclean, C. (eds.) The Responsible Corporation in a Global Economy. Oxford et al.: Oxford University Press, pp. 203-224. Locke, R., & Romis, M. (2007). Improving Work Conditions in a Global Supply Chain. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(2): 54-62. |
Last updated on
25-02-2014