2015/2016 KAN-CCBLV3000U Business, Government, and Society
English Title | |
Business, Government, and Society |
Course information |
|
Language | English |
Course ECTS | 7.5 ECTS |
Type | Elective |
Level | Full Degree Master |
Duration | One Quarter |
Start time of the course | Third Quarter |
Timetable | Course schedule will be posted at calendar.cbs.dk |
Min. participants | 40 |
Max. participants | 60 |
Study board |
Study Board for BSc og MSc in Business, Language and Culture,
MSc
|
Course coordinator | |
|
|
Main academic disciplines | |
|
|
Last updated on 26-11-2015 |
Learning objectives | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
To achieve the grade 12, students
should meet the following learning objectives with no or only minor
mistakes or errors: To achieve the grade 12, students should meet
the following learning objectives with no or only minor mistakes or
errors: The overall aim of this course is to gain an in-depth
understanding of the different factors influencing the legal,
ethical, and economic responsibilities of firms and their
stakeholders, particularly when considering the changing
relationship between businesses, governments and civil society
actors in different regions of the world.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Examination | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Course content and structure | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
This course approaches corporations’ changing responsibilities in society from the perspective of how business, government, and civil society interact, with a focus, though not exclusively on the global south. The course introduces students to debates on CSR and sustainability, but also reaches beyond these discussions, as it (a) highlights the regulatory and political context shaping and constraining responsible business decisions, (b) emphasizes how business leaders can collaborate with governments and civil society actors, (c) discusses how management can address selected problem areas such as corruption, political risk, and human rights and (d) how CSR impacts communities and society at large seen from the perspectives of the beneficiaries of CSR. The course is divided into two parts.
The first part looks at why and how the relationship between businesses, governments and civil society is changing, and how this alters the way in which corporations address their responsibilities. We discuss how this changing context creates significant leadership challenges and how practitioners can adequately respond to these challenges. We explore answers to a variety of questions, such as: Can lobbying be responsible? What are the benefits and risks of signing up to initiatives promoting responsible business practices (e.g., Fairtrade and the UN Global Compact)? In how far are firms turning into political actors, and how does that change their responsibilities? What are the risks and opportunities when firms partner with governments, inter-governmental organizations, and NGOs?
Using the insights from the first part, the second part focuses on how practitioners can address particular social and environmental problem areas. We discuss especially those problem areas where businesses are increasingly interacting with governmental and/or non-governmental actors. For instance, we focus on questions like: How can labor and human rights be secured when operating global supply chains? How can firms prevent corruption if they operate in diverse cultural contexts? How can firms show responsibility when operating in environments where they are exposed to high degrees of political risk (e.g. in failed or weak states)?
The third part of the elective focuses on the power asymmetries between business/government and communities/civil society and theimpact of CSR as seen from the lens of stakeholders who are impacted by it such as communities and workers. This implies whether CSR is enacted for the moral and ethical good from the perspective of relevant stakeholders. It will also ask how CSR can be used as a strategic tool by companies in the extractives and natural resources sector to obtain legitimacy or a social license to operate? Is CSR always welcomed by neighbouring communities? How do some (indigenous) communities view CSR?
The course adopts a multi-disciplinary perspective on the discussed issue areas, blending insights from management studies, economics, and political science. Students are not expected to have specific prior knowledge of these disciplines. Teaching methods The course is based on interactive lecturing enabling students to explore the topics at hand jointly with teaching faculty. Further, students will work in small groups during selected lectures to analyze case studies (e.g. Shell, Nestlé, Arla, Apple, Barrick Gold) which provide the basis for class discussion. Lectures also include short video supplements. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Teaching methods | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
The course is based on interactive lecturing enabling students to explore the topics at hand jointly with teaching faculty. Further, students will work in small groups during selected lectures to analyze case studies (e.g. Siemens, IKEA, Starbucks) which provide the basis for class discussion. Lectures also include short video supplements. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected literature | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
The course builds on some of the following readings (selection):
Scherer, A. G., & G. Palazzo (2008). Globalization and Corporate Social Responsibility. In A. Crane et al. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 413-430.
Austin, J. (2000). Strategic Collaboration Between Nonprofits and Business.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 69-97.
Banerjee, S. B. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Critical Sociology, 34(1), 51-79.
Banerjee, B and Maher, R (In Review). Resistance is Fertile: Livelihood Struggles and Translocal Resistance against Extractive Industries. Organization Studies
Crane, A., Palazzo, G., Spence, L. J., & Matten, D. (2014). Contesting the value of “creating shared value”. California management review, 56(2), 130-153. Fleming, P. (2012). The end of corporate social responsibility: Crisis and critique. Sage. P 1 -18
Waddock, S. (2008). Creating a New Institutional Infrastructure for Corporate Responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(3): 87-108.
Lawrence, A.T. (2010). Managing Disputes with nonmarket Stakeholders: Wage a Fight, Withdraw, Wait, or Work It out?,California Management Review, 53, 90-113.
Moon, J., Crane, A., and Matten D. (2011). Corporations and Citizenship in New Institutions of Global Governance. In Crouch, C. and Maclean, C. (eds.) The Responsible Corporation in a Global Economy. Oxford et al.: Oxford University Press, pp. 203-224.
Locke, R., & Romis, M. (2007). Improving Work Conditions in a Global Supply Chain. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(2): 54-62. |