• Demonstrate an ability to analyze the social entrepreneurial process.
• Use the concepts and tools seen in the course to identify the elements that need to be considered to develop and strengthen entrepreneurial initiatives aiming at social change.
• Explain and defend a position on issues concerning the social entrepreneurial process in situations that are yet unsettled by research.
• Use the theoretical perspectives discussed in the course as a means of deciding questions involved in social entrepreneurial initiatives.

Social entrepreneurship is a world-wide movement. From micro-finance initiatives to youth houses, fair trade soaps, and community-based art initiatives. There is however no agreement on the definition nor on the nature of the phenomenon that is being called “social entrepreneurship.” Yet, the increase of the discussion and the variety of initiatives do all have one thing in common: a will to achieve social change. The core of this course is social change through the parallel notion of social entrepreneurship. That is, we will look at entrepreneurship as a particular form of organizing for social transformation.
Some of the questions that we will explore throughout the course are: How should we think when designing initiatives aiming at social change? In what instances does a market rationality serve us better than a communitarian one? What conceptual and practical tools can be used in our strive to improve the lives of people and the health of our communities? How can the social be re-articulated in our efforts to catalyze social change?
In sum, we will be looking at rationalities, strategies and tools aiming at social change. For that purpose, we will be using the intellectual tools handed to us by the social sciences to both understand the phenomenon of social entrepreneurship and apply them to thecreation of students’ own social entrepreneurial ventures.
This course is venture based: It will be based on a social venture that students co-create. First because the most effective way to understand social entrepreneurship is to practice it. Second, because the course aims to promote a creative and proactive stance toward the society you live in, not merely an adaptive or critical one.
Thus, this course takes an experiential approach and students are expected to interact with civil society and the social entrepreneurial community, participate in class discussion, and be active participants in the teaching/learning process. Topics will include understanding the problem you want to address, assessing the opportunity, acknowledging the implicit theory of change, considering the venture’s organizational form, funding your initiative, building your board, pitching your initiative, and start assessing social impact.
This course appeals to students with a strong desire to become social entrepreneurs, or work in a social startup, early stage or social entrepreneurial minded company that may be pursued now or later in their careers. It is also for those students who are considering obtaining jobs in consulting, social venture capital, or social foundations where they are dealing with new or relatively new social ventures.

Barinaga, E. 2012. “Overcoming inertia: The social question in social entrepreneurship.” In D.Hjorth (ed.) Handbook on Organisational Entrepreneurship. EdwardElgar.

Baumol, W.J. 1990. “Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive.” Journal of Political Economy, 98(5):893-921.

Brown, T. & Wyatt, J. 2010. “ Design Thinking for Social Innovation.” Stanford Social Innovation Review.

Dees & Andersson. “ Framing a theory of social entrepreneurship: Building on two schools of practice and thought.” In Research on Social Entrepreneurship, pp.39-66.

Dewalt & Dewalt. 2011. “Informal interviewing in participant observation”, pp.137-156 in Participant observation: A guide for fieldworkers. Altamira Press.

Emerson, J. 2003. “The Blended Value Proposition: Integrating Social and Financial Results.” California Management Review, 45(4):35-51.

Garrette, B. and Karnani, A. 2010. “Challenges in Marketing Socially Useful Goods to the Poor.” California Management Review, Vol. 52 (4): 29-47

Granovetter, M. 1973, “ The strength of weak ties.” American Journal of Sociology, 78: 1360-1380.

IDEO: Human Centered Design Toolkit (free download)

Kirk, M., Hickel, J. & Brewer, J. 2015. “ Using Design-Thinking to Eradicate Poverty Creation.” Stanford Social Innovation Review.

Lakoff, George. 2004. “Preface: Reframing is Social Change”. In Don't Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate, pp.xv-xvi. Chelsea Green Publishing.

Parmar, B. 2012. “How to better frame problems.” Darden Business Publishing. Reference no. UVA-G-0630. To be bought at TheCaseCenter.org.

Prahalad, C.K. and Hammond, A. 2002. “Serving the world’s poor, profitably.” R0209C ed.: Harvard Business Review,

Putnam. R.D. 2000. “Thinking about social change in America.” Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Chapters 1, pp. 15–28.

Snow, D.A. et al, 1986. “ Frame Alignment Processes, Micro-mobilization, and Movements Participation” American Sociological Review, 51(4):464-481.