Accounting technologies and technologies in a broader sense,
play a crucial role in organizations and organizing processes.
Rather than being neutral tools to solve problems (or instruments
to steer processes), they can be considered transformative of
organizational realities. To provide an understanding of the
constitutive role of technology in organizing, this course
introduces the material and practice turn in social science and
organization and accounting studies. The aim of the course is to
support students in identifying and analyzing how various
(accounting) technologies are part of Strategy-making,
Organizational practices, and Leadership/management, and to use
these insights in relation to understand how they become part of
practices in organizations. In a more popular sense the aim is to
learn about how accounting technologies (inscriptions and devices)
become part of strategy making or other organizational
transformations, to show and discuss specific practices and to
learn how practitioners calculate when changing organizations.
The course offers a very broad conception of technology. It places
emphasis on technologies for managing economic aspects and the
quantification of organizational life, for instance the tools that
organizations use to make themselves controllable, transparent and
accountable, such as user satisfaction surveys, cost calculations,
evaluations, risk management, etc.
Content:
The course covers four dimensions:
- The material turn in organization and accounting studies is
introduced, as a background for understanding the relationships
between:
- Accounting technologies and Strategy (The role of accounting to
strategy and the like)
- The role of technology in organizational transformations and
developments (for instance, the role of calculations in outsourcing
processes)
- Technology and Leadership/management (how technologies are used
to underpin leadership and management).
The first part of the course introduces various perspectives on
technologies and organizing – the so called material and practice
turn, and establishes a broad understanding of ‘technology’. We
critically examine the claim that technology tends to be left out
of the picture when managers discuss strategy, organizational
processes and leadership/management in organizations. We then
reflect on how we may use insights from the material and practice
turn in social science to broaden the view of strategy,
organization and leadership. In particular, the notion of
performativity – i.e. how economic theories participate in
performing organizational practices - will allow us to open up
otherwise naturalized technologies and reflect upon how they play a
part in the constitution of organizational realities.
The rest of the course is divided into three sections, each
discussing how strategy, organizational processes and
leadership/management are closely intertwined with various
technologies. Each session explores a particular type of
technology, to provide empirically rich examples of how otherwise
unobtrusive elements of organizations and businesses play a
decisive role for their constitution and conduct. The cases also
serve to illustrate how development and implementation processes
may benefit from an understanding of the organizing role of
technologies.
Overlap with the course Organizing Processes
Both Organizing Processes (OP) and Organizing Technologies
(OT) focus on the role of various of technologies in
maintaining and transforming organizations. OT concentrates on the
role of technologies, and draws extensively on Actor-network
Theory. OP includes technologies in a narrower sense, by focusing
on material framing of organizing processes. The theories used in
OP are analytically consistent with those used at OT. The OP
and OT courses are integrated in a shared
workshop
|
Boll, K. (2013). Representing and Performing Businesses: A
Segmentation Model in Action. Journal of Cultural Economy
Callon, M. (2008). Economic Markets and the Rise of Interactive
Agencement. In T. Pinch & R. Swedberg (Eds.), Living in a
Material World: Economic Sociology Meets Science and Technology
Studies (pp. 29-56). Cambridge: MIT press.
Callon, Michel (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation:
domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay in
J. Law, Power, action and belief: a new sociology of
knowledge? Routledge, London, pp. 196-223
Chua, W.F (2007) Accounting, measuring, reporting and strategizing
– Re-using verbs: A review essay. Accounting, Organizations and
Society 32, 487-494
Hayne, C. and Free, C. (2014). Hybridized professional groups and
institutional work: COSO and the rise of enterprise risk
management, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39,
309-330.
Vinnari, E. and Skærbæk, P. (2014). The uncertainties of risk
management. A field study on risk management internal audit
practices in a Finnish municipality, Accounting, Auditing and
Accountability Journal, 27/3, pp. 489-526.
Power, M. (1996) Making things auditable. Accounting,
Organizations and Society, 21(2/3), 289-315
Skærbæk & Tryggestad (2010): The role of accounting devices in
performing corporate strategy. In Accounting, Organizations and
Society 35, 108-124
Skærbæk, P. & S. Thorbjørnsen (2007). The commodification of
the Danish Defence Forces and the troubled identities of its
officers. Financial Accountability & Management,
23(3), 0267-4424
Christensen, M., Skærbæk, P. and Tryggestad, K. Accounting
inscriptions (technologies) in military outsourcing trials of
strength: Time-space dynamics. Working paper
2015.
|