2016/2017 KAN-CCMVV1642U Strategy Making and Value Creation by Using Intangible Assets
English Title | |
Strategy Making and Value Creation by Using Intangible Assets |
Course information |
|
Language | English |
Course ECTS | 7.5 ECTS |
Type | Elective |
Level | Full Degree Master |
Duration | One Quarter |
Start time of the course | Autumn, First Quarter |
Timetable | Course schedule will be posted at calendar.cbs.dk |
Max. participants | 80 |
Study board |
Study Board for MSc in Economics and Business
Administration
|
Course coordinator | |
|
|
Kontaktinformation: https://e-campus.dk/studium/kontakt eller Contact information: https://e-campus.dk/studium/kontakt | |
Main academic disciplines | |
|
|
Last updated on 01-12-2016 |
Learning objectives | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To achieve the grade 12, students
should meet the following learning objectives with no or only minor
mistakes or errors: As future leaders of organizations, course
participants will be equipped with relevant professional skills,
intensified by up-to-date practical insights for managing
intangibles in local and global business contexts. Case studies are
selected to gain insights into best practices and allow each
student to make an independent judgment of critical intangibles put
to use.
Participants will not only get novel insights by unique case material, drawn from on-going research activities. They will also be exposed to the current discourse on the measuring and management of intangibles to which researchers at the CBS contribute. Students should be able to reflect upon the consequences of applying different theories on a given management issue. Depending on earlier specialization and business practice, each student will be assisted in building his och her expertise through the identification, development and possible use of intangible resources and capabilities to create value. Course participants, starting to prepare a Master thesis project, will be assisted by the teaching staff during the course. To be awarded the highest mark (12) the student should meet the following learning objectives wityh no or only minor mistakes and errors:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Examination | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Course content and structure | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This course is about business firms and other organizations that master their "hidden resources and capabilities" (intangible assets) when shaping strategy, managing innovation and incremental change, and creating value.
The course is based on individual readings and combines lectures with group work and plenary discussions, plus case presentations. Such mini-workshops linked to the lectures/plenary sessions are essential parts of the course. Here, the case presentations are discussed and the students will be able to introduce project ideas and draft papers that could be edited into synopsis to be used during the final examination. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Teaching methods | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The eight sessions of the course are
structured according to international textbook materials, provided
by the course organizers with support from more than 30 specialists
on strategy and management in Asia and Europe.
Apart from the lectures and other presentations, the course is a combination of several types of learning and builds on continuous interaction during the course period of eight weeks with other CBS teachers, external experts and resource persons from business and the public sector: 1. Reviews of analytical perspectives on the management and measuring of intangibles and on ‘knowledge-intensive’ or ‘intelligent’ organizations. 2. Extensive readings (of required and optional literature). 3. Brief group presentations and assessments of various methods, tools or instruments for strategy making and value creation in practice. Course participants will benefit from a quality assurance approach, developed at the CBS to make this course more relevant and adaptive to changing student demands. An elected group of course participants will support the course coordinator and the lecturers in securing a high level of quality and relevance of the contents of the course. The work of the quality assurance group (which meets briefly every week – immediately after class) will be pro-active and benefit from the flexible course organization. The quality assurance group should influence positively also the week-by-week planning of the joint course work. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Student workload | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected literature | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Examples of course readings:
Busco, C, et al (2014). Leading Practices in Integrated Reporting, Strategic Finance, September 2014, pp. 23-32.
Ciborra, C. U. and R. Andreu (2002). Knowledge across Boundaries: Managing Knowledge in Distributed Organizations. The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge. Edited by C. W. Choo and N. Bontis. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 575-586.
Ciborra, C. U. and R. Andreu (2002). Knowledge across Boundaries: Managing Knowledge in Distributed Organizations.The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge. Edited by C. W. Choo and N. Bontis. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 575-586.
Danish Agency for Trade and Industry (2000). A guideline for intellectual capital statements. A key to knowledge management. Copenhagen, Danish Agency for Trade and Industry (selected pages).
DTI (2001), Creating value from your intangible assets: Unlocking your true potential. London: Department of Trade and Industry.
Giraudeau, M. (2012). “Imagining (the Future) Business: How to Make Firms with Plans?”, in Imagining Organizations: Performative Imagery in Business and Beyond. Edited by F.-R. Puyou, P. Quattrone, et al. New York: Routledge, pp. 213-229.
Hagel, J., J. S. Brown et al (2013). From exponential technologies to exponential innovation. (Report 2 of the 2013 Shift Index series). San José, Deloitte Center for the Edge.
Hagel, J., J. S. Brown, et al. (2008). "Shaping Strategy in a World of Constant Disruption." Harvard Business Review (October).
InCas (2007). Intellectual Capital Models. Berlin, Fraunhofer Institute for Production Systems and Design Technology, 14 pp.
International Integrated Reporting Council (2013). Summary of Significant Issues: The International <IR> Framework, London: IIRC, 50 pp.
International Integrated Reporting Council (2013). The International <IR> Framework, London: IIRC, 35 pp.
Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton (2004). Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes. Boston, Harvard Business School Press, pp. 29-56.
Kaplan, R. S. (2010). Conceptual Foundations of the Balanced Scorecard. Cambridge, Harvard Business School Working Paper 10-074, pp. 1-36.
Marr, B. (2008). Impacting Future Value: How to Manage your Intellectual Capital, Mississauga (Canada): The Society of Management Accountants of Canada, 31 pp.
Mouritsen, J. and H. T. Larsen (2005). "The 2nd wave of knowledge management: The management control of knowledge resources through intellectual capital formation." Management Accounting Research 16, pp. 371-394.
Probst, G., B. Büchel, and S. Raub (1998). “Knowledge as a Strategic Resource.” In Knowing in Firms: Understanding, Managing and Measuring Knowledge, edited by G. von Krogh, J. Roos and D. Kleine, London: Sage, pp. 240-52.
Raustiala, K. & C. J. Sprigman (2006). ”The Piracy Paradox: Innovation and intellectual property in fashion design”. Virginia Law Review, Vol. 92, selected pages. (UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 06-04.)
Rumelt, R. (2011). “Using Advantage”, in Good Strategy/Bad Strategy, New York: Crown, Chapter 12, pp. 160-177.
Weick, K. E. and K. M. Sutcliffe (2001). Managing the Unexpected: Assuring High Performance in an Age of Complexity. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass (Selected pages). |