To achieve the grade 12, students
should meet the following learning objectives with no or only minor
mistakes or errors: By completion of the course strategic change
management, the student should be able to:
- Analyze and synthesize concrete problems within strategic
change management by applying the concepts, theories, methods, and
models to the course.
- Reflect upon the various change management perspectives, which
are discussed as well as reflect upon the consequences of choosing
one perspective as a dominant perspective (The
meta-perspective).
- Link strategic, planning based, and interpersonal aspects of
change management.
|
In this course, we will explore different leadership
rationalities and how to work with change management and its
perspectives. We will emphasize which organizational factors to
include in concerns regarding the use of generic change management
approaches, among these external or internal factors. The
methodological approach to the course is based on theory
discussions, group work and change management cases. Starting with
a generic instrumental approach, we will learn what it can bring of
added value to change management. We will supplement this by
exploring what cannot be captured in this perspective by bringing
perspectives from e.g. resource dependency theory and complexity
theory to give a more nuanced picture of change management.
Furthermore, we will raise the change management approach from a
planning approach to a strategic discipline. The course contains a
high degree of practice relevance through the use of e.g. cases and
simulations. During the course, we will have guest teachers, among
these experienced change management practitioners and teachers with
expertise in the field. The course is intensive and requires real
commitment and willingness from the students to enter into
exploring and discussing different rationalities and real life
cases in the light of the literature.
The course’s development of personal competences:
The course focuses on strategic competencies in analyzing change
initiatives. However, it also provides inter-personal competencies
through its collaborative form and focus as well as individual
development.
|
- Book: Palmer, Ian, Richard Dunford, and Gib Akin. (2009)
Managing Organizational Change – a Multiple Perspectives Approach.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin. (412 pages) 2end.international edition.
- Brown, Tim. (2008) Design Thinking. Harvard business Review.
(10 pages)
- Burnes, Bernard. (2004a) “Kurt Lewin and the planned approach
to change: a re-appraisal.” Journal of Management Studies. Vol. 41,
No. 6: 972-1002. (30 pages)
- Chia, Robert. (1999) “A ‘Rhizomic’ Model of Organizational
Change and Transformation: Perspective from a Metaphysics of
Change.” British Journal of Management. Vol. 10: 209- 227. (20
pages)
- Conger, Jay A. (2000) “Effective Change Begins at the Top.” In
Beer & Nohria, Breaking the Code of Change. Harvard Business
School Press. (20 pages)
- Cooper, Robert. (1986) “Organization/Disorganization.” Social
Science Information. Vol. 25, 2:299-335. Suggested
reading.
- Hart, Stuart L. 1992. "An Integrative Framework for
Strategy-Making Processes." Academy of Management Review 17:
327-351 (24 pages)
- Huy, Quy Nguyen. 2011. "How Middle Managers'
Group-Focus Emotions and Social Identities Influence Strategy
Implementation." Strategic Management Journal 32 (13):
1387-1410 (23 pages).
- Huy, Quy Nguyen & Henry Mintzberg (2003). “The Rhythm of
Change.” MIT Sloan Management Review. Vol. 44, no. 4: 79-84. (5
pages)
- Huy, Quy Nguyen. (2001) “Time, Temporal Capability, and Planned
Change.” Academy of Management Review. Vol. 26, No. 4: 601-623. (20
pages)
- Nahapiet, Janine and Sumantra Ghoshal. (1998) “Social Capital,
Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage.” Academy of
Management Review. Vol. 23, No. 2: 242-266. (25 pages)
- Ouchi, T., & Wilkins, A. (1985) “Organizational Culture.”
Annual Review of Sociology. Vol. 11: 457-483. (30 pages) (suggested
reading)
-
Palmer, I. & Dunford, R. (2008) ”Organizational Change and
the Importance of Embedded Assumptions” British Journal of
Management, Vol. 19, S20–S32
-
Schein, E. (2003) “Five traps for consulting psychologists. Or,
how I learned to take culture seriously”. Consulting Psychology
Journal: Practice and Research, 55(2): 75-83. Suggested
reading
- Shaw, Patricia. (1997) “Intervening in the Shadow Systems of
Organizations – Consulting from a Complexity Perspective.” Journal
of Organizational Change Management. Vol. 10, No. 2: 235-250. (15
pages)
- Stacey, Ralph. (2003a) “Organizations as Complex Responsive
Processes of Relating.” Journal of Innovative Management. Vol. 8,
No. 2, Winter 2002/2003. (20 pages)
- Stacey, R.D (2007): Strategic Management and Organizational
Dynamics: The Challenge of Complexity (to Ways of Thinking About
Organisations). Chapter 10: Responsive processes thinking,
Financial Times/ Prentice Hall, s. 242-267. Suggested
reading
- Steven H. Appelbaum, Sally Habashy, Jean-Luc Malo, Hisham
Shafiq, (2012),"Back to the future: revisiting Kotter's
1996 change model", Journal of Management Development, Vol. 31
Iss: 8 pp. 764 – 782 Suggested reading
- Weick, Karl E. (2000) ”Emergent change as a Universal in
Organizations.” In Beer & Nohria, Breaking the Code of Change.
Harvard Business School Press. (20
pages)
|
|