2016/2017 KAN-CINTO1015U Communication in Action on the Social web
English Title | |
Communication in Action on the Social web |
Course information |
|
Language | English |
Course ECTS | 7.5 ECTS |
Type | Mandatory |
Level | Full Degree Master |
Duration | One Semester |
Start time of the course | Spring |
Timetable | Course schedule will be posted at calendar.cbs.dk |
Study board |
Study Board for BSc/MSc in Business Administration and
Information Systems, MSc
|
Course coordinator | |
|
|
Main academic disciplines | |
|
|
Last updated on 28-11-2016 |
Learning objectives | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To achieve the grade 12, students
should meet the following learning objectives with no or only minor
mistakes or errors:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Examination | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Course content and structure | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
According to Kling, social informatics is "the
interdisciplinary study of the design, uses and consequences of
information technologies that takes into account their interaction
with institutional and cultural contexts". In the past years,
we have witnessed a seemingly profound shift in the use of
web-based technologies as lightweight, end-user friendly social
tools for communication, socialization, and collaboration have
become one of the most popular applications for the world wide web.
We no longer have to look at corporate intranets to see web
technology be used for massive collaboration and communication.
Facebook, Twitter, Linked-in, Sina Weibo, blogs, wikis, recommender
engines, - all this, and more, have thoroughly changed the face of
networked practices around the world, and the consequences are far
from confined to the technological or the virtual. New information
practices have “real” consequences.
The subjects of analysis will be centered upon both work and
leisure technologies such as intranets, mobile communication, and
recent developments in social software practices such as (micro)
blogging, wiki's, peer-to-peer sharing, wearable technologies
and their attendant infrastructures.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Teaching methods | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The classes are structured around
close reading, reflections and critique of the course literature.
The mini-project will be based on the student groups’ own choice of a digital social technology (e.g. Facebook, Sina Weibo, FourSquare, LinkedIn, Twitter, Tripadvisor, Instagram, Wikipedia, Podio, and FitBit, JawBone, and other quantified self technologies). The groups must then apply (depending on relevance) at least 3 of the principles discussed in class on their case and argue for their usefulness for the analysis and understanding of the particular social medium. The analysis must be based on on-line observations of user behavior and interactions using the chosen technology. To gain a solid basis for the mini-project, each student group is expected to engage actively in the technology in question, and document this with example screendumps etc. All projects should take point of departure in the uploaded presentation(s) that the group made during the course. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Student workload | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected literature | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Björneborn, L (2005): Small World Network Exploration, http://vip.db.dk/lb/papers/bjorneborn_2005_small-world_network_exploration.pdf
Borgatti, S.P, and Foster, P.C. (2003). The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology, in Journal of Management, 29/6, 2003, also available here http://www.analytictech.com/borgatti/papers/borgattifoster.pdf
Ciolfi, L, Fitzpatric, G, and Bannon, L (2008): Settings for Collaboration: the Role of Place, in Computer Supported Cooperative Work (2008) 17:91–96
Clemmensen, T. (2012). Adapting e-gov Usability Evaluation to Cultural Contexts In E. Buie & D. Murray (Eds.), Usability in Government Systems: User Experience Design for Citizens and Public Servants (pp. 331-346). NY: Morgan Kaufmann.
Clemmensen, T. (2011). Designing a Simple Folder Structure for a Complex Domain. Human Technology, 7 (3), 216-249.
Campos, P., & Campos, A. (2009). SimCompany: An Educational Game Created through a Human-Work Interaction Design Approach. Paper presented at the Human-Computer Interaction–INTERACT 2009.
Cecez-Kecmanovic, Galliers, Henfridson, Newell and Vidgen (2014). The Sociomateriality of Information Systems; Current Status, Future Directions. MIS Quarterly Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 809-830/September 2014
Contarello, A., Fortunati, L., & Sarrica, M. (2007). Social thinking and the mobile phone: A study of social change with the diffusion of mobile phones, using a social representations framework. Continuum, 21(2), 149-163.
Day, R. (2007). Kling and the “critical”: Social informatics and critical informatics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(4), 575-582.
Dittrich et al (eds.) 2005: International reports on socio-informatics, pp. 15-20, 30-43. 52-59, available here: http://www.iisi.de/fileadmin/IISI/upload/IRSI/IRSIv2i2.pdf
Dourish, P (2004). What we talk about when we talk about context, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, Vol. 8/1, 2004
Eagle, N, & Pentland, A (2005): Social Serendipity: Mobilizing Social Software, http://reality.media.mit.edu/pdfs/serendipity.pdf
Fortunati, Leopoldina. "User design and the democratization of the mobile phone." First Monday (2006)., in http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1615/1530
Gal, U., & Berente, N. (2008). A social representations perspective on information systems implementation. Information Technology & People, 21(2), 133-154.
Granovetter, M.S. (1973): The Strength of Weak Ties, in American journal of sociology, 78, 1360 available at http://www.stanford.edu/dept/soc/people/mgranovetter/documents/granstrengthweakties.pdf
Haddon, L. (2001): Domestication and Mobile Telephony. Paper presented at ‘Machines that Become Us’, Rutgers University, New Jersey, US, April 2001, available here http://www.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/whosWho/AcademicStaff/LeslieHaddon/Domestication%20and%20mobile.pdf
Harrison, S. Dourish, P (1996). Re-place-ing space: the roles of place and space in collaborative systems. In Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW '96)
Kaplan, A.M. and Haenleina, M (2009), Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media, in Business Horizons Volume 53, Issue 1, January-February 2010, Pages 59-68
Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. (2006). Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design: MIT Press Cambridge, MA. (whole book) Kling, R. (2000). Learning about information technologies and social change: The contribution of social informatics. The Information Society, 16(3), 217-232.
Messetter, J. (2009) “Place-Specific Computing: A Place-centric Perspective for Digital Designs”, in International Journal of Design, 3:1. Available at http://www.ijdesign.org/ojs/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/353/239
Newman et al (2002). Designing for serendipity: supporting end-user configuration of ubiquitous computing environments, in DIS '02 Proceedings of the 4th conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques
Orlikowski, W (2010): The sociomateriality of organisational life: considering technology in management research Available at http://cje.oxfordjournals.org/content/34/1/125.full
Orlikowski, W, and Iacono, SC. (2001): Desperately Seeking the IT in IT research; A call to theorizing the IT artifact, in Information Systems Research, Vol 12, No.2, 2001
Postill, John, and Sarah Pink. "Social media ethnography: the digital researcher in a messy web." Media International Australia 145 (2012): 123-134.
Sahay, S, Robey, D (1996). Organizational context, social interpretation, and the implementation and consequences of geographic information systems, in Accounting Management & Information Technology, Vol. 6, No. 4, 1996
Salovaara, A, Tamminen, S (2009): “Accept or appropriate? A design-oriented critique on technology acceptance models”. Preprint draft available at: http://www.hiit.fi/~asalovaa/articles/salovaara-tamminen-2009-acceptance-or-appropriation-draft-for-web.pdf
Sawyer, Steve, Eschenfelder, Kristin R (2002). "Social informatics: Perspectives, examples, and trends”, in Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36, 1, 2002
Scott SV, Orlikowski WJ. ‘Getting the Truth’: Exploring the Material Grounds of Institutional Dynamics in Social Media 2009. Paper presented at the 25th European Group for Organizational Studies Conference, Barcelona, Spain, available at http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/26699/
Thom-Santelli, J (2007) “Mobile Social Software: Facilitating Serendipity or Encouraging Homogeneity? ” Pervasive Computing, 3, 2007
Wakkary, R and Tannenbaum, K (2009) A sustainable identity: the creativity of an everyday designer, Proc. of CHI2009, Boston, 2009
Wittel, A (2001): Towards a Network Sociality, Theory, Culture & Society, Sage, London, Vol. 19(6), 51-76) |