2017/2018 BA-BISHO1002U Organizational Analysis
English Title | |
Organizational Analysis |
Course information |
|
Language | English |
Course ECTS | 7.5 ECTS |
Type | Mandatory |
Level | Bachelor |
Duration | One Quarter |
Start time of the course | Autumn, Second Quarter |
Timetable | Course schedule will be posted at calendar.cbs.dk |
Study board |
Study Board for BSc in International Shipping and
Trade
|
Course coordinator | |
|
|
Main academic disciplines | |
|
|
Last updated on 14-12-2017 |
Relevant links |
Learning objectives | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
To achieve the grade 12, students should meet the
following learning objectives with no or only minor mistakes or
errors: At the end of the course, the students should be able to:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Examination | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Course content and structure | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
This course has three main objectives. Firstly, we will familiarize you with basic concepts of organization, such as design, communication, leadership, learning and innovation; and the way they have been understood historically in organisation studies. Secondly, we will introduce you to a processual view of organizing to understand and analyse the phenomenon of organization in a fast moving and constantly changing world. Lastly, we asks you to critically engage with these concepts in groups while analysing cases from the shipping industry and presenting them in class.
The focus of organization analysis is organization as a subject in itself. This means that we will look at various industries, not only shipping, with regard to organization, as well as trends in professional organization in public and private sector. The purpose of this focus is to stimulate innovation from other industries into the shipping industry. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Teaching methods | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The journey through the organizational landscape
will have tree reflective stops or elements. Based on a range of
teaching methods and course materials, the concepts from the course
will be introduced in class. As you exit the class room and enter
your maritime context, you will apply these concepts in practice.
After your practical application of the theories we will meet in
class again and discuss what you found and learned. In this way
there is a threefold division of the learning process: 1) classical
organizational theory teaching, 2) practical application in
maritime context and 3) discussion of learning output of the theory
in practice exercise. This oral theory in practice exercise is
performed in groups formed in the first session. The philosophy
behind this design is that different kinds of learning appears in
the classroom through presentation of different theories and in the
field through application in practice and that the best results
occur when these contexts and modes of learning are combined.
Guest speakers from maritime companies and visits to maritime contexts will allow us to obtain insight into how classical organizational management theories work in the maritime world: what are their weaknesses and what are their strengths - and how can you work with organizational issues in a maritime world on sea. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Feedback during the teaching period | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Feedback are given in class during group work | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Student workload | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected literature | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Anteby, Michel, Elena Corsi and Emilie Billaud (2012) Automating the Paris Subway. Harvard Business Case no. 9-413-061. Please buy through one of these links: www.thecasecentre.org/educators/products/view?id=112299 http://hbsp.harvard.edu/product/cases
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978) Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective, Reading, Mass: Addison Wesley.
Bass, Bernard (1990) From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics 18(3), pp.19-31
Boje, David. M. (1991) The storytelling organization: A study of story performance in an office-supply firm. Administrative Science Quarterly 36(1):106–126.
Callon, M., (1998), 'An essay on framing and overflowing: economic externalities revisited by sociology', in Callon, M., (Ed.), The Laws of the Markets, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 244-269. (pdf)
Carlile, Paul R. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, Vol. 13, No.4, pp. 442-455.
Corvellec, Hervé & Annette Risberg (2007) Sensegiving as mise-en-sens -The case of wind power development. Scandinavian Journal of Management, vol. 23, nr. 3, pp. 306-326
Fourcade, M (2010): Price and Prejudice: On Economics and the Enchantment (and Disenchantment) of Nature, in: Beckert/Aspers, The Worth Of Goods: Valuation and Pricing in the Economy. Oxford University Press, 2010. P. 50-58
George, Rose (2013): Deep Sea and Foreign Going. Inside Shipping, the Invisible Industry that Brings you 90% of Everything, Portobello
Glassman, Michael and Min Ju Kang (2010 Pragmatism, connectionism and the internet: A mind’s perfect storm. Computers in Human Behaviour 26(6):1412-1418.
Hanninen, H. I., and J. S. Laurila. “Risk Regulation in the Baltic Sea Ferry Traffic: The Successive Failures of Bow Visor Technology.” Science, Technology & Human Values 33, no. 6 (February 13, 2008)
Hernes, T., and E. J. Irgens. “Keeping Things Mindfully on Track: Organizational Learning under Continuity.” Management Learning 44, no. 3 (July 1, 2013): 253–66. doi:10.1177/1350507612445258.
Hernes, Tor (2008) Organization as process – theory for a tangled world. London: Routledge. (ch. 8) (pdf)
Hernes, Tor, Birgitte Schäffner, Edda Hendrup (2014) Sensing the momentum: A process view of change in an MNC. Journal of Change Management 15(2):117-141
Hutter, Bridget M., ed. Anticipating Risks and Organising Risk Regulation. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Chapter 1
Katona, Z/ Sarvary, M (2014): Berkely-Haas Case Series, Maersk Line: B2B Social Media – „It’s communication, not marketing“, University o California Berkeley, Vol. 56, No.3, Spring 2014
Levinson, Marc (2008): The Box: How the Shipping Container Made the World Smaller and the World Economy Bigger, Princeton University Press
Lundberg, Craig (2004) Is there really nothing so practical as a good theory?Business Horizons 47(5):7-14).
Nonaka I. (1988) Toward Middle-Up-Down Management: Accelerating Information Creation. Sloan Management Review, Spring Vol. 29 (3): 9-18. (pdf.)
Orr, Julian (1998) Images of work. Science, Technology, & Human Values 43(4):439-455
Perrow, C (1981): Normal accidents at three Mile Island, in: Society, Vol. 18(5), p 17-26
Pye, Annie (2005) Leadership and organizing: Sensemaking in action. Leadership 1(1):31-50.
Roberto, Michael A. and Gina M. Carioggia (2003) Mount Everest 1996. Harvard Business School Case.
Tannenbaum, Robert and Warren H. Schmidt (1973) How to choose a leadership pattern. Harvard Business Review May-June 1973. Pp 3-12. (accessible online through CBS library)
Søderberg, A-M (2006) Narrative interviewing and narrative analyses in a study of a Cross-border Merger. Management International Review, 46:4:397-416
Movies A Highjacking, 2012, Thomas Lindholm 12 Angry Men, 1957, Sidney Lumet |