2019/2020 BA-BEOKV1009U Between Theory and Practice: Self-Reflection towards Responsible Decision Making
English Title | |
Between Theory and Practice: Self-Reflection towards Responsible Decision Making |
Course information |
|
Language | English |
Course ECTS | 7.5 ECTS |
Type | Elective |
Level | Bachelor |
Duration | One Semester |
Start time of the course | Autumn, Spring |
Timetable | Course schedule will be posted at calendar.cbs.dk |
Max. participants | 35 |
Study board |
Study Board for BA in English and Organisational
Communication
|
Course coordinator | |
|
|
Main academic disciplines | |
|
|
Teaching methods | |
|
|
Last updated on 12-02-2019 |
Relevant links |
Learning objectives | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Examination | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Course content, structure and pedagogical approach | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The aim of this course is to promote and support the process of self-reflection in the decision making process. Students will work through a series of activities that relate to democratic (and non-democratic) decision making. This forms the basis for conversations about freedom, equality, majorities, minorities and conflict, both in society and in the classroom. The class itself acts as the society and is given the opportunity to reflect not only on the topics 'out there' but also within the dynamics of the group itself, thereby making the discussions relevant and increasing the capacity to practice this type of reflection. Students will learn about decision making in theory and practice. They will learn about themselves and will be able to apply this knowledge in future decision making processes. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description of the teaching methods | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The course will contain a mix of methods. It will
consist of lectures and in-depth discussions on the relevant
topics, and it will also contain interactive, group activities,
where groups work on a task and then come back to the larger group
to reflect and discuss together. The course gives continuous
opportunity to practice self-reflection, and it will also include
the discomfort that comes with this kind of reflection. This will
be supported by the course coordinator.
Students are expected to attend at-least 80% of the classes, as the final assignment draws on the content of the classes throughout the course. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Feedback during the teaching period | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
This takes place in connection with ongoing course exercises in class, comprising peer student response and discussions. Teacher-student exchanges are made throughout the course, and the teacher is available for personal office hours once a week. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Student workload | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected literature | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2010). Social identity and
self-categorization. In J. F. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick, &
V. M. Esses (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of prejudice,
stereotyping and discrimination (pp. 179–193). London: Sage.
Bohm, David. (2013). On Dialogue. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Krishnamurti, Jiddu (1964) Think on these things Harper & Row, New York.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole. |