Learning objectives |
To achieve the grade 12, students should meet the
following learning objectives with no or only minor mistakes or
errors:
- be familiar with and be able to analyze, compare and critically
reflect upon the concepts, theories and perspectives relating to
strategy that have been presented and discussed during the
course
- understand and be able to explain and reflect upon strategy in
a broader, cultural historical perspective
- be able to put the concepts, theories and perspectives of the
course to empirical use in an analysis within a strategic
horizon
- exemplify concepts and theories by relating them to present day
challenges met by contemporary organizations
|
Examination |
Strategi:
|
Exam
ECTS |
7,5 |
Examination form |
Home assignment - written product |
Individual or group exam |
Individual exam |
Size of written product |
Max. 15 pages |
Assignment type |
Written assignment |
Duration |
48 hours to prepare |
Grading scale |
7-point grading scale |
Examiner(s) |
One internal examiner |
Exam period |
Autumn |
Make-up exam/re-exam |
Same examination form as the ordinary
exam
|
|
Course content, structure and pedagogical
approach |
The course reflects upon the challenges in the short history of
business strategy, which takes its beginning in the 1960s, and
commences by looking at the role of the organizational environment.
However, the course will also go beyond business strategy, and
through work with literature and philosophy, we will sketch a
broader history of strategy as strategic sight. We start
with the structure of the industry within which a firm operates and
investigate its implications for the possible performance of a firm
and the strategic directions necessary to attain abnormal returns.
Despite the appeal of rational, systematic, and scientifically
enhanced analysis of the organizational environment and its
internal resource base in order to compute ideal courses of action
(as is typical for a top-down planning approach to strategy, for
instance), many questions remain. In the course, we will
therefore look at both the more rational (and often predominantly
North- American approaches) to marshalling the business
environment, as well as the more critical (and often more European)
approaches that have come to understand strategy from sociological,
philosophical, critical or ecological perspectives. We also
question the notion of ‘change’ as an opposition to ‘stability’ and
investigate how ‘strategy’ can be initiated in light of continuous
changes, complex and contingent environments and the implications
of organizational cultures and habitualized work routines which may
resist change attempts initiated by managers. We start from the
more formal investigation of the strategic context and the
possibilities for strategic analysis and control. We then move
towards the ‘inside’ of the firm, where we discuss resource bases,
competences and capabilities of the firm. From here, we move on to
reflect on how strategy practice enables the strategist to
distinguish a limited range of phenomenon from their
undifferentiated surroundings through strategic
sight.
|
Description of the teaching methods |
The course connects theory and practice, blending
reflection with ability and integrity - at all levels. The course
is intensive with diverse readings - there is no textbook -
demanding a high level of engagement and a commitment to draw on
and experiment with strategy in practice. |
Feedback during the teaching period |
Oral feedback in the classroom and after the
written exam |
Student workload |
Forelæsninger |
36 hours |
Eksamen |
48 hours |
Forberedelse |
123 hours |
|
Expected literature |
PORTER, M. E. 1996. What is strategy? Harvard Business
Review, November- December, 61-78.
WHITTINGTON, R. 2004. Strategy after modernism: recovering
practice. European Management Review, 1, 62-68.
|
PORTER, M. E. 2008/1979. The five forces that shape strategy.
Harvard Business Review, January, 23-41, reprint.
|
BARNEY, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive
advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120.
TEECE, D. J., PISANO, G. & SHUEN, A. 1997. Dynamic
capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management
Journal, 18, 509-533.
JOHNSON, G. 1992. Managing strategic change - strategy, culture
and action. Long Range Planning, 25, 28-36.
|
MINTZBERG, H. & MCHUGH, A. 1985. Strategy formation in an
adhocracy.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 160-197.
CHIA, R. & HOLT, R. 2009. Strategy without design: the
silent efficacy of indirect action, Cambridge, Cambridge
University Press.
|
JARZABKOWSKI, P., BALOGUN, J. & SEIDL, D. 2007.
Strategizing: The challenges of a practice perspective. Human
Relations, 60, 5-27.
JARZABKOWSKI, P. & SPEE, A. P. 2009. Strategy-as-practice: a
review and future directions for the field. International
Journal of Management Reviews, 11, 69- 95.
|
|
|