• Describe, classify, and combine the concepts and methods of the course.
• Analyse concrete problems faced by firms developing sustainable goods/markets by applying the concepts and methods of the course.
• Discuss the possible roles of markets in overcoming environmental and social challenges.

This course is part of the group of three electives qualifying you for the “CBS cand.merc./M.Sc. Minor in Sustainable Business'.  The course can also be attented without taking the minor.

Entrepreneurship and markets are increasingly seen as plausible sources for solutions to reduce carbon (or other) polluting emissions and economize on the use of limited natural resources. The question is how, and under what conditions, this may be the case? What does it take to make markets shift to new and environmentally more viable products? With the help of analytical concepts from recent material market studies and the new economic sociology, this course provides the students with concepts and methods to understand markets (products, consumers and whole new market arrangements) for sustainable products as practical achievements. Students will learn to understand and analyze how sustainable products and processes are facilitated or hindered by the existing technical infrastructure, the regulative arrangement, the construction of value, and networks between corporations, regulators, consumers, social movements, claims to legitimacy, and the frames of knowledge used to construct and evaluate a particular market regime. In the context of bringing new sustainable goods/technologies to the market, innovation is not only about heroic entrepreneurs, but depends on transforming the lock-in of existing technologies and enrolling a long list of unglamorous characters including calculative tools, new practices of valuation, standards, trials and tests, and the human and non-human participants in chains of production and commercialization.

This course is part of the minor in Sustainable Business

 

Callon, M. (1998): “An essay on framing and overflowing: economic externalities revisited by sociology”, in M. Callon (ed.): “The Laws of the Markets”, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers: 244-269.

Coase, R. (1988): “The Firm, the Market and the Law”: Chapter 1, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press: 1-31.

Cochoy, F. and Vabre, M. (2004) “From Political Consumption to Political Production or the Resistible Implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility in a French Mining Company” in Political Consumerism: Its motivations, power, and conditions in the Nordic countries and elsewhere. Proceedings from the 2nd International Seminar on Political Consumerism, Oslo August 26-29, 2004.

Corvellec, H., M. J. Zapata, and P. Zapata (2013): “Infrastructures, lock-in, and sustainable urban development: the case of waste incineration in the Göteborg Metropolitan Area”, in Journal of Cleaner Production vol. 50: 32-39.

Dubuisson-Quellier, S. (2013): “A Market Mediation Strategy: How Social Movements Seek to Change Firms’ Practices by Promoting New Principles of Product Valuation”, in Organization Studies, vol. 34(5-6): 683-703.

Ehrenstein, V., and Muniesa, F. (2014): “The Conditional Sink: Counterfactual. Display in the Valuation of a Carbon Offsetting Reforestation Project”, Valuation Studies1(2) 161–188.

Fourcade, M. (2011): “Price and Prejudice: On Economics, and the Enchantment/ Disenchantment of Nature”, in Beckert, Jens and PatrikAspers (eds.) “The Worth of Goods”, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Garcia-Parpet, M.F. (2007): “The Social Construction of a Perfect Market – The Strawberry Auction at Fontaines-en-Sologne”, in MacKenzie, D., F. Muniesa and L. Siu “Do Economists Make Markets”, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Ingram, P., & Rao, H. (2004): “Store Wars: The Enactment and Repeal of Anti‐Chain‐Store Legislation in America”. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 446-487.

Lohmann, L. (2009): “Toward a different debate in environmental accounting: The cases of carbon and cost–benefit”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(3), 499-534.

Lohmann, L., and Böhm, S. (2012): "Critiquing carbon markets: A conversation." Ephemera 12 (1): 81-96.

McFall, L. and J. Óssandón (forthcoming): What’s new in the ‘new, new economic sociology’ and should Organisation Studies care?

Mirowski, P. (2013):“The Red Guide to the Neoliberal Playbook”, in “Never Let a Serious Crisis Go to Waste: How Neoliberalism Survived the Financial Meltdown”, London: Verso.

Musselin, C. & C. Paradeise (2005): “Quality: A Debate” Sociologie du Travail, 47, S89–S123

Rao, H. (2009): “You can’t get people to sit on an explosion!’ The cultural acceptance of car in America”, in H. Rao “Market Rebels”. Chapter 2, pp. 18-42. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Reijonen. S. and K. Tryggestad (2012): “The dynamic signification of product qualities: on the possibility of ‘greening’ markets”, in Consumption, Markets & Culture vol. 15 (2): 213-234.

Roth, A. (2007): “The Art of Designing Markets”, in Harvard Business Review, October.

Stark, D. (2009): “The Sense of Dissonance – Accounts of Worth in Economic Life”, Chapter 1, pp. 1-31, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

Unruh, C.G. (2000): “Understanding carbon lock-in”, in Energy Policy, vol. 28: 817-830.

Unruh, C.G. (2002): “Escaping carbon lock-in”, in Energy Policy, vol. 30: 317-325.