2020/2021 BA-BDMAO2003U Globalisation, Outsourcing and Virtual Organising
English Title | |
Globalisation, Outsourcing and Virtual Organising |
Course information |
|
Language | English |
Course ECTS | 7.5 ECTS |
Type | Mandatory |
Level | Bachelor |
Duration | One Semester |
Start time of the course | Autumn |
Timetable | Course schedule will be posted at calendar.cbs.dk |
Study board |
BSc in Digital Management
|
Course coordinator | |
|
|
Main academic disciplines | |
|
|
Teaching methods | |
|
|
Last updated on 31-08-2020 |
Relevant links |
Learning objectives | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Examination | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Course content, structure and pedagogical approach | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The course will take its point of departure in the global restructuring of industries and look at how offshoring and outsourcing of work can be managed through virtual platforms and virtual teamwork.
The scene will be set with lectures about developments at the macro-level, about the three waves of globalization and the move from global value chains to global production and innovation networks. These introductory lectures aim to give the students an understanding of how industries are developing global production and innovation networks, a development that creates a need for virtual organizing. They also draw attention to the fact that firms must learn to govern activities that are globally dispersed, either internally through strategies of offshoring and foreign direct investments or externally through outsourcing.
The second part of the course deals with global virtual collaboration and boundary spanning at a team level. It introduces literature dealing with key issues related to global virtual work: choice of common language, choice of communication technologies and media, perceived cultural differences and conditions for trust-building.
The third part of the course focuses on the organizational level, and deals with how production and innovation is increasingly organized in global networks. We will look into specific firms that have developed digital platforms for their internal innovation practices or developed models for open innovation and how they deal with challenges of virtual coordination and communication. We will also look into the construction of global communities of practice and distributed and coordinated learning processes and critically assess the limits to virtual organizing. This section draws on literature on organizational learning and knowledge sharing, and brings in the perspective of globalization into this literature of economic sociology.
Techniques for different levels of oral presentation (elevator pitch, coffee pitch and board of directors pitch) as well as peer-to-peer feedback will be trained in exercises. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description of the teaching methods | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The course will be conducted as a combination of
on-line and on-campus lectures and exercises. The course consists
of 12 lectures and four exercise classes. The introductory and
final lectures will be conducted on-campus, and the remaining
lectures will be conducted as pre-recorded lectures on-line
combined with on-line activities and discussion forums.
The four exercise classes will take place on-campus. Throughout the course, students are expected to participate actively in discussions of theories, models, cases and new forms of organizing in global networks. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Feedback during the teaching period | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
On the basis of the lectures, students will get
an opportunity to engage with - and critically assess - theories of
globalization. The lecturer will provide feedback on the inputs
from the students.
In the exercise classes, students will work with cases and present these cases to the rest of the class. Here too immediate feedback is given by the class and by the instructor. The last exercise class is a feedback session organized as a student conference, where the groups are encouraged to present their preliminary work on their exam synopses to the class. After the exam, the groups will get feedback on their synopses and oral exam. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Student workload | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected literature | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Course literature (indicative)
Archibugi, D. & Michie, J. 1995. The globalisation of technology: a new taxonomy. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 121-140.
Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. 1998. Between trust and control: developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review, 23 (3), 491-512.
Elsbach, K.-D., Cable, D.M. and Sherman, J.W. 2010. How passive ‘face time’ affects perceptions of employees: Evidence of spontaneous trait inference. Human Relations 63 (6): 735-760.
Hinds, P.J., Neeley, T. B., Cramton, C. D. 2014. Language as a lightning rod: Power contests, emotion regulation, and subgroup dynamics in global teams. Journal of International Business Studies 45 (5): 536-561.
Kimble, C., 2011. Building effective virtual teams: How to overcome the problems of trust and identity in virtual teams. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 30 (2): 6-15.
Levina, N., & Vaast, E., 2008. Innovating or Doing as Told? Status Differences and Overlapping Boundaries in Offshore Collaboration. MIS Quarterly, 32 (2): 307-332.
Mahadevan, J., 2011. Engineering culture(s) across sites: implications for cross-cultural management of emic meanings. In Primecz, H., Romani, L. and Sackmann, S. (Eds.) . Cross-Cultural Management in Practice.Culture and Negotiated Meanings. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar: 89-100.
Maznevski, M. 2012. State of the Art: Global Teams. In Gertsen, M.C., Søderberg, A.M., and Zølner, M. (Eds.) 2012. Global Collaboration: Intercultural Experiences and Learning. London: PalgraveMacmillan: 187-206.
Neeley, T. 2015. Global teams that work: A framework for bridging social distance. Harvard Business Review, October 2015, 74-81.
Palus, C.J., Chrobot-Mason, D.L. and Cullen, K.L. 2014. Boundary-Spanning Leadership in an Interdependent World. In Langan-Fox, J. and Cooper, C.L. (Eds.), Boundary Spanning in Organizations: Network, Influence and Conflict. New York: Routledge: 206-229.
Romani, L., Sackmann, S. and Primecz, H. 2011. Culture as negotiated meanings: the value of considering meaning systems and power imbalance for cross-cultural management. In Primecz, H., Romani, L. and Sackmann, S. (Eds.) . Cross-Cultural Management in Practice.Culture and Negotiated Meanings. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar: 1-17.
Stahl, G., Mäkelä, K., Zander, L., and Maznevski, M., 2011. A look at the bright side of multicultural team diversity. Scandinavian Journal of Management 26: 439-447.
Søderberg, A.-M. and Romani, L. 2017. Boundary-Spanners in Global Partnerships: A Case Study of an Indian Vendor´s Collaboration with Western Clients. Group & Organization Management, 42(2): 237-278.
Tøth, T. 2015. Theory on trust, chapter II (p.27-51) in Tøth, T.: Trustworthiness: Enabling Global Collaboration - An Ethnographic Study of Trust, Distance, Control, Culture and Boundary Spanning within Offshore Outsourcing of IT Services. PhD Series 03. 2015, Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen. http://research.cbs.dk/portal/da/publications/trustworthiness-enabling-global-collaboration(4769810b-4055-463d-82ae-73df7fb01b5c)/export.html
Van Marrewijk, A. 2010.Situational construction of Dutch-Indian cultural differences in global IT projects. Scandinavian Journal of Management 26: 368-380.
|