2020/2021 BA-BPOLO2006U Qualitative Methods
English Title | |
Qualitative Methods |
Course information |
|
Language | English |
Course ECTS | 7.5 ECTS |
Type | Mandatory |
Level | Bachelor |
Duration | One Quarter |
Start time of the course | First Quarter |
Timetable | Course schedule will be posted at calendar.cbs.dk |
Study board |
Study Board for BSc/MSc i International Business and Politics,
BSc
|
Course coordinator | |
|
|
Main academic disciplines | |
|
|
Teaching methods | |
|
|
Last updated on 24-06-2020 |
Relevant links |
Learning objectives | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prerequisites for registering for the exam (activities during the teaching period) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of compulsory
activities which must be approved (see s. 13 of the Programme
Regulations): 1
Compulsory home
assignments
The mandatory assignment is a 3 page 48-hour take-home set assignment. The mandatory assignment must be approved if the students is to participate in the final exam. There will be an opportunity for feedback on the mandatory assignment. If the mandatory assignment is not approved or there has been documented illness a second assignment (3 page, 48 hours) will be offered before the ordinary final exam takes place. Please note that to submit the retake mandatory assignments it is a precondition that the student has made a valid attempt in the set activities, unless it can be documented that the lack of submission/participation was caused by illness or similar circumstances. More information on prerequisites for participating in the exam: compulsory activities can be found in the BSc IBP Programme Regulations §13.1-5. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Examination | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Course content, structure and pedagogical approach | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The objective of this course is to provide students with an understanding of how to conduct, analyze and report qualitative research in the social sciences. The primary focus of the course is to introduce qualitative case study designs with a focus on how to produce, analyze and write up qualitative research using different methods, such as text/document analysis, interview and focus group methods as well as observation and ethnographic techniques. The course further discusses how to assess the quality of research and how to approach ethical questions concerning qualitative research. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description of the teaching methods | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The course is based on 4 components:
• Interactive lectures that provide space for plenary discussion • Exercise classes that focus on application of qualitative research methods • Supervised group work that involves applying qualitative methods in a mini-research project • A one-day workshop, in which students present the results of their projects and receive thorough feedback The course requires active participation, this means in particular that we expect students to do the readings before the lectures, attend and actively participate in the lectures and show a high degree of willingness to engage in empirical group work. The course is structured so that lectures and exercises do not overlap with the supervised group project. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Feedback during the teaching period | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The course seeks to secure continuous feedback in
the following ways:
Feedback on application of different qualitative methods: This type of feedback is given during the exercise classes. In each exercise class, the teacher responsible hands out a task which involves the direct in-class application of a particular method that has been taught during the preceding lectures, such as interviewing, content and discourse analysis and observation. The students use the Canvas platform to upload and get instant feedback on their work from exercise class teachers and peers. Feedback on mandatory assignment: Depending on staff and departmental resources, either group or individual feedback is offered to the students following the marking period. Supervision of mini-research projects: Two rounds of group supervision (2-5 students) is offered before the written report for the final exam is due. During both rounds, supervisors provide oral feedback on research topic/question, research design, methods of data collection and analytical strategies in dialogue form. A full-day workshop: Each research team participates in one full-day workshop where they upload and make a short presentation of their research and receive extensive feedback from their lecturers/supervisors and peers. The structure of the workshops simulates a ‘proper research seminar’ with established time slots, where each group acts as a presenter and discussant and the supervisors offer their final comments with room for a plenary discussion at the end. Oral component of the final exam: At the end of the oral exam, the students are given an individual grade as well as the individual reasoning for that grade. This type of feedback includes information on where their research succeeded the most and where there is room for improvement. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Student workload | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected literature | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There is one main text book that will be used during the course:
The textbook is supplemented by other mandatory and further reading material. A comprehensive reading list can be found in the course plan that will be published on CANVAS before classes begin. |