2020/2021 KAN-CCMVV4014U Decision Making for Strategy Execution
English Title | |
Decision Making for Strategy Execution |
Course information |
|
Language | English |
Course ECTS | 7.5 ECTS |
Type | Elective |
Level | Full Degree Master |
Duration | One Semester |
Start time of the course | Autumn |
Timetable | Course schedule will be posted at calendar.cbs.dk |
Max. participants | 200 |
Study board |
Study Board for MSc in Economics and Business
Administration
|
Course coordinator | |
|
|
Teachers: Arisa Shollo, Helle Zinner Henriksen , Ioanna Constantiou, Julie Gerlings | |
Main academic disciplines | |
|
|
Teaching methods | |
|
|
Last updated on 02-07-2020 |
Relevant links |
Learning objectives | ||||||||||||||||||||||
At the end of this course students should be able
to:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Examination | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Course content, structure and pedagogical approach | ||||||||||||||||||||||
In the current competitive business environment, managers need
to be prepared to make decisions quickly and decisively while
implementing strategies. Making strategic decisions involves many
considerations such as weighing risk, understanding the specific
situation encountered, identifying available strategic options as
well as considering long-range implications for the organization.
Most managers report that making decisions is a significant
challenge in their work life. Understanding the nature of this
challenge may be a first step in the direction of improving one’s
capacity for making wiser decisions.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Description of the teaching methods | ||||||||||||||||||||||
The course has 11 weekly sessions where each
session consists of on-line and in class activities
- On-line exercises and activities e.g. case analysis (approximately 1 hour) - Lectures and discussion of theory & cases (2 hour) Student participation will be targeted at producing insights that are meant to be covered in the final exam assignment. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Feedback during the teaching period | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Feed-back during the teaching period: The case discussions are structured around asynchronous group work analyses and subsequent discussion. The students will get collective feedback by the teacher as well as peer feedback on their online activities using peergrade. Students can get individual feedback to questions during office hours. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Student workload | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected literature | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Kahneman, D., & Klein, G. 2009. Conditions for intuitive expertise: a failure to disagree. American Psychologist, 64(6), 515.
March, J. 1994. A primer on decision making: How decisions happen. New York: Free Press.
Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. 2006. Hard facts, dangerous halftruths, and total nonsense: Profiting from evidence-based management. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Rousseau, D. M. 2006. Is there such a thing as evidence based management? Academy of Management Review, 31, 256–269.
Salas, E., M. A. Rosen, and D. DiazGranados. 2009 "Expertise-based intuition and decision making in organizations." Journal of Management. 941-973
Shollo A., Constantiou I., & Kreiner K., The interplay of evidence and Judgment Devices in the IT project prioritization process, Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 24.3 (2015): 171-188.
Shrestha, Y. R., Ben-Menahem, S. M., & von Krogh, G. (2019). Organizational Decision-Making Structures in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. California Management Review.
Zou, J., & Schiebinger, L. (2018). AI can be sexist and racist—it’s time to make it fair. Nature, 559(7714), 324-326.
|