2020/2021 KAN-CSAMO1001U Creating Innovation and Customer Value
English Title | |
Creating Innovation and Customer Value |
Course information |
|
Language | English |
Course ECTS | 7.5 ECTS |
Type | Mandatory |
Level | Full Degree Master |
Duration | One Quarter |
Start time of the course | First Quarter |
Timetable | Course schedule will be posted at calendar.cbs.dk |
Study board |
Study Board for MSc in Economics and Business
Administration
|
Course coordinator | |
|
|
Main academic disciplines | |
|
|
Teaching methods | |
|
|
Last updated on 11-09-2020 |
Relevant links |
Learning objectives | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prerequisites for registering for the exam (activities during the teaching period) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of compulsory
activities which must be approved (see s. 13 of the Programme
Regulations): 1
Compulsory home
assignments
The student must get 1 out of 2 assignments/activities approved in order to attend the ordinary exam. 1. Weekly quiz: Every week a mandatory multiple-choice test is administered. The purpose of the test is to provide students with an overview of which topics they master and which not. More specifically, the multiple-choice test examines students’ capabilities with respect to (i) knowledge, (ii) comprehension, (iii) application, and (iv) problem solving for the topics covered in the course. This helps students to better prepare for the final exam. 2. Mock exam: In the course, a mandatory mock exam is administered. The purpose of the test is to provide students with (i) information about the form and function of the final examination and (ii) an overview of which topics they master and which not. This helps students to better prepare for the final exam. Students will not have extra opportunities to get the required number of compulsory activities approved prior to the ordinary exam. If a student has not received approval of the required number of compulsory activities or has been ill, the student cannot participate in the ordinary exam. If a student prior to the retake is still missing approval for the required number of compulsory activities and meets the pre-conditions set out in the program regulations, an extra assignment is possible. The extra assignment is a 10 page home assignment that will cover the required number of compulsory activities. If approved, the student will be able to attend retake. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Examination | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Course content, structure and pedagogical approach | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description of the teaching methods | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
This course is delivered in a blended learning format. That is, we combine online material and lectures with in-class discussions and workshops. Blended learning (the mix of online and offline platforms) creates a powerful learning environment for students, which we intend to use to its fullest potential. The course consists of online lectures and materials, online activities (e.g. online discussion forum, and/or peer graded assignments), and on-campus group work and in-class discussion. The class is highly interactive both online and offline with a corresponding expectation that students engage in these interactions. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Feedback during the teaching period | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
In-class discussions about exam-related questions, peer review of test exam questions. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Student workload | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected literature | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Exam-Relevant) Reading List (Note: that the list still can change. An updated course reading list will be provided briefly before the start of the course)
Each content-session includes some articles that are exam-relevant and will be discussed in class. Therefore reading the article before each session to be prepared for in-class discussion is mandatory!
Week 37 Hauser, Jon, Gerald Tellis, Abbie Griffin (2006). Research on Innovation: A Review and Agenda for Marketing Science. Marketing Science, Vol. 25, No. 6, November–December 2006, pp. 687–717
Moncrief, William C, Greg W. Marshall (2005). The evolution of the seven steps of selling. Industrial Marketing Management, 34, 13 – 22.
Ernst, H, Hoyer, W. D., and Rübsaamen, C. (2010), Sales, Marketing, and Research-and-Development Cooperation across New Product Development Stages: Implications for Success, Journal of Marketing, 74, 5, 80-92
Week 38 Van Aken, J. E., & Romme, G. (2009). Reinventing the future: adding design science to the repertoire of organization and management studies. Organization Management Journal, 6(1), 5-12.
Brown, T., & Martin, R. (2015). Design for action. Harvard Business Review, 93(9), 57-64.
Liedtka, J. (2015). Perspective: Linking design thinking with innovation outcomes through cognitive bias reduction. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(6), 925-938.
Week 39 Rapp, Adam, Daniel G. Bachrach, Nikolaos Panagopoulos, and Jessica Ogilvie (2014) Salespeople as knowledge brokers: a review and critique of the challenger sales model. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management. 34, 4, 245-259
Füller, J. & Matzler, K. (2007). Virtual product experience and customer participation—A chance for customer-centred, really new products, Technovation, 27, 378-387.
Kumar, V. and W. Reinartz (2016). Creating enduring customer value. Journal of Marketing, 80 (November), 36-68. [pp. 36-40 ONLY]
Vargo, S. & Lusch, R. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing, Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1-17. [pp. 1-6 + pp 10-11 (text related to FP6) ONLY]
Leslie, M., and Ch. A. Holloway (2006). The Sales Learning Curve. Harvard Business Review, (July-August), 115-123.
Pauser, S., Wagner, U., Ebster, C. (2018) An investigation of salespeople’s nonverbal behaviors and their effect on charismatic appearance and favourable consumer responses”. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management. Vol. 38, No. 3, 344–369
Week 40 Sorescu, Alina (2017), "Data-Driven Business Model Innovation," Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(5), 691-696.
Troilo, Gabriele, Luigi M. De Luca, and Paolo Guenzi (2017), "Linking Data-Rich Environments with Service Innovation in Incumbent Firms: A Conceptual Framework and Research Propositions," Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(5), 617-639.
Moe, Wendy W. and David A. Schweidel (2017), "Opportunities for Innovation in Social Media Analytics," Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(5), 697-702.
Brown, Terrence E. (2017), "Sensor-Based Entrepreneurship: A Framework for Developing New Products and Services," Business Horizons, 60(6), 819-830.
Week 41 Andzulis James “Mick”, Nikolaos G. Panagopoulos, and Adam Rapp (2012). A Review of Social Media and Implications for the Sales Process. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management vol. XXXII, no. 3 (summer 2012), pp. 305–316
Kevin J. Trainor (2012). Relating Social Media Technologies to Performance: A Capabilities-Based Perspective. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management. XXXII, no. 3 (summer 2012), pp. 317–331. |