2020/2021 KAN-CSOLO1801U Organizing Change
English Title | |
Organizing Change |
Course information |
|
Language | English |
Course ECTS | 7.5 ECTS |
Type | Mandatory |
Level | Full Degree Master |
Duration | One Quarter |
Start time of the course | Autumn, First Quarter |
Timetable | Course schedule will be posted at calendar.cbs.dk |
Study board |
Study Board for MSc in Economics and Business
Administration
|
Course coordinator | |
|
|
Main academic disciplines | |
|
|
Teaching methods | |
|
|
Last updated on 26-06-2020 |
Relevant links |
Learning objectives | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The OC and SI courses aim to offer a practical
and realistic approach to the complexity and dynamism of
organizational contexts, whilst engaging seriously with theories of
organizational change, strategy and identity. They seek to
facilitate students in developing an understanding of the
multifaceted nature of change, strategy and identity in a way that
enables the making of practical judgements in an informed way and
inspires imagination for responsible action. Upon the courses’
completion, we expect the students to be able to fulfill the
following learning objectives.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Course prerequisites | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Organizing Change must be taken together with the course Strategy and Identity as they have a common exam | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Examination | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Course content, structure and pedagogical approach | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change is a key word in business and management, and enables discussion of, for example, topics such as radical versus incremental change, disruption, and the use of history (continuity) in processes of change. The overall aim of the course is to introduce the students to the dynamics of change in organizations through providing them with knowledge of theories explaining change processes and using those theories to understand the actual challenges of organizing in organizations. Selected theories and examples are specifically chosen to address current developments in business and industry, whilst the course also links theories to methods for studying organizational phenomena. Different people involved in the same set of organizational
practices may have quite different stories about an ostensibly the
‘same’ set of events. Therefore, whilst there are many tools and
techniques that pertain to change situations, choosing what to do
and how to do it, is not straightforward. It makes the issues of
narratives and sense making central in the management of change
efforts. The course views organizing as the process of applying
various means to create commitment among people towards
organizational change narratives. The idea of ‘narrative’ is
closely linked to the notions of strategy and identity, which are
taught in the parallel Strategy and Identity Course. The course
also explains how various types of framing of change processes
influence the outcome of change.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description of the teaching methods | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dialogue-based lectures and case discussions. A workshop will be held in conjunction with the Strategy and Identity (SI) course and another joint session will feature practitioners from different types of organizations. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Feedback during the teaching period | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The OC and SI courses offer several feedback
opportunities during the class discussions as well as in dedicated
activities. Feedback will be given to the group presentations in
the class and during office hours. The student groups will also
receive supervision and feedback on their projects’ progress on two
occasions. In addition, we will
1) Develop a Canvas-based peer feedback functionality through which teams give feedback to each other on their projects. 2) Develop a Canvas-based cumulative note-taking functionality through which the class creates together notes on main learnings connecting the two courses and teachers provide commentary and feedback to it on a weekly basis. 3) Develop a Canvas-based examples’ functionality, in which the class can contribute brief case examples to and comments on topics covered in each session, and teachers briefly comment on that. 4) Create a Canvas-based archive with selected previous year’s projects (permission has already been sought and granted) and have students comment on their strong points and weakness in relation to concepts from each course; teachers give feedback to the students’ comments. This would allow to better align exam expectations and prepare the students for the oral exam, as many of them have not had oral exams before or, at least, not in English. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Student workload | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected literature | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brown, A. D., Colville, I., & Pye, A. (2015). Making Sense of Sensemaking in Organization Studies. Organization Studies, 36(2), 265-277. doi:10.1177/0170840614559259 Buchanan, D. (2017). Managing Change. In A. Wilkinson, S. J. Armstrong, & M. Lounsbury (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198708612.013.18 De Cock, C. (1998). Organisational Change and Discourse: Hegemony, Resistance and Reconstitution. M@n@gement, 1(1), 1-22. http://repository.essex.ac.uk/15783/1/11DeCock.pdf De Cock, C., & Sharp, R. J. (2007). Process theory and research: Exploring the dialectic tension. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 23(3), 233-250. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2006.05.003 Giorgi, S., Lockwood, C., & Glynn, M. A. (2015). The Many Faces of Culture: Making Sense of 30 Years of Research on Culture in Organization Studies. The Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 1-54. doi:10.1080/19416520.2015.1007645 Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University. (chapter 2). http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/downloads/53-PANDORA-TOPOFIL-pdf.pdf Muhr, S. L., De Cock, C., Twardowska, M., & Volkmann, C. (2019). Constructing an entrepreneurial life: liminality and emotional reflexivity in identity work. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 1-16. doi:10.1080/08985626.2019.1596348 Nicolini, D., Mengis, J., & Swan, J. (2012). Understanding the Role of Objects in Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration. Organization Science, 23(3), 612-629. doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0664 Ng, W. & De Cock, C. (2002). ‘Battle in the Boardroom: A Discursive Perspective’, Journal of Management Studies, 39 (1), p.23-49. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00281 Salancik, G. R. (1977). Commitment and the control of organizational behavior and belief. In Staw, B.M., Salancik, G.R., (eds.), New directions in organizational behavior. 1–54. Chicago: St. Clair. Smircich, L. & Morgan G. (1982) Leadership: The management of meaning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 3: 257-273. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002188638201800303 Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory Construction in Qualitative Research: From Grounded Theory to Abductive Analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112457914 Vaara, E., Sonenshein, S., & Boje, D. (2016). Narratives as Sources of Stability and Change in Organizations: Approaches and Directions for Future Research. The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 495-560. doi:10.1080/19416520.2016.1120963 Van de Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (2005). Alternative Approaches for Studying Organizational Change. Organization Studies, 26(9), 1377-1404. doi:10.1177/0170840605056907 Weick, Karl E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing (2nd ed.) New York: Random House. (Ch. 4) Weick, K., & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Organizational Change and Development. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 361-386. http://www.ftms.edu.my/images/Document/MOD001182%20-%20IMPROVING%20ORGANISATIONAL%20PERFORMANCE/change%20Weick%20and%20Quinn.pdf |