2022/2023 KAN-CCMVI2127U Frontiers of Leadership; A Global Perspective
English Title | |
Frontiers of Leadership; A Global Perspective |
Course information |
|
Language | English |
Course ECTS | 7.5 ECTS |
Type | Elective |
Level | Full Degree Master |
Duration | Summer |
Start time of the course | Summer |
Timetable | Course schedule will be posted at calendar.cbs.dk |
Max. participants | 60 |
Study board |
Study Board for MSc in Economics and Business
Administration
|
Course coordinator | |
|
|
For academic questions related to the course, please contact course responsible Sudhanshu Rai (sr.msc@cbs.dk). | |
Main academic disciplines | |
|
|
Teaching methods | |
|
|
Last updated on 16-11-2022 |
Relevant links |
Learning objectives | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Course prerequisites | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Students wanting to take this elective should have a bachelor’s degree, with a good knowledge of global business environments, a good awareness of leadership as an academic discourse and a fair understanding of innovation. A formal education on leadership is not necessary and not required. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Examination | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Course content, structure and pedagogical approach | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The focus of this course is to expose the student to the dynamic nature of leadership in a global context as theorized in the past, its present application and how it might evolve in the future within the backdrop of a fast-digitalizing global economy. Focus during these lectures will be on how leadership understanding within a global context is taking shape over time, how emerging economies are learning from the existing leadership debates and adding to it from their own experiences, culture, and social context. While this course will start from existing leadership discourse, it will not limit itself to the current understanding of leadership. It will explore newer leadership experiences from a diverse experience of leadership from around the world. The focus will be to develop a counter exploration to the existing leadership narrative, in so doing the endeavor is to provide the students a holistic understanding of leadership by filling the gaps and insights from vibrant diverse cultures that identify themselves as emerging economies.
This course in an elementary way will introduce leadership as a holistic human experience, by bringing on board recent experiences of large companies from emerging economies. It will then pose the following question; As we continue to globalize through integrative technologies like the internet, phones, and social media how leadership thinking should evolve. Do cultures merge into each other or distinct new formulations emerge based on how we communicate and work. How will we continue to innovate if we are fast getting harmonized. What new challenges to leadership thought does technology pose, if at all are some of the questions we will explore during the course.
Taking this course, the students will become aware that leadership narratives are rather diverse and getting even wider as different understanding of leadership experiences are integrated into the main streem leadership conversation. In effect; the there is no one type of leader, even though the popular imagination subscribes to such a view in a subtle way. The students will be sensitized to look for leadership qualities in different situations and be empowered to be sensitive to context as king, in leadership discourse. The students will learn to evaluate the role of leadership in innovative projects and made aware of the larger context to how leadership thinking has evolved in a global context.
Finally, we will critically reflect about the future and the implication of innovation theorizing on understanding the future shape of leadership focusing on how leaders create opportunity. This course is to provide the students experience and exposure to how leadership ich theorizing can be integrated and understood within the context of innovation.
The course aims at developing integrational skills, primarily integrating classroom experience with leadership and innovation literature. It is expected that students will then integrate the literature with the experiences from the classroom. This integration is vital for analyzing the contextual bases for the experience and the critical appreciation and limitations theorical backdrop. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description of the teaching methods | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The teaching methodology will take the format of
workshop and seminars and is designed to be interactive,
reflective, and engaging with importance given to feedback. Contact
hours will primarily focus on reflective thinking, critical
appreciation of the literature, and hands on experiential
understanding of how leadership can be integrated to our
understanding of the practice of innovation through learning by
doing.
The class workshop will unfold in three modules of 45 minutes each. The first module will be dedicated to games, with the resource person managing the execution of the game, intervening to provide feedback, and engaging the students in their group work, listening to the students’ ideas., The second module will be dedicated to discussion with reflection about the game, what aspects of the game relate to the literature and to what extent the literature plays a clarifying role in understanding leadership within the context of innovation. the game will be designed in a way to bring out the key theme of the class workshop, which would be to explore the topical literature and combine it with the experience from the games. The third module will be dedicated to lectures which will deliver the key thematic ideas and concepts. This structure will be maintained throughout the course. The purpose of designing the teaching method in three steps is to allow the participants to use both intellect and reflection towards an integrated understanding of leadership within the context of innovation. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Feedback during the teaching period | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The class sessions are designed to be interactive; therefore, students must be committed to working in groups and asking questions at every stage of their learning journey. Giving feedback and receiving feedback is an important part of the course design; students must be prepared to seek and receive feedback from the resource person. Furthermore, additional one-to-one feedback sessions can be prearranged by the student at the end of every class, for a period of maximum 15 min per face-to-face session. This will take place at the resource persons office. The students are encouraged to seek face to face interaction if they experience challenges during their learning journey in class. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Student workload | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Further Information | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ordinary 6 weeks course
Preliminary Assignment, Graduate level: The course coordinator uploads Preliminary Assignment on Canvas at the end of May. It is expected that students participate as it will be included in the final exam, but the assignment is without independent assessment&grading.
Course and exam timetable is/will be available on https://www.cbs.dk/uddannelse/international-summer-university-programme-isup/courses-and-exams
We reserve the right to cancel the course if we do not get enough applications. This will be communicated on https://www.cbs.dk/uddannelse/international-summer-university-programme-isup/courses-and-exams in early March. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected literature | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The literature is suggestive and not final. A comprehensive reference list will be uploaded for the students well in advance of the course on Canvas
Djelic, M-L. and Quack, S. (2007), “Overcoming path dependency: path generation in open systems”, Theory and Society, Vol. 36, pp. 161-86.
Goldstone, J. (19 98a), “Initial conditions, general laws, path-dependence, and explanation in historical sociology”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 104, pp. 829-45
Brown, Tim. (2008). Design Thinking. Boston: Harvard Business Review.
Christensen, C. M. (2006). The ongoing process of building a theory of disruption. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(1), 39–55. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2005.00180.x
Chase, Robin. (2016) We need to expand the definition of disruptive innovation. Disruptive Innovation. Harvard Business Review. January,.
Hui, Gordon. (2014) How the Internet of Things Changes Business Models. Disruptive Innovation. Harvard Business Review. July 29,. |