Learning objectives |
- critically discuss the key challenges of food systems
transformation in connection with resource use in agriculture,
energy, water, waste and recycling systems, and biodiversity;
identify their socio-technological, business and regulatory
components; and examine their development and
interconnectedness
- develop a system-level perspective that takes an integrative
approach towards the sustainability transition of food systems
within the analysis of food production and consumption areas
covered in the course
- apply science, technology and business management approaches
and assessment tools covered in the course in a ‘capstone food
project’ to examine a specific company approach, lifestyle
practices, consumer behavioral change and other societal ‘food
sustainability challenge
- in the capstone food project: present relevant facts and
context of the selected ‘sustainability challenge’; identify the
key problems, stakeholders and interactions; justify your choice of
approaches and relevant data;
- in the capstone food project: use the chosen approaches and
case to analyze the challenge of sustainable food system
transformation; assess existing or provide tentative solutions that
combine scientific, technological, business and regulatory
elements; critically reflect upon the approaches you used; and
provide suggestions for improving these approaches to better fit
the problem at hand.
|
Course prerequisites |
This course is offered in parallel and as
complement to Sustainability Challenges: Connecting Climate
Resilience - Nature and Business Innovation |
Prerequisites for registering for the exam
(activities during the teaching period) |
Number of compulsory
activities which must be approved (see section 13 of the Programme
Regulations): 1
Compulsory home
assignments
Group assignment following capstone group formation
The assignment is to prepare an oral presentation about the group
capstone project selected topic and expected project methodology
The number of students follows the capstone groups 3-4 students
Slide presentation minimum 3 slides per group must be uploaded
before presentation
This activity will be followed by peer and faculty feedback
The student will not have extra attempts to get the required number
of compulsory activities approved prior to the ordinary exam. If
the student has not received approval for the required number of
compulsory activities or has been ill, the student cannot
participate in ordinary exam. Prior to the retake the student will
be given an extra attempt. The extra attempt is a 10 page home
assignment that will cover the required number of compulsory
activities. If approved, the student will be able to attend retake.
Please note that students must have made an effort in the allocated
assignments thoughout the course. Students that do not participate
in the assignments (no show/U) are not entitled to the extra
assignment and will have to wait until the next ordinary exam to
complete the course.
|
Examination |
Sustainability
Challenges Shaping Innovation in Food Production and
Consumption:
|
Exam
ECTS |
7,5 |
Examination form |
Oral exam based on written product
In order to participate in the oral exam, the written product
must be handed in before the oral exam; by the set deadline. The
grade is based on an overall assessment of the written product and
the individual oral performance, see also the rules about
examination forms in the programme regulations. |
Individual or group exam |
Oral group exam based on written group
product |
Number of people in the group |
2-4 |
Size of written product |
Max. 20 pages |
|
Definition of number of pages:
Groups of
2 students 10 pages max.
3 students 15 pages max
4 students 20 pages max
Note that the exam is a group exam. If you are not able to find a
group yourself, you have to address the course coordinator who will
place you in a group. |
Assignment type |
Project |
Duration |
Written product to be submitted on specified date and
time.
15 min. per student, including examiners' discussion of grade,
and informing plus explaining the grade |
Grading scale |
7-point grading scale |
Examiner(s) |
Internal examiner and second internal
examiner |
Exam period |
Winter |
Make-up exam/re-exam |
Same examination form as the ordinary exam
Re-take exam is to be based on the
same report as the ordinary exam:
* if a student is absent from the oral exam due to documented
illness but has handed in the written group product she/he does not
have to submit a new product for the re-take.
* if a whole group fails the oral exam they must hand in a revised
product for the re-take.
* if one student in the group fails the oral exam the course
coordinator chooses whether the student will have the oral exam on
the basis of the same product or if he/she has to hand in a revised
product for the re- take.
|
Description of the exam
procedure
In the Capstone Project, students from the participating
universities will work in mixed groups to examine a specific
food related sustainability challenge in connection with a food
company case, a consumer behavior change or other food system
transformational challenge following a systemic approach
covered in the course that includes reflecting on interactions with
agriculture, energy, water, waste &
recycling; biodiversity and natural resources
systems.
Student groups for the capstone project will be formed in
connection with their affiliation in different participant
universities. Group participants will be drawn randomly from the
list of class attendees. The selection of the food system
cases assigned will take place according to a balance of company
cases and societal transition topic cases.
In the report, they will be asked to present relevant
facts and context of the selected food system transition to
sustainability challenge; identify the key problems, stakeholders
and interactions; justify the choice of approaches and relevant
data; use the chosen approaches to analyze the sustainability food
challenge; assessing existing and/or suggesting when posible
tentative solutions that combine scientific, technological,
business and regulatory elements; critically reflecting upon the
approaches taken and providing suggestions for improving these
approaches to better fit the problem at hand.
.
|
|
Course content, structure and pedagogical
approach |
Rapid and ambitious transformational changes to the global food
system are necessary over the next several decades, including
adopting plant-rich diets, increasing crop yields and reducing food
waste because worldwide food production and consumption will make
it extremely difficult to limit global warming to the targets set
in the Paris climate agreement. Business, government and civil
society are engaging with these complex sustainability challenges
as the world population grows, diets and consumption patterns
change as some countries become more affluent, and crop yields
increase. No single actor or solution can transform food systems
toward sustainability on its own. A momentous global commitment was
reached in 2015 with the adoption of the United Nations 17
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and the Paris Climate
Agreement, with countries choosing to tackle major development
challenges while working toward delivering a future where nature
and people can thrive. These challenges have global and local,
financial, managerial, political, social and environmental
components. Tackling them require strong, trustworthy and
long-lasting partnerships between the private and public sectors,
or multi-stakeholder initiatives involving non-governmental
organizations, community-based organizations, venture capital and
universities.
There is an increasing need, and demand for, managers and
employees who have specialist skills, and who can also operate in
multi-disciplinary teams. They need to have developed a common
language and understanding with specialists in other fields so they
can bridge the gaps between science, technology and business
solutions to sustainability.
'Sustainability Challenges Shaping Innovation in Food
Production and Consumption builds upon knowledge and discussions
advanced in the companion course 'Sustainability
Challenges:Connecting Climate Resilience - Nature and Business
Innovation"
to examine specific challenges of Food production and
consumption within other broad systems: Energy; Water,
Agriculture, Waste & Recycling; and Natural and
Biodiversity resources. Lectures will be combined with group work
and a Capstone Food Project. In the Capstone Food Project groups of
students will examine a specific challenge (within a
company case an individual behavioural change or a societal
transformational case) and assess existing or
provide tentative solutions.
The Sustainability Challenges courses are taught by faculty
members and includes students from CBS, KU, DTU and other
Universities. The aim is to provide a new generation of
specialist professionals with the relevant skills to properly
operate and communicate in multi-disciplinary teams that seek to
tackle and find innovative solutions to the complex sustainability
challenges society and business face.
|
Description of the teaching methods |
In person and online lectures, group work and
simulation exercises
group work on capstone project |
Feedback during the teaching period |
Feedback is offered as follows: 1. in class
usually at the beginning and end of each lecture there will be an
open Q&A session; in addition to feedback offered in
interaction with students during class and following group
exercises during class time 2. as students work in their final
capstone group written report. 3. during office hours for all the
faculty involved in this course |
Student workload |
lectures and group work in class |
30 hours |
in-class project supervision |
6 hours |
class preparation and capstone project work |
170 hours |
|
Further Information |
This course is mandatory for students wishing to obtain
the COSI ‘Joint Certificate in Sustainability:
Science, Technology and Business' (CBS/KU/DTU)
The certificate is assigned by a joint COSI committee from the
three participating universities. To obtain the certificate,
students need to pass the two Sustainability Challenges
courses.
For more info on this initiative, please see:
http://cosiuni.weebly.com
Students not seeking to obtain the joint certificate can
also take each course as self-standing electives
|
Expected literature |
- UNDP HDR. “Human Development Report 2020 | UNDP HDR.” Human
Development Report 2020 | UNDP HDR. Retrieved January 15, 2021
(http://report.hdr.undp.org).
-
Dobermann et al. Solutions for sustainable agriculture and food
systems. Technical report for the post-2015 development agenda
(2013). Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN), New
York.
- FAO. 2020. The State of Food and Agriculture 2020:
Overcoming water challenges in agriculture. Rome, Italy:
FAO.
- Andersen, AH (2012) Organic food and the plural
moralities of food provisioning. Journal of Rural
Studies 27: 440-450
- Auld, G. (2014) Confronting Trade-Offs and Interactive Effects
in the Choice of Policy Focus: Specialized versus Comprehensive
Private Governance. Regulation and
Governance 8.1: 126-48.
- Bjørn, A., Hauschild, M.Z. (2013) Absolute versus Relative
Environmental Sustainability. Journal of Industrial
Ecology 17, 321-332
- Bocken, N.M.P.; Short, S.W.; Rana, P.; Evans, S. (2014) A
literature and practice review to develop sustainable business
model archetypes, Journal of Cleaner Production, 65:
42-56.
- Boons, F. and Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2013) Business models for
sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps towards a
research agenda, Journal of Cleaner Production,
45:9–19.
- Bulkeley , H., Newell, P. (2015) Governing
Climate Change. Routledge. Chapters 1 and 3.
- Bulkeley, H. et al. (2013) Climate justice and global cities:
mapping the emerging discourses. Global Environmental
Change 23.5: 914-925.
- Chum, H. et al. 2014. Energy Systems. Chapter 7.
In Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change.
IPCC. Cambridge University Press.
https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg3/ipcc_wg3_ar5_full.pdf
- Creutzig, F., E. Corbera, S. Bolwig and C. Hunsberger C. (2013)
Integrating Place-Specific Livelihood and Equity Outcomes into
Global Assessments of Bioenergy Deployment. Environmental
Research Letters 8.3: 035047
- Darnhofer et al (2010) Conventionalisation of Organic Farming
Practices: From Structural Criteria Towards an Assessment Based on
Organic Principles. Sustainable Agriculture 2.3:
331-349
- Dovers, S.R., and J.W. Handmer (1992) Uncertainty,
sustainability and change. Global Environmental
Change 2.4: 262-276.
- Dryzek, J.S., and H. Stevenson (2011) Global democracy and
earth system governance. Ecological
economics 70.11: 1865-1874.
- Ellen McArthur Foundation (2012) Towards the Circular Economy.
UK
- European Commission (2015) Web site: Moving towards a circular
economy
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/circular-economy/index_en.htm
- FAO, Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations
(2018). Sustainable Food Systems: Concept and Framework. Rome: FAO.
http://www.fao.org/3/ca2079en/CA2079EN.pdf
- Fleurbaey, M, Kartha, S, Bolwig, et al. (2014) Sustainable
Development and Equity. Chapter 4, Sect. 4.2.2 and Sect. 4.6. In
Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. IPCC. Cambridge
University Press.
- Gregg, J. (2015) Future Diet Scenarios and Their Effect on
Regional and Global Biofuel Potential. Article under review.
- Goldstein, B., & Newell, J. P. (2020). How to track
corporations across space and time. Ecological Economics, 169,
106492.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106492
- Hatanaka, M., Bain, C., Busch, L. (2005) Third-party
certification in the global agrifood system. Food
Policy 30: 354–369.
- Holloway L et al. (2007) Possible Food Economics: a
Methodological Framework for Exploring Food Production–Consumption
Relationships. Sociologia Ruralis 47.1:
1-19.
- Hvass, K.K. (2014), Post-retail responsibility of garments – a
fashion industry perspective, Journal of Fashion Marketing
& Management 18.4: 413-430.
- IPCC AR5 Summary Report for Policy Makers
http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/syr/AR5_SYR_FINAL_SPM.pdf;
- McDonough, William, and Michael Braungart
(2010) Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make
things. MacMillan.
- OECD/IEA. Nordic Energy Technology Perspectives.
2013.
http://www.nordicenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Nordic-Energy-Technology-Perspectives.pdf
- Parajuli et al. (2015) Biorefining in the prevailing energy and
materials crisis: a review of sustainable pathways for biorefinery
value chains and sustainability assessment
methodologies, Renewable and Sustainable Energy
Reviews, 43: 244-263
- Richardson et al. 2011 Denmark’s Roadmap for Fossil fuel
Independence
http://www.thesolutionsjournal.com/node/954
- Rockström, J., Edenhofer, O., Gaertner, J., & DeClerck, F.
(2020). Planet-proofing the global food system. Nature Food, 1(1),
3–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-019-0010-4
- Smith, P. et al. (2014) Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land
Use (AFOLU). Chapter 11 in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation
of Climate Change. IPPC and Cambridge University Press, pp.
811-922.
https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg3/ipcc_wg3_ar5_full.pdf
- STREAM materials (more info forthcoming)
- What a Waste,
https://www.wdronline.worldbank.org/handle/10986/17388 pages
1-33
- World Resources Institute- A Pathway for Carbon Neutral
Agriculture in Denmark
2021. carbon-neutral-agriculture-denmark.pdf
How to Make Agriculture Carbon-neutral: Lessons from Denmark |
World Resources Institute (wri.org)
- Zaman, G., and Z. Goschin (2010) Multidisciplinarity,
interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity: Theoretical approaches
and implications for the strategy of post-crisis sustainable
development. Theoretical and Applied
Economics 12.12: 5-20.
|