2023/2024 KAN-CSAMO2005U Performance Management
English Title | |
Performance Management |
Course information |
|
Language | English |
Course ECTS | 7.5 ECTS |
Type | Mandatory |
Level | Full Degree Master |
Duration | One Quarter |
Start time of the course | Third Quarter |
Timetable | Course schedule will be posted at calendar.cbs.dk |
Study board |
Study Board for cand.merc. and GMA (CM)
|
Course coordinator | |
|
|
Main academic disciplines | |
|
|
Teaching methods | |
|
|
Last updated on 01-06-2023 |
Relevant links |
Learning objectives | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prerequisites for registering for the exam (activities during the teaching period) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of compulsory
activities which must be approved (see section 13 of the Programme
Regulations): 1
Compulsory home
assignments
The student must get 1 out of 2 assignments/activities approved in order to attend the ordinary exam. 1. Multiple choice test: After the first half of the course a mandatory multiple-choice test is administered. The purpose of the test is to provide students with an overview of which key topics and ways of reasoning they master and which not. More specifically, the multiple-choice primarily test examines students’ capabilities with respect to (i) knowledge and (ii) comprehension for the topics covered in the course. This helps students to better prepare for the final exam. 2. Written home assignment: The students are asked in groups to write an essay based on an assignment given by the instructor at the last part of the course. Each group receives a 20 minutes feedback by the course instructor based on the instructor’s assessment of the essay. The assignment helps students to prepare for the final exam. Students will not have extra opportunities to get the required number of compulsory activities approved prior to the ordinary exam. If a student has not received approval of the required number of compulsory activities or has been ill, the student cannot participate in the ordinary exam. If a student prior to the retake is still missing approval for the required number of compulsory activities and meets the pre-conditions set out in the program regulations, an extra assignment is possible. The extra assignment is a 10 page home assignment that will cover the required number of compulsory activities. If approved, the student will be able to attend retake. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Examination | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Course content, structure and pedagogical approach | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aim The aim of the course is to strengthen the student’s competence to analyse and design performance management systems and processes useful for aligning, engaging, and developing the commercial organization’s workforce. By advancing the students’ knowledge of the roles of performance measurement, goal setting, feedback, evaluations, and compensation, new tools to improve coordination and motivation of the commercial organization are provided.
Course content The course outlines a framework for analysing and developing performance management systems and processes in a cross-disciplinary perspective. The course departs from organizational economics (e.g. agency and transaction costs economics) but adds psychological and sociological theory in order to better understand and improve performance information system and process design for informing, incentivizing, conditioning, and documenting key customer and commercial processes in the firm.
Key topics addressed at the course are:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description of the teaching methods | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Theoretical dialog lectures are mixed with case
discussions. The lectures introduce concepts and models decisive
for understanding performance management issues and outline their
theoretical assumptions. Through cases and exercises students train
the application of concepts, theories, and models in order to
design value creating performance management and incentive systems
in organizations.
The teaching methods is through debate, case studies, and a constant dialog between theory and practice. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Feedback during the teaching period | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The students will get the opportunity participate
in two feedback sessions (the multiple choice test and an essay
assignment) to give students a better overview of whether they are
following the expected learning curve. In addition, during dialog
lectures and case discussions students will get continuous feedback
readgarding their understanding of the topics. At the end of the
course a review and Q&A session is planned.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Student workload | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected literature | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
DeNisi, A. S., & Smith, C. E. (2014). Performance Appraisal, Performance Management, and Firm-Level Performance: A Review, a Proposed Model, and New Directions for Future Research. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 127–179
Cappelli, P., Travis, A., & Tavis, A. (2016). The Performance Management Revolution. Harvard Business Review, (October)
Gibbons, R., & Roberts, J. (2013). Economics of incentives in organizations. In R. Gibbons & J. Roberts (Eds.), The Handbook of Organizational Economics (pp. 56–99). Princeton University Press. |