English   Danish

2024/2025  KAN-CCMVV2455U  Governing responsible business: risk management, reporting and finance between sustainability expectations and compliance

English Title
Governing responsible business: risk management, reporting and finance between sustainability expectations and compliance

Course information

Language English
Course ECTS 7.5 ECTS
Type Elective
Level Full Degree Master
Duration One Semester
Start time of the course Spring
Timetable Course schedule will be posted at calendar.cbs.dk
Max. participants 150
Study board
Study Board for cand.merc. and GMA (CM)
Course coordinator
  • Karin Buhmann - Department of Management, Society and Communication (MSC)
Main academic disciplines
  • CSR and sustainability
  • Business Law
  • Globalisation and international business
Teaching methods
  • Face-to-face teaching
Last updated on 19-02-2024

Relevant links

Learning objectives
After following the course, students are expected to:
  • Demonstrate an understanding of the normative concepts, theories, guidelines and compliance demands for responsible business presented in the course;
  • Critically reflect upon the adequacy for responsible business of the normative concepts, theories, guidelines and compliance demands presented in the course;
  • Identify managerial dilemmas concerning responsible business conduct in relation to societal expectations, soft guidelines and hard compliance demands;
  • Identify managerial dilemmas concerning responsible business conduct in relation to societal expectations, soft guidelines and hard compliance demands;
  • Identify and apply relevant normative concepts, theories, guidelines and compliance demands on responsible business conduct to specific cases and develop recommendations for managers
Course prerequisites
None
Examination
Governing responsible business: risk management, reporting and finance between sustainability expectations and compliance:
Exam ECTS 7,5
Examination form Home assignment - written product
Individual or group exam Individual exam
Size of written product Max. 15 pages
Assignment type Essay
Release of assignment Subject chosen by students themselves, see guidelines if any
Duration 2 weeks to prepare
Grading scale 7-point grading scale
Examiner(s) One internal examiner
Exam period Summer
Make-up exam/re-exam
Same examination form as the ordinary exam
Syge-/omprøve er som ved ordinær prøve. En studerende, der ikke har bestået den ordinære prøve, skal indlevere en ny opgave (ikke alene en revision af den tidligere).
Description of the exam procedure

Type of examination, exam aids, and assessment:

A max 15 page essay, which must be based in part on the course literature and reflect the student’s learning during the course.

 

The essay is an opportunity for the student to engage in some depth with a particular issue within the broad area of topics covered by the Business & Human Rights agenda. The essay may discuss a particular human rights challenge (such as working conditions, local community impacts related to the green transition, or human rights impacts in the context of wider SDG contributions); a particular sector focusing of one or more specific human rights issues; or a particular case from the perspective of a business or its business relations, civil society/campaigners, media or national or international policy makers or regulators. The essay offers the student the opportunity to work with a particular issue as an entry point for analysis and reflection on a broader selection of topics covered by the course.

 

Within the above, the student may choose between two exam options: A) a fully self-authored essay; or B) a version in which you critically apply your course knowledge to assess a brief paper (3-4 pages) produced through generative AI based on a prompt by you (total up to 15 pages). When submitting the exam paper, the student must explain which of the options was chosen. 

Course content, structure and pedagogical approach

Target group, background, aim and value of the course

This course is relevant for students with an interest in SMEs as well as students with an interest in larger companies, globally and in Europe. It is also relevant for students with an interest in the governance of responsible business conduct from the perspective of governments, international organizations or civil society.

 

Responding to demands on responsible business is becoming a maze of soft expectations on sustainability and hard demands for compliance. This can be particularly challenging for small-and-medium sized companies (SMEs) who supply to large companies, such as multinational corporations (MNCs). Whereas MNEs are typically subject to softer expectations, MNCs are increasingly covered by hard-law demands on various issues of corporate sustainability. To comply with those demands, multinationals often pass them on to SMEs through contracts or other tools for assessing and steering their supply chains. In addition to production, this affects a range of functional management tasks, such as risk management (e.g., through corporate sustainability due diligence); non-financial reporting/ESG or CSR reporting; financial management and access to finance; stakeholder management; human resource management; contract management, etc. Large companies may hire legal specialists, but SMEs need general or functional managers with an understanding of the demands of their MNCs partners as well as relevant soft standards and guidelines.

 

This course equips students with knowledge to understand those demands and expectations, identify the implications and apply them in specific functional management contexts, such as those mentioned above. In many of these cases, business opportunities and challenges around climate change mitigation and adaptation, textile and garment production, and forestry and agriculture will serve as the framing.

 

The course looks particularly at

- the EU’s ‘sustainability governance tsunami’, which embodies demands on large companies and institutional investors that they are in many cases expected or intended to cascade on to SMEs, also those outside the EU itself, typically in the Global South. The EU requirements therefore also apply to companies in many other countries, making the course is relevant to students from all parts of the world.

 

- softer guidelines and standards with global or regional application, such as responsible business conduct guidance under the OECD and other international, transnational or public-private sector organizations.

 

The course will provide students with knowledge of relevance for functional managers, whether or not they have access to in-house legal expertise. The knowledge will assist students understand the demands, assess the implications, apply them and explain the demands to colleagues and business partners. No prior knowledge of law is required.

 

We consider EU demands, because this region has taken a particular lead in regulating corporate sustainability, leading to an exceptional growth in requirements on managers in regard to corporate sustainability reporting, outward risk management in supply chains through corporate sustainability due diligence, and responsible investment that takes account of climate change impacts, and generally doing business with respect for the environment, working conditions and human rights. The EU requirements not only affect supply chain management and other business interaction with companies from outside the EU, but are also expected to shape new demands adopted in other regions on similar issues.

 

We also examine softer standards and guidelines developed by international organizations like the OECD and the United Nations (UN) and public-private organizations, and look at their application, role and implications across business relationships, regions, sectors and value chains. Over the past 15 years, there has been a surge in such guidelines and standards in regard to responsible business conduct (RBC), especially in regard to textiles and garments, mining and minerals, and energy sources and agricultural products.

 

We also consider how these soft expectations and hard compliance demands are deployed by civil society and governments/authorities in efforts to govern business conduct towards sustainable and responsible business conduct.

 

Students attending this course will graduate with expertise that is becoming in high demand on the implications of legal and softer demands on responsible business conduct, how to internalize those in business operations and management contexts, and how to expand responsible business through various governance methods and tools.

 

Providing unique learning that no other CBS course offer, the course will complement other CBS courses on sustainable business, sustainability governance, responsible business conduct and finance including ESG.

 

Teaching methods

Class time will include lectures, case work, presentations by guest lecturers from corporations and business associations, civil society and Danish authorities and group assignments and presentations.

 

Readings

The course will be based on academic articles and texts; complemented by legal texts and reports from companies, civil society and authorities. Most readings will be available online. Those that are not will be made available on Canvas. The readings will comprise academic and empirical texts on soft guidance and hard legal demands, cases shaping the understanding of those demands, as well as academic articles on wider business governance, business ethics and management.

 

Relationship to the ‘Nordic Nine’

The course is solidly anchored in CBS’ Nordic Nine: it develops students’ disciplinary skills and transformational capacities through advancing their business knowledge placed in the increasingly regulatory context governing sustainable and responsible business, responding to students’ curiosity about what that regulatory landscape means for functional management disciplines and providing them with data (on the hard and soft law demands and their implications for management), recognizing and explaining how the regulatory demands respond to humanity’s sustainability challenges and providing students with knowledge on how to contribute; the course is anchored in values on sustainable and responsible business recognized in vast amount of interdisciplinary literature as well as international politics and governance instruments and business commitments; and it advances students’ understanding of dilemmas around those values and how to overcome them through critical thinking and constructive collaboration. Through the knowledge and value-basis the course advances students’ action-oriented capacities for producing prosperity and protecting that of future generations, growing by teaching to others in a business and wider organizational environment based on insights from the course, and creating value for local communities of various forms based on awareness of the global issues at stake and their regulatory implications for management.

Description of the teaching methods
Class time will include lectures, case work, presentations by guest lecturers from corporations and business associations, civil society and Danish authorities and group assignments and presentations.
Feedback during the teaching period
In in-class plenary discussions, students' sharing of group and case work findings, discussion following guest lecture presentations and other in-class debates, feedback is provided continuously, partly by the instructor and partly by peers with the instructor facilitating peer-to-peer discussion. We encourage students to ask questions or make comments in class to make the most of these feed-back opportunities.
Student workload
teaching (in class attendance) 30 hours
Preparation 136 hours
exam essay 40 hours
In total 206 hours
Expected literature

Indicative curriculum/​list of readings [to be updated when the course is offered, as literature is fast developing in the field]:

- Kourula, A, J Moon, M-L Salles-Djelic, C Wickert (2019) New roles of government in the governance of business conduct: implications for management and organizational research, Organization Studies 40(8) 1101-1123

- Ruggie, J and Nelson, T (2018) Human Rights and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises: Normative innovations and implementation challenges 22:1 Brown Journal World Affairs online

- Sobczak, A. (2006) Are codes of conduct in global supply chains really voluntary? From soft law regulation of labour relations to consumer law. Business Ethics Quarterly 16, No. 2:167-184

- Buhmann, K. (2021) Corporate Sustainability and Climate Change. In Deborah Poff and Alex C Michalos (eds) Encyclopedia of Business and Professional Ethics (Springer), DOI https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​978-3-319-23514-1_1240-1

- Savaresi, A (2016) The Paris Agreement: A new beginning? Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law 34(1) 16-26

- Ahlström, Hanna & Monciardini, David. (2022). The Regulatory Dynamics of Sustainable Finance: Paradoxical Success and Limitations of EU Reforms. Journal of Business Ethics. 177. 10.1007/​s10551-021-04763-x.

- Wiek, A. and O. Weber (2014) Sustainability challenges and the ambivalent role of the financial sector, Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment 4(1) 9-20

- Spijkers, O (2022) The influence of climate litigation on managing climate change risks: The pioneering work of the Netherlands Courts. Utrecht Law Review 18(2) 127-144

- Buhmann, K (2021) Institutional investors and climate justice for a fair transiton. In V Mauerhofer (ed) Governance, Law and Sustainability (Routledge) 222-236 

- Schlosberg, D. and L.B. Collins (2014) From environmental to climate justice: climate change and the discourse of environmental justice, Climate Change, 5(3) 359-374

- Savourey, E and Brabant, S (2021), The French Law on the Duty of Vigilance: Theoretical and Practical Challenges Since its Adoption, Business and Human Rights Journal 6(1) 141-153;

- Enneking, L (2019) Putting the Dutch Child Labour Act into Perspective, Erasmus Law Review (4) 20-36

- Krajewski, M, Tonstad, K, & Wohltmann, F (2021), Mandatory Human Rights Due Diligence in Germany and Norway: Stepping, or Striding, in the Same Direction? Business and Human Rights Journal, 6(3), 550-558

- Bhatt, K and Türkelli, GE (2021) OECD National Contact Points as Sites of Effective Remedy, Business and Human Rights Journal, 

- Senden, Linda (2005) Soft law, self-regulation and co-regulation in European Law: Where do they meet? Electronic Journal of Comparative Law Vol. 9(1) 1-27

- James P, Miles L, Croucher R, & Houssart M (2019) Regulating factory safety in the Bangladeshi garment industry. Regulation & Governance 13: 431–44

- Monciardini, D, Bernaz, N, and Andhov, A (2021) The Organizational Dynamics of Compliance With the UK Modern Slavery Act in the Food and Tobacco Sector, Business & Society, 60(2) 288–340.

Last updated on 19-02-2024