2025/2026 KAN-CEMAV1008U Neuro Research Design
English Title | |
Neuro Research Design |
Course information |
|
Language | English |
Course ECTS | 7.5 ECTS |
Type | Elective |
Level | Full Degree Master |
Duration | One Quarter |
Start time of the course | First Quarter |
Timetable | Course schedule will be posted at calendar.cbs.dk |
Max. participants | 150 |
Study board |
Study Board of Markets & Innovation
|
Course coordinator | |
|
|
This course is part of the minor in Behavioral Neuroscience and Economy | |
Main academic disciplines | |
|
|
Teaching methods | |
|
|
Last updated on 12/02/2025 |
Relevant links |
Learning objectives | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To achieve the grade 12, students should meet the
following learning objectives with no or only minor mistakes or
errors: The learning objectives of this course are that a student
can:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Course prerequisites | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Students should have some background in one or more of the following areas: marketing, communication, advertising, consumer behaviour, marketing research, or the like | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Examination | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Course content, structure and pedagogical approach | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asking people is common in marketing research and it still has advantages. On the other hand, for getting insights into nonconscious, spontanious and impulsive decisions, new research tools need to be taken into consideration. Neuro research design refers to such a new marketing toolbox, which contains of both technical equipment and ways of planning experimental research. The goal for this course is to give an overview of this new toolbox and provide insights into opportunities and drawbacks in neuro research designs. The course makes use of literature review for knowing the trends over the last decades and real life cases to enhance student’s ability to plan, set up, and analyze data from neuromarketing studies. There will be group presentations in class followed be a discussion lead by opposing groups and feedback from the teacher. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research-based teaching | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CBS’ programmes and teaching are research-based. The following
types of research-based knowledge and research-like activities are
included in this course:
Research-based knowledge
Research-like activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description of the teaching methods | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The teaching method for the courses in the Minor is a blend of self-paced on-line learning and dialog-based lectures, discussions, and presentations in class. Common neuroscientific theories and models relevant to all three courses within the Minor are given by e.g. asynchronous and synchronous on-line lectures, on-line discussions, quizzes and individual/group assignments. Specific topics for this course are given in lecture form. Chapters from textbook and articles will be assigned for reading and time in class will be devoted to discussions and questions regarding these readings | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Feedback during the teaching period | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Feedback is given through one or more short student presentations. Short on-line exercises will be part of home work in order to facilitate a discussion in class. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Student workload | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Further Information | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This course is part of the minor in Behavioral Neuroscience and
Economy
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected literature | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Indicative literature - may change:) Alalwan, A. A., Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Algharabat, R. (2017). Social media in marketing: A review and analysis of the existing literature. Telematics and Informatics, 34(7), 1177–1190. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TELE.2017.05.008
Balderston, N. L., Schultz, D. H., & Helmstetter, F. J. (2011). The human amygdala plays a stimulus specific role in the detection of novelty. NeuroImage, 55(4), 1889–1898. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2011.01.034
Barrena, R., & Sánchez, M. (2013). Neophobia, personal consumer values and novel food acceptance. Food Quality and Preference, 27(1), 72–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FOODQUAL.2012.06.007
Berčík, J., Paluchová, J., & Neomániová, K. (2021). Neurogastronomy as a tool for evaluating emotions and visual preferences of selected food served in different ways. Foods, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/FOODS10020354
Bradley, M. M., Miccoli, L., Escrig, M. A., & Lang, P. J. (2008). The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation. Psychophysiology, 45(4), 602–607. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1469-8986.2008.00654.X/FULL
Braithwaite, J., Derrick, D., Watson, G., Jones, R., & Rowe, M. (2015). A Guide for Analysing Electrodermal Activity (EDA) & Skin Conductance Responses (SCRs) for Psychological Experiments. https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/Documents/college-les/psych/saal/guide-electrodermal-activity.pdf
Caruelle, D., Gustafsson, A., Shams, P., & Lervik-Olsen, L. (2019). The use of electrodermal activity (EDA) measurement to understand consumer emotions – A literature review and a call for action. Journal of Business Research, 104, 146–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.06.041
Chamberlain, L., & Broderick, A. J. (2007). The application of physiological observation methods to emotion research. Qualitative Market Research, 10(2), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750710740853
Chua, H. F., Boland, J. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (2005). Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(35), 12629–12633. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.0506162102
Clement, J., Aastrup, J., & Charlotte Forsberg, S. (2015). Decisive visual saliency and consumers’ in-store decisions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 22, 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.09.002
de Wijk, R. A., Kooijman, V., Verhoeven, R. H. G., Holthuysen, N. T. E., & de Graaf, C. (2012). Autonomic nervous system responses on and facial expressions to the sight, smell, and taste of liked and disliked foods. Food Quality and Preference, 26(2), 196–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FOODQUAL.2012.04.015
DeAngelus, M., & Pelz, J. B. (2009). Top-down control of eye movements: Yarbus revisited. Visual Cognition, 17(6–7), 790–811. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280902793843
Dimoka, A. (2012). How to conduct a functional magnetic resonance (fMRI) study in social science research. MIS quarterly, 811-840.
Hayhoe, M., & Ballard, D. (2005). Eye movements in natural behavior. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(4), 188–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TICS.2005.02.009
Huddleston, P. T., Behe, B. K., Driesener, C., & Minahan, S. (2018). Inside-outside: Using eye-tracking to investigate search-choice processes in the retail environment. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 43, 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JRETCONSER.2018.03.006
Kirk, U., Skov, M., Christensen, M. S., & Nygaard, N. (2009). Brain correlates of aesthetic expertise: A parametric fMRI study. Brain and Cognition, 69(2), 306–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2008.08.004
Lee, N., Chamberlain, L., & Brandes, L. (2018). Welcome to the jungle! The neuromarketing literature through the eyes of a newcomer. European Journal of Marketing, 52(1–2), 4–38. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2017-0122/FULL/HTML
Lin, M. H. (Jenny), Cross, S. N. N., Jones, W. J., & Childers, T. L. (2018). Applying EEG in consumer neuroscience. European Journal of Marketing, 52(1–2), 66–91. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-12-2016-0805/FULL/HTML
Meißner, M., & Oll, J. (2019). The Promise of Eye-Tracking Methodology in Organizational Research: A Taxonomy, Review, and Future Avenues. Organizational Research Methods, 22(2), 590–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428117744882
Mishra, A., & Mishra, H. (2010). We are what we consume: The influence of food consumption on impulsive choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(6), 1129–1137. https://doi.org/10.1509/JMKR.47.6.1129
Orquin, J. L., & Mueller Loose, S. (2013). Attention and choice: A review on eye movements in decision making. Acta Psychologica, 144(1), 190–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTPSY.2013.06.003
Plassmann, H., Ramsøy, T. Z., & Milosavljevic, M. (2012). Branding the brain: A critical review and outlook. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(1), 18–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCPS.2011.11.010
Plassmann, H., Venkatraman, V., Huettel, S., & Yoon, C. (2015). Consumer neuroscience: Applications, challenges, and possible solutions. Journal of Marketing Research, 52(4), 427–435. https://doi.org/10.1509/JMR.14.0048
Prescott, J. (2017). Some considerations in the measurement of emotions in sensory and consumer research. Food Quality and Preference, 62, 360–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.04.005
Rawnaque, F. S., Rahman, K. M., Anwar, S. F., Vaidyanathan, R., Chau, T., Sarker, F., & Mamun, K. A. Al. (2020). Technological advancements and opportunities in Neuromarketing: a systematic review. Brain Informatics, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/S40708-020-00109-X
Spence, C., & Levitan, C. A. (2021). Explaining Crossmodal Correspondences Between Colours and Tastes. I-Perception, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20416695211018223
Spinelli, S., & Jaeger, S. R. (2019). What do we know about the sensory drivers of emotions in foods and beverages? Current Opinion in Food Science, 27, 82–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COFS.2019.06.007
Stasi, A., Songa, G., Mauri, M., Ciceri, A., Diotallevi, F., Nardone, G., & Russo, V. (2018). Neuromarketing empirical approaches and food choice: A systematic review. Food Research International, 108, 650–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.11.049
Thibault, R. T., Lifshitz, M., & Raz, A. (2016). Body position alters human resting-state: Insights from multi-postural magnetoencephalography. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 10(3), 772–780. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11682-015-9447-8
Wang, Q. (Janice), & Spence, C. (2018). “A sweet smile”: the modulatory role of emotion in how extrinsic factors influence taste evaluation. Cognition and Emotion, 32(5), 1052–1061. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2017.1386623
Wang, Y. J., & Minor, M. S. (2008). Validity, reliability, and applicability of psychophysiological techniques in marketing research. Psychology and Marketing, 25(2), 197–232. https://doi.org/10.1002/MAR.20206
Yoshimoto, S., Imai, H., Kashino, M., & Takeuchi, T. (2014). Pupil response and the subliminal mere exposure effect. PLoS ONE, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0090670 |