English   Danish

2025/2026  KAN-CGMAI3018U  Quality Management and Customer Experience (CX)

English Title
Quality Management and Customer Experience (CX)

Course information

Language English
Course ECTS 7.5 ECTS
Type Elective
Level Full Degree Master
Duration Summer
Start time of the course Summer
Timetable Course schedule will be posted at calendar.cbs.dk
Min. participants 30
Max. participants 60
Study board
Study Board for Governance, Law, Accounting & Management Analytics
Programme Master of Science (MSc) in Economics and Business Administration - General Management and Analytics (GMA)
Course coordinator
  • Torsten Ringberg - Department of Marketing (Marketing)
For academic questions, please contact tri.marktg@cbs.dk
Main academic disciplines
  • Consumer behaviour
  • Experience economy
  • Service management
Teaching methods
  • Face-to-face teaching
Last updated on 03-11-2025

Relevant links

Learning objectives
To achieve the grade 12, students should meet the following learning objectives with no or only minor mistakes or errors:
  • Understand the concept of experience design and its significance as a new source of value, differentiating it from goods and services, and recognize its role in competitive strategy
  • Identify the major drivers of experiential consumption and understand how these factors influence consumer behaviors and resistance within different contexts
  • Analyze the motivators behind extraordinary and hedonic consumption experiences and understand the emotional, sensorial, imaginal, and cognitive responses involved
  • Apply theories, models, and methodologies to the design process, utilizing various steps to create tailored experiences that engage and satisfy consumers
  • Be able to apply total quality management principles to achieve organizational excellence, focusing on creating a quality culture that promotes customer satisfaction, retention, and loyalty
  • Develop effective communication strategies to foster customer satisfaction and loyalty, understanding the role of feedback and continuous improvement in quality management
Course prerequisites
Completed Bachelor degree or equivalent. Knowledge of service management and operations and consumer insight might be of help.
Examination
Quality Management and Customer Experience (CX):
Exam ECTS 7,5
Examination form Home assignment - written product
Individual or group exam Individual exam
Size of written product Max. 10 pages
Assignment type Project
Release of assignment The Assignment is released in Digital Exam (DE) at exam start
Duration Written product to be submitted on specified date and time.
Grading scale 7-point grading scale
Examiner(s) One internal examiner
Exam period Summer, The exam assignment is written in parallel with the course.
Make-up exam/re-exam
Same examination form as the ordinary exam
1st retake: 72-hour home assignment, max. 10 pages.
If the number of registered candidates for the make-up examination/re-take examination warrants that it may most appropriately be held as an oral examination, the programme office will inform the students that the make-up examination/re-take examination will be held as an oral examination instead.
Course content, structure and pedagogical approach

Quality Management & Customer Experience

The course is structured to provide students with a comprehensive understanding of creating, delivering, and maintaining exceptional customer experiences in today's competitive market. Initially, the course focuses on designing engaging and memorable customer experiences that stand out in the experience economy. Students will explore how to differentiate their offerings by crafting unique experiences that tap into consumer emotions and foster strong connections. They will learn how to influence and enhance customer perceptions and behaviors by studying theming, sensory engagement, co-creation, and participatory design.

 

Building on this foundation, the course then shifts to the principles and tools of quality management, as highlighted in the "Quality Management for Organizational Excellence" framework. This framework emphasizes that quality is not just a goal but a continuous process involving every aspect of an organization. By integrating these principles, the course demonstrates how quality management is essential for sustaining and enhancing customer experiences over time. Students will delve into the Total Quality Management (TQM) approach, which focuses on customer satisfaction, continuous improvement, and employee involvement. They will learn to apply specific tools such as service blueprinting to map and optimize service delivery processes, customer feedback systems to gauge satisfaction and identify areas for improvement, and root cause analysis to resolve underlying issues that could detract from the customer experience.

 

The course also introduces key concepts and strategic management tools, which translate customer needs into specific design requirements. Through these quality management tools, students will understand how to maintain consistency and reliability in service delivery, ensuring that the high standards set during the design phase are met and even exceeded in practice. By the end of the course, students will be equipped to blend creativity with strategic quality management, enabling them to create innovative customer experiences that are consistently delivered with excellence, driving both customer loyalty and organizational success.

Blended learning is introduced mid-course to support practical insight sessions, such as case studies and/or online guest talks. This allows students to learn about real-world scenarios, apply their theoretical knowledge to case studies, and engage with industry professionals.

 

Precourse activity:

Readings:

Pine, II and Dubois (2024, June). How Starbucks devalued its own brand. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2024/06/how-starbucks-devalued-its-own-brand 

Activity:

 Answer the following questions:

  1. How has Starbucks’ shift from a focus on customer experience to efficiency and volume contributed to its self-commoditization? Provide examples from the article that illustrate how these changes have impacted the brand’s identity.
  2. According to the article, how have physical changes in Starbucks locations, such as the removal of comfy chairs and the reduction of in-store amenities, affected the customer experience? Discuss the implications of these changes on customer satisfaction.
  3. How has the redesign of Starbucks' loyalty program contributed to the brand’s devaluation? Evaluate the article’s critique of the program’s shift from focusing on experiential value to a more transactional approach.
  4. What role does employee experience play in the degradation of Starbucks’ brand, as discussed in the article? Analyze how the changes in employee roles and working conditions have influenced the overall customer experience.
  5. What strategies does the article suggest for Starbucks to recover its brand value and return to its experiential roots? Summarize the proposed solutions and evaluate their potential effectiveness based on the article’s insights.

 

 

Please note that this assignment will not be graded, but students will receive feedback. The precourse activity serves as a foundation for the final exam, which will be graded.

 

Course Content

Class 1: Introduction to the Experience Economy

Class 2: Understanding Brand Experiences

Class 3: Setting the Stage: Theming

Class 4: The Role of Senses and Perception in Experiences

Class 5: Design Thinking and Ordinary vs. Extraordinary Experiences

 

Feedback activity: Mini Case Study: Designing a Memorable Experience for a Boutique Hotel 

 

Class 6: Insights from Practice I

Class 7: Insights from Practice II

Class 8: Quality Management for Organizational Excellence and Global Competitiveness

Class 9: The Dark Side: Ethics and Privacy Issues

Class 10: New Technologies and the Customer Experience

 

Research-based teaching
CBS’ programmes and teaching are research-based. The following types of research-based knowledge and research-like activities are included in this course:
Research-based knowledge
  • Classic and basic theory
  • Models
Research-like activities
  • Development of research questions
  • Discussion, critical reflection, modelling
  • Students conduct independent research-like activities under supervision
Description of the teaching methods
The course employs a diverse teaching method to enhance learning. Lecturers will provide foundational knowledge and theoretical context, while group work will facilitate collaborative problem-solving and application of concepts. Individual assignments will assess students' understanding and practical skills, and self-assessments will encourage reflection and self-directed learning. Discussions will allow for exploring ideas and clarifying complex topics, and guest talks will offer real-world insights and current industry perspectives.
Feedback during the teaching period
Feedback during the course will involve short presentations where students share their analyses, followed by discussions to explore insights and receive peer and instructor feedback. Group work will offer opportunities for collective problem-solving, with targeted feedback provided to each group. Individual consultations will also be conducted in class to address specific needs and refine understanding.
Student workload
Precourse activity 20 hours
Classroom attendance 30 hours
Preparation 129 hours
Feedback activity 7 hours
Examination 20 hours
Further Information

This is an intensive 3-week course that cannot be combined with any other courses.

 

Precourse activity: For the precourse activity, students are required to analyze the Harvard Business Review article, "How Starbucks Devalued Its Own Brand," which examines recent strategic decisions that have impacted Starbucks’ brand perception and customer experience. The assignment evaluates how these changes affected customer satisfaction, competitive positioning, and brand communication. Students will analyze the implications of these strategies on long-term business performance and suggest potential recovery strategies.

The precourse activity will be uploaded on Canvas by the instructor by end of May.

Expected literature

Mandatory readings:

 

Carù, A., & Cova, B. (2007). Consuming experience. London: Routledge.

 

Ebster, C., & Garaus, M. (2015). Store design and visual merchandising: Store design and visual merchandising. Business Expert Press.

 

Garaus, M. (2017). Atmospheric harmony in the retail environment: Its influence on store satisfaction and re‐patronage intention. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 16(3), 265-278.

 

Pine II, B. J., & Gilmore James H. (1999). The experience economy: Work is theatre & every business a stage. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

 

Ritson, M. (2024, June). How Starbucks devalued its own brand. Harvard Business Review. https:/​/​hbr.org/​2024/​06/​how-starbucks-devalued-its-own-brand

 

Smit, B., & Melissen, F. (2018). Sustainable customer experience design: Co-creating experiences in events, tourism and hospitality. London, New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

 

Additional relevant readings:

Batat, W., & Addis, M. (2021). Designing food experiences for well-being: a framework advancing design thinking research from a customer experience perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 55(9), 2392-2413.

 

Becker, L., & Jaakkola, E. (2020). Customer experience: fundamental premises and implications for research. Journal of the academy of marketing science48, 630-648.

 

De Keyser, A., Verleye, K., Lemon, K. N., Keiningham, T. L., & Klaus, P. (2020). Moving the customer experience field forward: introducing the touchpoints, context, qualities (TCQ) nomenclature. Journal of Service Research23(4), 433-455.

 

Hinds, R. (2023, April 6). Customer experience is everyone’s responsibility. Harvard Business Review.  https:/​/​hbr.org/​2023/​04/​customer-experience-is-everyones-responsibility

 

Kent, J. (2024, January 8). How to Create Positive Customer Experiences for Your Business - Professional & Executive Development | Harvard DCE. Professional & Executive Development | Harvard DCE.  https:/​/​professional.dce.harvard.edu/​blog/​how-to-create-positive-customer-experiences-for-your-business/​

 

Klink, R. R., Zhang, J. Q., & Athaide, G. A. (2021). Measuring customer experience management and its impact on financial performance. European Journal of Marketing55(3), 840-867.

 

Liu-Thompkins, Y., Okazaki, S., & Li, H. (2022). Artificial empathy in marketing interactions: Bridging the human-AI gap in affective and social customer experience. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science50(6), 1198-1218.

 

New York Times (2018, October 1).  How data will change the future of customer service. The New York Times. https:/​/​www.nytimes.com/​paidpost/​salesforce/​how-data-will-change-the-future-of-customer-service.html

 

Rahman, S. M., Carlson, J., Gudergan, S. P., Wetzels, M., & Grewal, D. (2022). Perceived omnichannel customer experience (OCX): Concept, measurement, and impact. Journal of Retailing98(4), 611-632.

 

Witell, L., Kowalkowski, C., Perks, H., Raddats, C., Schwabe, M., Benedettini, O., & Burton, J. (2020). Characterizing customer experience management in business markets. Journal of Business Research116, 420-430.

Last updated on 03-11-2025