2026/2027 KAN-CEMAV1009U Brand Strategy & Business Processes
| English Title | |
| Brand Strategy & Business Processes |
Course information |
|
| Language | English |
| Course ECTS | 7.5 ECTS |
| Type | Elective |
| Level | Full Degree Master |
| Duration | One Quarter |
| Start time of the course | First Quarter |
| Timetable | Course schedule will be posted at calendar.cbs.dk |
| Max. participants | 150 |
| Study board |
Study Board for Markets & Innovation
|
| Programme | Cand.merc. - Økonomisk Markedsføring (EMF) |
| Course coordinator | |
|
|
| Main academic disciplines | |
|
|
| Teaching methods | |
|
|
| Last updated on 27-01-2026 | |
Relevant links |
| Learning objectives | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This course develops students’ ability to define
and develop the strategic relevance of brands and branding in
relation to key organizational processes in order to drive company
growth and profitability. At the end of the course, students should
be able to:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Examination | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Course content, structure and pedagogical approach | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"Brand Strategy and Business Processes," delves into the strategic dimensions of branding from a business process perspective. Brands, when harnessed effectively, have the power to drive organizational and market transformations by providing a shared purpose and meaning across diverse stakeholders. This course emphasizes the need for brand leadership at the strategic level, wherein brand managers must possess a profound understanding of innovation and change processes, as well as brand leadership skills.
Students will explore the intricate relationship between innovation, change processes, and the role of branding in steering these transformations to enhance business development. Key foundational concepts, such as innovation and change processes, defining the brand platform, corporate brand identity, and managing relationships with strategic stakeholders, will be explored. Real-world case studies will then be analyzed, fostering the development of analytical, critical, and creative skills essential for driving business growth through branding. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Research-based teaching | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
CBS’ programmes and teaching are research-based. The following
types of research-based knowledge and research-like activities are
included in this course:
Research-based knowledge
Research-like activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Description of the teaching methods | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The course uses blended learning to combine
online material and activities, with in-class discussions and group
discussions. Blended learning (the mix of online and offline
platforms) creates a strong leaning environment for students.
The course consists of online materials, case discussions, industry expert presentations and in-class discussions. The class intends to be highly interactive with a corresponding expectation that students engage in these interactions. Leaning is facilitated using cased-based teaching where core concepts and their application are explored through the use of these cases. Cases will be taken from a variety of contexts so that students explore brand strategy in the context of start-ups, SME's and LO's. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Feedback during the teaching period | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The course is built up in such a way that there is continual feedback to the students in the in-class activities. Students are encouraged to work in groups between lectures to disucss readings and key concepts and bring questions they have to the lectures. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Student workload | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Further Information | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Part of Minor in Excellence in Brand Strategy & Analytics |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Expected literature | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Aaker, D. (2007). Innovation: Brand it or lose it. California Management Review, 50(1), 8-24
Aaker, D., & Aaker, J. L. (2016). What are your signature stories? California Management Review, 58(3), 49-65.
Aoki, K., Obeng, E., Borders, A. L., & Lester, D. H. (2019). Can brand experience increase customer contribution: How to create effective sustainable touchpoints with customers?. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 29(1), 51-62.
Ayuso, S., Rodriguez, M. A., & Ricart, J. E. (2006). Responsible competitiveness at the ‘‘micro’’level of the firm: Using stakeholder dialogue as a source for new ideas: A dynamic capability underlying sustainable innovation. Corporate Governance, 6(4), 475-490.
Beverland, M. B., Napoli, J., & Farrelly, F. (2010). Can all brands innovate in the same way? A typology of brand position and innovation effort. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(1), 33-48.
Brodie, R. J., Benson-Rea, M., & Medlin, C. J. (2017). Branding as a dynamic capability: Strategic advantage from integrating meanings with identification. Marketing Theory, 17(2), 183-199.
Christiansen, J. K., Varnes, C. J., Hollensen, B., & Blomberg, B. C. (2009). Co-constructing the brand and the product. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(03), 319-348.
Gyrd-Jones, R. I., & Kornum, N. (2013). Managing the co-created brand: Value and cultural complementarity in online and offline multi‐stakeholder ecosystems. Journal of business research, 66(9), 1484-1493
Hatch, M. J., & Schultz, M. (2009). Of bricks and brands: From corporate to enterprise branding. Organizational Dynamics, 38(2), 117-130
Keller, K. L. (2014). Designing and implementing brand architecture strategies. Journal of Brand Management, 21(9), 702-715.
Koch, C. H., & Gyrd-Jones, R. I. (2019). Corporate brand positioning in complex industrial firms: Introducing a dynamic, process approach to positioning. Industrial Marketing Management, 81, 40-53.
Iglesias, O., Ind, N., & Alfaro, M. (2013). The organic view of the brand: A brand value co-creation model. Journal of Brand Management, 20(8), 670-688
Iglesias, O., & Ind, N. (2020). Towards a theory of conscientious corporate brand co-creation: the next key challenge in brand management. Journal of Brand Management, 1-11.
Muzellec, L., & Lambkin, M. C. (2009). Corporate branding and brand architecture: a conceptual framework. Marketing Theory, 9(1), 39-54.
Ramaswamy, V. (2020). Leading the experience ecosystem revolution: innovating offerings as interactive platforms. Strategy & Leadership.48(3), 3-9.
Smith, K., & Wintrob, M. (2013). Brand storytelling: a framework for activation. Design management review, 24(1), 36-41.
Swaminathan, V., Sorescu, A., Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., O’Guinn, T. C. G., & Schmitt, B. (2020). Branding in a hyperconnected world: Refocusing theories and rethinking boundaries. Journal of Marketing, 84(2), 1-23.
Törmälä, M., & Gyrd-Jones, R. I. (2017). Development of new B2B venture corporate brand identity: A narrative performance approach. Industrial Marketing Management, 65, 76-85.
Urde, M. (2013). The corporate brand identity matrix. Journal of Brand Management, 20(9), 742-761.
Urde, M., Greyser, S. A., & Balmer, J. M. (2007). Corporate brands with a heritage. Journal of Brand Management, 15(1), 4-19.
Vredenburg, J., Kapitan, S., Spry, A., & Kemper, J. A. (2020). Brands taking a stand: Authentic brand activism or woke washing? Journal of public policy & marketing, 39(4), 444-460. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||